Gonzo, please stop editing out gapes - gape related poll

[kidloco2]

Recently I have noticed, that Gonzo studio makes a horrible wrong thing in the editing - they started
to cut off gape showing after just 1 second or so with a direct cut or fade out. What the fcuk is that? Even GG does that now!
I'm very disappointed by that so I make a poll to express your opinions to see whether it's based on
ilusional or real suggestions. Please vote!

[Kriss1986]

Recently I have noticed, that Gonzo studio makes a horrible wrong thing in the editing - they started
to cut off gape showing after just 1 second or so with a direct cut or fade out. What the fcuk is that? Even GG does that now!
I'm very disappointed by that so I make a poll to express your opinions to see whether it's based on
ilusional or real suggestions. Please vote!

Well I noticed that they are cutting scenes too much, and I mean not only gapes but also changing positions etc. I don't like it at all.

[pornlover_holland]

I have also voted. In a good anal scene I lke to see lots of gapes. When a gape is shown there must be a close up of the gape for several seconds, so you can really examine that gaping asshole.

[dap-addict]

Too many gapes disrupt the flow of the sex scene, thus I tend to option 3.
But gapes need to be done and also shown of course.

Generally there is too much cutting in most scenes, sometimes it feels like porn for beginners, just smooth and maximum estetic.
Most consumers of LP watch porn for a long time already and many also know a bit how its all shot. LP customers are a demanding crowd able to stuff the truth.


Btw, I think I mentioned it before, but all LP directors should watch at least 10-20 Jean-Yves LeCastel scenes of his Assman and Weltklasse Arsche period - and learn to beaaaaaam those LP girls fellowing his school.

[kidloco2]

Don't hesitate to vote. I feel this is important topic for anal-themed site since.

This weird repeated sudden cutting or fading out positions in the middle of sex not only look amateurish, it look even unintentional or like an editing error.

LP should stop it ASAP and go back to "normal" editing where you can enjoy each position or shot for more than 1 second.

I vote for option number 3. I want to see prolonged hard and fast penetration (some gaping can occur, but not real gape showing on purpose), followed
by actual gaping session with stretching, repeated dick in/out, finger stretching, gape zooming etc., and then penetration again.

Lets say 1-5 mins of penetration and 10-30s of gape session - repeat at least 2x per position

[Kriss1986]

Too many gapes disrupt the flow of the sex scene, thus I tend to option 3.
But gapes need to be done and also shown of course.

Generally there is too much cutting in most scenes, sometimes it feels like porn for beginners, just smooth and maximum estetic.
Most consumers of LP watch porn for a long time already and many also know a bit how its all shot. LP customers are a demanding crowd able to stuff the truth.


Btw, I think I mentioned it before, but all LP directors should watch at least 10-20 Jean-Yves LeCastel scenes of his Assman and Weltklasse Arsche period - and learn to beaaaaaam those LP girls fellowing his school.

Well said!

[utopiaa]

If option 1 is not feasible, then option 3 is a good compromise. I am a big fan of gapes too, this is why i like LeCastels work and Giorgios Russian era scenes a lot.

[kidloco2]

The results quite surprised me in a good way. LP, do you see it? Let's do it and give those gapes a little bit more time on the screen, please!