PornBox.com

Canadian pornstar.
...no words

Please LP, book her!
...in Prague now

Is she posting this as a hint ...?

...what else

Ok , I see Woodman tweeting with her .

I want her sooooo much

More girls with bushes please .

I think she will work with Woodman, what a shame.

ayrtight wrote:More girls with bushes please .

No girls with bush, please. Anyone who wants bush has dozens of American sites to choose from. The average American porn star these days has so much bush, it looks like she's wearing a second pair of panties!

If she does a scene with Woodman , no harm .
He puts out decent scenes from time to time .

That he sometimes is an unpleasant jerk is another issue .

I had a brief talk with her yesterday. Apparently she heard from many of you already but she wants to go back to Canada ASAP. I didn't insist as she was on her way to Budapest.

Let's see how she resists the usual Woodman brainwashing.

Greetings and best wishes to her .

Maybe she can do another trip to Central Eur. and visit Doghouse , LP , 21s and DDF .

I doubt we will see her in LP, as it was Pierre who flew her over to Europe it seems.

PLEASE carry on trying to get her, I think she could take the guys in a good DP session first and then maybe DA in a follow up.

I have seen a few scenes with her, and honestly, I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. She is a pretty average looking girl, and is a good, but not great, performer.

Unless she improves a lot, I say let Woodman have her. Besides, LP already got the better Canadian import (Jemma Valentine).

I don't know where you're from, TLA, but if this girl counts as average looking to you then I'm moving there... tonight!

A 3on1 scene for LP with this stunning beauty would be priceless! What a pitty if we really missed the chance...

Average AVERAGE??????

bobbi wrote:A 3on1 scene for LP with this stunning beauty would be priceless! What a pitty if we really missed the chance...

impossible.. :-( she is with a french cow

ayrtight wrote:If she does a scene with Woodman , no harm .
He puts out decent scenes from time to time .

That he sometimes is an unpleasant jerk is another issue .

'Sometimes"?!

xxx wrote:I had a brief talk with her yesterday. Apparently she heard from many of you already but she wants to go back to Canada ASAP. I didn't insist as she was on her way to Budapest.

Let's see how she resists the usual Woodman brainwashing.

On AdultTalk DVD Forum, she said that... this is a total lie. She said "YOU acted so rude and without respect"

Is true or PW is always more a psyco?

GapeLoverFOREVER wrote:

xxx wrote:I had a brief talk with her yesterday. Apparently she heard from many of you already but she wants to go back to Canada ASAP. I didn't insist as she was on her way to Budapest.

Let's see how she resists the usual Woodman brainwashing.

On AdultTalk DVD Forum, she said that... this is a total lie. She said "YOU acted so rude and without respect"

Is true or PW is always more a psyco?

Here is our short full and only conversation (on Twitter, she had already added me there, probably to talk about her model page) :



me > hey there. are you still in Prague?

mb > Yes I am
I'm traveling to Budapest tonight

me > ah, I own http://www.legalporno.com too. Some of our members are interested to see you work with us
if you are interested we can deal with your agent that's no problem

mb > Yes so I've heard from many sources! A lot of people have sent me messages about how they would love to see me on legal prono
However at this time I'm kind of excited to get back home to canada, and I'm trying to make this trip as short as possible, I
I find the language barrier is quite difficult for me at this time,
However, I will keep you informed on the next time I travel to prague
Thank you for the offer!

me > We all speak english here. My director here is american
did you just work for Woodman?

mb > I will definitely keep that in mind, I will be working for woodman in budapest
At the moment I'm shooting for Greg in Prague

me > He's always talking shit about us but dont pay attention he is a mythomaniac of the worst kind
but anyway. if you can extend your trip a couple days I can make it worth while

mb > I never judge on others opinions, I'm sure you're a great company, and one day I would love to see for myself.
But thank you I will keep in touch

me > too bad, it would have been a good opportunity to discuss your xvideos channel in person too



You be the judge of how rude and without respect this conversation was. Another brainwashed model.

^ Thank you for the reply, xxx. If she doesn't want to work with LP, it will be her problem. I hope that she will change her mind. She's so fantastic and an excellent GAPER.

I'll wait!!

LP remains my favourite studio

That's xxx version of the story...
there is always 3 sides to a story.. her side, in this case LP side...and the 3rd actually what happened..

nywyz...Marley already said she will b posting her version on Twitter later..let's c

and she is not some European chick looking for work for money...so plz don't put this theory of brainwashing and rubbish excuses...
truth is u were unable to get her on board...live with that
we all know how things are worked out at LP...1st piss ban then JUL models etc...
She is a smart girl and knows what's best for her...

xxxbrobang wrote:That's xxx version of the story...
there is always 3 sides to a story.. her side, in this case LP side...and the 3rd actually what happened..

nywyz...Marley already said she will b posting her version on Twitter later..let's c

No it is not a "version" of a "story". It is the entirety of our communications with her. There is nothing else. And as you can see it is exactly as I reported it before.

Here is an idea: To show the world and more important other girls that LP is a nice company, perhaps LP should release some Behind/Before/AfterTheScene-clips for free. Only to show that the girls have fun and the hard porn in the videos is only acting. Then Woodman can talk whatever he wants ...

xxx plz

Flippantly referring to models as "brainwashed", in public no less, is not doing you any favors here.

[spam]

Tony just posted the way hotter looking Euro version of that Brinxie chicken

*sigh*

Ass2Die4 wrote:^you seemed to be a more rational person before your addition to the Sineplex staff. It seems to me that your comment here is more a cheap shot at XXX than anything else.

No, it's a statement of fact. Have you ever spoken to a woman before? They don't generally appreciate being told that they're brainwashed.

It's not a cheap shot at XXX. I have no beef with him, but if he does something stupid, I'm going to call him out on it, and this was fucking stupid. (By the way, I do the exact same thing with Sineplex, as you can see for yourself in my post history. I openly criticized Fundsex because it launched months before it was ready.)

And for the last fucking time: I do not work for Sineplex.

Ass2Die4 wrote:Like one of the members said previously there many sides to a story and we still don't know the full story yet because like always we have the old, fat, hairy, Frenchman hung like a baby mouse(PW) starting to instigate trouble telling his version, we have XXX version reaction to him and now we have the Marley saying she is going to post the whole conversation on [spam] to show how rude XXX was to her but she has not posted anything yet. So as an observer I don't know who to believe and no need to react yet until Marley version shows up on [spam] sometime in the future.

I haven't commented about anything Woodman did. I think my opinion of him should be well-established by now.

Ass2Die4 wrote:Going back to your comment EP, when a pornstar says she wouldn't work for a company that does everything another company does except a 100% better it makes you wonder why. At least it does me.

Marley also post she started doing anal because they offered her a large amount of money and her goal is to make as much money as she can in the shortest time possible.

The quality of studio, lighting, environments, camera angles and sex is not even a comparison between PW and XXX studios, my vote goes to LP. Also choosing to work in a hotel room with bad lighting equivalent to amateur porn over a professional setup and shot studio I could see why brainwashing would be thrown out there.

That literally has nothing to do with anything I said.

Calling the models brainwashed is a bad idea, period. Nothing good can come of it. Nothing you said here changes that.

Don't make the mistake of assuming that I'm on anyone's side here (Woodman's, or Marley's, or Sineplex's) simply because I criticized xxx for one thing that he did. Like you, I don't know enough about the situation to make a judgment.

I really dont see the problem here:
PW payed her trip, LP offered her to work for them, she didnt want to do probabely because of loyality for the studio which payed her trip.
Better would be she openly said that, but thats Marleys choice.
LP did fine offering her extra work, the more as she was already working for sb outside PW in town.

...and calling her brainwashed is also appropriate, as thats what it looked like with her not baseing her turning the LP offer down on her loyality but juggling.
Also please note that xxx called her brainwashed only after it was clear whe would not work for LP anyway, thus nothing lost e-p.
Wheter calling a girl brainwashed convinces her to take up an offer next is another question, though. But than I do very well understand xxx frustration!

Reading of all these dramas I just long for the Piter 1.0 times when paying a bit over the going rate would just buy any girl and have her perform anyact best she could.

If PW paid her complete trip from USA to Europe to get her in front of his camera then I understand her reaction. Perhaps it was loyality or some contract of PW why she decided to do so.

marley has now posted the whole conversation with xxx herself:
http://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/marley-br ... goddess/10
http://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/marley-br ... goddess/11

so, the version xxx gave about the conversation is the same as from her.

>> it´s clear, that xxx wasn´t rude with her at all.
Or can someone enlighten me as to which of his words and context were rude?
I mean that she comes up with the same version is already telling, that all her accusations against xxx are totally unjustified and hit back at herself

Well, lets concentrate on real gems with our "dramatic little boy problems" (her words ) at least she makes men laugh with funny comments like this
she´s too aggressive for my taste and time will tell how far she will get with her character in that biz. US Porn producers do not like such girls!!!
Wouldn´t be surprised at all if her success will be cut short.

I think she overreacted, xxx was not rude to her at all (at least not intentionally) until she started talking shit about him. He just comes across arrogant.

BUT.

It's also a really bad idea to talk shit about the models in a public forum, and I stand by that opinion. Not my choice, though, and it's too late to fix it now so forget about ever seeing Marley on LP.

evil-pineapples wrote:xxx plz

Flippantly referring to models as "brainwashed", in public no less, is not doing you any favors here.

evil-pineapples wrote:It's also a really bad idea to talk shit about the models in a public forum, and I stand by that opinion. Not my choice, though, and it's too late to fix it now so forget about ever seeing Marley on LP.

Who gives a shit, the girl is clearly a dick. Why is she sitting in the back of a car with woodman taking photographs of texts and communications with the owner of another company. Why is she sitting in a hotel room with him browsing the LP forum and talking bullshit about XXX being very rude to her, when in fact he was very polite and was simply offering her work.... if this isn't brainwashed I don't know what is. Here is a girl who agrees to be filmed lying about the details of a conversation, in a deliberate attempt to make somebody else look bad. I think she got off lightly being called bitchy and rude, I would have some other choice words for her.

Ass2Die4 wrote:^you seemed to be a more rational person before your addition to the Sineplex staff. It seems to me that your comment here is more a cheap shot at XXX than anything else.

Spot on ! Let me go browse the Sineplex forum and see how many times you've put PC_82 on blast for some of the bullshit and drivel he comes out with. You make a self righteous post on ADT talking about people putting their pride to one one side and talking about things like adults, but at the same time come in to a model thread to throw a few digs at xxx about the way he conducts himself, and bash his character for all to see on ADT.

I thought you were done posting here btw, or is the extent of your communication now reserved for unnecessary cheap shots ?

evil-pineapples wrote:I think she overreacted, xxx was not rude to her at all (at least not intentionally) until she started talking shit about him.

BUT.

It's also a really bad idea to talk shit about the models in a public forum, and I stand by that opinion. Not my choice, though.

Agreed. I was expecting more hidden drama from what was being said as showing proof via screenshots. Now that they both pretty much matchup, I think it's just down to that last response which can be taken for being a bit condescending or sarcastic. Again, the joy of communication over text/social media. They'll be interpreted differently, regardless of best intentions.

The post on ADT doesn't help either, especially the second one. It'd be best to leave all accusations, terms using "brainwashed/manipulated", etc. out of the posts. Preferably no posts at all, but if you must just detail what happened from your side. Just leave out the accusations and name calling. Good news though - this is just some overblown miniscule drama. I figured some actual shit went down lol.

To be straight up though, Pierre using that Marley segment on the video he posted is quite misleading. Marley's screen caps were on his forums quite a few days ago of the conversations (most of it) - I'd be annoyed, that is a lame tactic. Now that the screens are out, it's nothing.

tgcfc26 wrote:Who gives a shit, the girl is clearly a dick.

Holy shit, do I really have to spell this out for you?

It hurts his reputation. It doesn't actually matter if he's right or wrong, it just makes him looks petty to talk about this shit on the public forum.

PC does it too.

Let me go browse the Sineplex forum and see how many times you've put PC_82 on blast for some of the bullshit and drivel he comes out with. You make a self righteous post on ADT talking about people putting their pride to one one side and talking about things like adults, but at the same time come in to a model thread to throw a few digs at xxx about the way he conducts himself, and bash his character for all to see on ADT.

PC has no filter and I've discussed how that negatively impacts Sineplex's reputation with him before.

You want a specific example? Okay, fine, here's one. It was a mistake for him to talk about Sofi getting sick. Nobody needed to know that. Forgive me for not commenting every single time he says shit like that.

The difference is that xxx does have a filter, which means he chose to talk about this incident deliberately. I'm commenting on something he chose to put on public display.

evil-pineapples wrote:Holy shit, do I really have to spell this out for you?

It hurts his reputation. It doesn't actually matter if he's right or wrong, it just makes him looks petty to talk about this shit on the public forum.

PC does it too.

But comments like this aren't petty and do wonders for his reputation ?

Then xxx, being xxx, became hilariously rude as soon as he realized someone was insulting him, because it seems that his business philosophy is nobody gets to talk shit about him and get away with it

evil-pineapples wrote:PC has no filter and I've discussed how that negatively impacts Sineplex's reputation with him before.

You want a specific example? Okay, fine, here's one. It was a mistake for him to talk about Sofi getting sick. Nobody needed to know that. Forgive me for not commenting every single time he says shit like that.

The difference is that xxx does have a filter, which means he chose to talk about this incident deliberately. I'm commenting on something he chose to put on public display.

You don't need to provide examples of PC's mistakes, they're clear for all to see. The real difference here is that you spoke to him in private about his comments instead of publicly bashing him on two different forums.