Page 1 of 1

Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:35 pm
by admin

Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 6:35 pm
by xxx
How do you guys like this girl : Lilu Tattoo?

I'm thinking of doing more scenes with her but she doesn't seem to sell so well for now.

http://legalporno.com/model/model/id/2737

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:17 pm
by Pineapples Studio
She's not bad. With the Sineplex treatment, I think more people would buy her scenes. I've said this before, but it's important to look at all factors for why a scene doesn't sell well. In this case, Omar didn't shoot her that well and the action (at least in scene #006) looks kind of shallow. That might be why her posted scenes are underperforming.

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:11 pm
by utopiaa
SHe is pretty cute girl and has a nice gape. The Weird tattoos might be off putting to some

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:14 am
by Symbalar
She has a delicious GAPING ASSHOLE and she can do it very rough, put her with other russians in a GAPE CHALLENGE with Pola ,Sandra Luberc, Lola Taylor or Gina. Did she just work in St.Petersburg?
P.D: More Pola Sunshine please.

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2013 11:44 pm
by twistedvincent
Mt God.....YES more of her!!! I love her look

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:10 am
by gapelover
I don't like her look but she's a great gaper.

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:14 pm
by Sir Noel
XXX wrote:How do you guys like this girl : Lilu Tattoo?

I'm thinking of doing more scenes with her but she doesn't seem to sell so well for now.

http://legalporno.com/model/model/id/2737



Xxx, I doubt I am the only one but i don't do blurry porn - however nice a scene is if it is blurry, noisy or with video artifacts then I ignore it. The scenes you guys churn out almost always have good lighting (the recent Lola Wan scene was an exception, for some reason, it just looked strange, overlit and artificial) are nice and sharp and don't become noisy even during vigorous fast-moving action.
For years Giorgio Grandi has produced blurry porn, purportedly high def but looking like it has been shot with a camera dipped in vaseline. Likewise, Omar Galanti has produced much material wityh shit lighting and lots of video noise, as if the room is too dark and the camera has employed way too much gain - look at the films he has released for evil Angel and compare the quality to the other directors there, does he just not care about his product?

Some people can see past that, I realise (as they can see past the years of scenes 21 Sextury has released that develop horrible video artifacts whenever the action gets too fast, another company seemingly ignorant or not caring about using poor encoding settings), but I suggest to you that many of us haven't downloaded the lilu Tattoo scenes not because we don't like the look of the girl, her talents (wow) or the action but because it means spending tickets on a scene which is liable to amount to great sex shot and encoded spectacularly badly.

I am sure if you guys shoot her you will do her justice :)

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:49 pm
by gapelover
How have you figured out that Giorgio dipped his camera in vaseline before shooting? :D

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 3:20 pm
by dpconnoisseur1
+1, She is a keeper but I kinda agree with Sirnoelplum and believe it may be video quality. Unlike Sineplex stuff when you look at the Giorgo, Omar and early Gonzo stuff video was old looking and colors looked washed out. It is hard for me to explain but there is a definite difference with studio quality videos being released. I think at least one shoot with Sineplex HD cameras will give you a better answer. Lilu has a nice slender body, beautiful gape and can take some anal pounding that I like.

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:48 am
by magizi877
She is cute I think the girl is not the problem with the sales, note that in general I like Omar scenes but I have issues with a lot of his work, such as:

1.- The camera is too close to the action.

Too much of the time is like "in your face" - inexperienced performers and in general most people, will get nervous if the camera is right in front of their face, even if they are actors, are still humans and they are much more worried about not saying or doing something stupid than performing.

The camera man should be mobile so that he can always capture the girls body in angles that make her look good. IMO close ups should be only used for brief moments as a "check her boobs out" or so, and the camera man should only get closer once the girl is invested in the scene, forgetting a little about "I'm being filmed part" (for instance in a threesome when she is being fucked in the ass and sucking a cock at the same time, its nice to have a closeup on her face to get a better reading on her body language) and in general is more pleasant to the eye to see the human body in its entirety. So capture from a distance and then edit the video so the cinematography display the girls body in all her glory.

To ilustrate:

Image

Image

Notice how is not very important to display the male actor completely.

2.- Dialogue is not a good idea.

Omar likes to talk, honestly the only website that comes to mind that does this while not ruining every scene completely is brazzers and I think its mostly because they all speak perfect english. But Omar tends to ask just pointless, dumb questions and make girls feel uncomfortable and showcase their poor english. Suggestion if you want to have conversations put them on a separate video and label it BTS interview or whatever. I like that the Sineplex style where scenes have striptease and such at the beginning I miss the big toys though, Cayenne Klein is excellent at this teasing to get things started. She should share some tips with the other girls because she is so amazing.

3.- The setting and ergonomics

IMO sofas are not very good for shooting porn for threesomes and more participants, often times because they need to leave some view-able space for the camera, leaving some of the actors in awkward positions and immobile. Its much better when everyone is having some fun. Chairs are very good for this, take a look:

Image

notice how the guy beneath the girl is not seated, in that position he can easily trust into girl in synergy with the other dude.

Finally I think Omar always shoots in a motel room. It would be great if he moves to a studio and build a bathroom, a white room with mirrors, etc and while he is at it, invest in better camera and better lighting. Some of his videos appear to be footage from a mobile phone and those kind of require a lot of light otherwise picture looks yellowish and with noise.

Image

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2014 6:03 pm
by Symbalar
The sells looks okey, so do you gonna shoot something(Evilutionplex) whith her?

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2014 6:06 pm
by xxx
She's pregnant :)

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2014 6:08 pm
by Symbalar
xxx wrote:She's pregnant :)

Ouch!

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 7:56 pm
by fashionistasafado

Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:06 am
by Porn Box Bot
Two russian girls for Omar Galanti

Studio: RobyBianchiProduction
Release: 18 Apr 2023
Starring: Lilu Tattoo , Roxana Trip, Omar


Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:22 am
by dap-addict
fashionistasafado wrote:Her another thread: https://www.legalporno.com/forum/viewto ... 80#p152280

Admin, please link both threads finally!

Also, there is a wrong DAP tag in this Private scene by Omar for Lilu aka Lila Tattoo: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/88192


Finally, so sad she's gone for so many years already and when she was active nobody actually shot a DAP with her. :( - Curious what Lilu is up to by now, how her life goes.

Re: Lilu Tattoo

PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:28 am
by dap-addict
Correction: DAP actually happened it seems counter-checking the screenshots. Looked first like Lilu was DAP-ed only in the fotoshot, but not the actual film.
Sorry for the confusion! :confused:

Still finally needed to link both model threads, though!