Perenini wrote:As far as I know she does not do anal and does not make quality gapes.
cinnah wrote:She has pimples and she is very short. She has ugly and wide pussy. I like her eyes only.
avanfurwet wrote:cinnah wrote:She has pimples and she is very short. She has ugly and wide pussy. I like her eyes only.
Hmmmm.
Opinions?
xxx wrote:There is one thing our sales stats tell us : first anal has no extra value. You just slap the word on the video title but no one really cares. It is never an actual first anal (they have a private life), and the sales are not higher. It could be released ages after the model has done a lot more anal scenes too.
I can see the value when your goal is to cockblock others or brainwash new models though, or just to feed your ego, or to get a higher commision if you are an agent.
The sales are higher with more experienced models. They don't have to be much more experienced (they learn and adapt to this stuff super fast), but sales get higher when the models are more comfortable or more known.
avanfurwet wrote:xxx wrote:There is one thing our sales stats tell us : first anal has no extra value. You just slap the word on the video title but no one really cares. It is never an actual first anal (they have a private life), and the sales are not higher. It could be released ages after the model has done a lot more anal scenes too.
I can see the value when your goal is to cockblock others or brainwash new models though, or just to feed your ego, or to get a higher commision if you are an agent.
The sales are higher with more experienced models. They don't have to be much more experienced (they learn and adapt to this stuff super fast), but sales get higher when the models are more comfortable or more known.
Interesting, thanks.
Pretty much as I thought but good to hear it confirmed.
laura. wrote:She has an amazing body and not sure where the criticism of her pussy comes from, its glorious.
Seems to have some depth to her also, agree on her defence of animals, less so on her anti-abortion stance - that aside i'd be happy to see her here.
Anotherfine wrote:Has anyone watched the incredibly pretentious trailer for Lana's first anal what a load of old nonsense .. I'll probably watch the anal part of the scene mind you
Ass2Die4464 wrote:Lana is gorgeous but I hope LP doesn't go Tushy style. It is more artsy less sexual rawness. Then again maybe they have because Tushy is similar in content to the latest FirstGape releases except the Daniella Margot release as it would e consider to raw and intense for Tushy.
avanfurwet wrote:Ass2Die4464 wrote:Lana is gorgeous but I hope LP doesn't go Tushy style. It is more artsy less sexual rawness. Then again maybe they have because Tushy is similar in content to the latest FirstGape releases except the Daniella Margot release as it would e consider to raw and intense for Tushy.
I meant the acting, overall style and quality of production at Tushy & sister sites. IMO Giorgio can do that, and still shoot great hardcore.
Anotherfine wrote:
Hopefully this wasn't in response to being asked if she was ready to get DAP'd
Anotherfine wrote:I see she has signed for LA Direct Models, So no chance of getting her for LP now .. More chance she'll shoot with Woodman which is a pity as she's starting to shoot anal and DP
If you ever get a chance to read her thread on adultdvdtalk I've never seen a porn star but on such a pedestal than her and I'd argue as much are she is very pretty, There are a couple of LP girls who are better looking IMHO
Anotherfine wrote:Tushy thinks its making art tho and is a bit too pretentious / tame for my liking
avanfurwet wrote:Anotherfine wrote:Tushy thinks its making art tho and is a bit too pretentious / tame for my liking
Maybe true, but they have IMO
1. Best locations
2. Best lighting
3. Best camera work
4. Lana & similar beauties
So on balance I think life is good
Only thing better would be if LP could blend Tushy production values with LP's hard edge and the best of the Euro/Russian girls. Kind of an "LP Premium"
Kriss1986 wrote:avanfurwet wrote:Anotherfine wrote:Tushy thinks its making art tho and is a bit too pretentious / tame for my liking
Maybe true, but they have IMO
1. Best locations
2. Best lighting
3. Best camera work
4. Lana & similar beauties
So on balance I think life is good
Only thing better would be if LP could blend Tushy production values with LP's hard edge and the best of the Euro/Russian girls. Kind of an "LP Premium"
Or just apply all of mentioned improvements for all LP scenes.
avanfurwet wrote:Anotherfine wrote:Tushy thinks its making art tho and is a bit too pretentious / tame for my liking
Maybe true, but they have IMO
1. Best locations
2. Best lighting
3. Best camera work
Anotherfine wrote:avanfurwet wrote:Anotherfine wrote:Tushy thinks its making art tho and is a bit too pretentious / tame for my liking
Maybe true, but they have IMO
1. Best locations
2. Best lighting
3. Best camera work
Yes because thats exactly what we are all looking at/thinking when we are knocking or rubbing one out
Iddaoeeok wrote:The first post on this thread succinctly expresses my views on this particular model
avanfurwet wrote:
And if nobody cared about quality we could all just enjoy Woodman's fine cinematography instead of bothering with Giorgio's movies.
Anotherfine wrote: ... Probably more chance of me shooting for LP than there is of getting Lana
Users browsing this forum: ArcanaCaelestia, Google [Bot], lapinoo_91, profondoestremoitalia and 108 guests