guaguancogomez wrote:Rough use of a bad girl's holes Sofa Weber
Studio: Tim Test
Talent:Sofa Weber
guaguancogomez wrote:Rough use of a bad girl's holes Sofa Weber
Studio: Tim Test
Talent:Sofa Weber
dap-addict wrote:If I'd direct that DAP scene she'd have to do and paint her fingernails!
pervlens wrote:She isn't the greatest of performer's but she is very cute and has the 'pay me to use my asshole' vibes. Nice to see a little discomfort too without it crossing the line into questioning whether she really wants to be there.
dap-addict wrote:
Sofa-the-cum-dodger: How about a fee markdown of 50$ for her next non-swallow?
EKS461: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/2156878
xxxVIPERxxx wrote:dap-addict wrote:
Sofa-the-cum-dodger: How about a fee markdown of 50$ for her next non-swallow?
EKS461: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/2156878
I am all for that. Any girl who is a cum dodger, take some $$$ off the fee.
Any non-swallow = more $$$ off the fee.
Any piss dodging, piss spilling for a WET scene = even more %%% off the fee.
It is a good suggestion dap-addict. When I first started working, tough love and adapting to very demanding and hard work situations was the best form of training.
xxxVIPERxxx wrote:dap-addict wrote:
Sofa-the-cum-dodger: How about a fee markdown of 50$ for her next non-swallow?
EKS461: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/2156878
I am all for that. Any girl who is a cum dodger, take some $$$ off the fee.
Any non-swallow = more $$$ off the fee.
Any piss dodging, piss spilling for a WET scene = even more %%% off the fee.
It is a good suggestion dap-addict. When I first started working, tough love and adapting to very demanding and hard work situations was the best form of training.
jjwhite1985 wrote:Mixed feelings about both your points here. Yes it's annoying when a scene is advertized a certain way and then it doesn't exactly happen to your liking in the scene, but if you start docking models' pay after the fact then you can kiss goodbye to any models wanting to work for you or agree to anything other than vanilla acts.
dap-addict wrote:jjwhite1985 wrote:Mixed feelings about both your points here. Yes it's annoying when a scene is advertized a certain way and then it doesn't exactly happen to your liking in the scene, but if you start docking models' pay after the fact then you can kiss goodbye to any models wanting to work for you or agree to anything other than vanilla acts.
Payment is actually pretty high for DAP still in Russia today, although fees crumbled. So a small markdown for not swallowing would still make that job all in all attractive.
jjwhite1985 wrote:Right, but it's not really about how much their fee is, rather the fact that you would lower their fee afterwards. I mean, if everything was outlined and agreed beforehand, sure - for example, this is the fee for the scene, but if you don't do this act then the fee is $50 less, and everyone is in agreement, then fine (although there'd still be complications with this). But if you hire a girl for a scene, and then you as a producer decide that you aren't going to pay her the full amount afterwards because she didn't perform a certain act, you'd never book anyone again.
kolbino wrote:jjwhite1985 wrote:Right, but it's not really about how much their fee is, rather the fact that you would lower their fee afterwards. I mean, if everything was outlined and agreed beforehand, sure - for example, this is the fee for the scene, but if you don't do this act then the fee is $50 less, and everyone is in agreement, then fine (although there'd still be complications with this). But if you hire a girl for a scene, and then you as a producer decide that you aren't going to pay her the full amount afterwards because she didn't perform a certain act, you'd never book anyone again.
If the model didn't do what was agreed she shouldn't be paid the full amount. As simple as that.
guaguancogomez wrote:sofa
Users browsing this forum: arhats, Google [Bot] and 131 guests