Page 1 of 1

Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 2:30 pm
by valentine
1) Braun long and straight hair

2) Clear eyes

3) 100% shaved and a bit tanned and muscled body

4) Not more than 172 cm, like the girls in http://www.lecrazyhorseparis.com/fr

5) 8 cm heels during the whole scene, a necklace and little earrings

6) 5 guys at least and 1 girl only

7) 0%

8) TAP

9) Overflowing asshole

10) No music at the beginning

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 3:33 pm
by valentine
For a good masturbation I add 10 mg of zinc pill every day.

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 3:43 pm
by valentine
Sir Giorgio, do you realize that many customers would pay 10 times more to get this type of doctrine?!

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2015 5:12 pm
by Pineapples Studio
valentine wrote:For a good masturbation I add 10 mg of zinc pill every day.

Whoa, that came right out of nowhere.

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2015 2:22 pm
by leukom
evil-pineapples wrote:
valentine wrote:For a good masturbation I add 10 mg of zinc pill every day.

Whoa, that came right out of nowhere.


Nowhere as in big gaping blackhole or nowhere as in can't express cuz human brain to small? :)

anyway +1 for 10mg zinc pill everyday!

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2015 11:28 pm
by pornjedi
I wouldn't pay 1 free ticket for a scene like you described.

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2015 12:28 am
by kidloco
valentine wrote:For a good masturbation I add 10 mg of zinc pill every day.


what? Ah, the zinc..
Image

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 2:28 pm
by dap-addict
Good doctrine! :)
But why actually those 172cm?
Also for me rather DAP than TAP.

Btw, my own tallness indicators are below 160cm and higher than 174cm (fashion model proportions). I usually tend to go for petite. Gauge is my reference point. ;)

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 12:36 pm
by valentine
As I said 172 cm is the maximum to be in "Crazy Horse". Many decades ago, the boss, Mr. Alain Bernardin undestood it: a too tall girl hasn't a sexy shape, that's why nowadays the top models are too tall because they've been chosen by gay fashion tastes...

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 12:39 pm
by Giorgio Grandi
valentine wrote:As I said 172 cm is the maximum to be in "Crazy Horse". Many decades ago, the boss, Mr. Alain Bernardin undestood it: a too tall girl hasn't a sexy shape, that's why nowadays the top models are too tall because they've been chosen by gay fashion tastes...


Totally agree

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 2:20 pm
by Strictly LP
But that is the height of well, heightism!

Anastasia Christ, Angel Dark, Ani Black Fox, Barra Bras, Cindy Lords, Defrancesca Gallardo, Francesca Jaimes, Gabriela, Julie Silver, Karina Grand, Lucy Lee, Marina Visconti, Olya, Rita Rush, Sandra de Marco, Simony Diamond, Teena Dolly, Virginiee

– not one of these women has a sexy shape? Well I never. If only they had been told earlier they need not have wasted their time on a career in porn.

Like all such arbitrary generalisations, a complete load of old >?@**@!! :mad:

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 2:32 pm
by Giorgio Grandi
Strictly LP wrote:But that is the height of well, heightism!

Anastasia Christ, Angel Dark, Ani Black Fox, Barra Bras, Cindy Lords, Defrancesca Gallardo, Francesca Jaimes, Gabriela, Julie Silver, Karina Grand, Lucy Lee, Marina Visconti, Olya, Rita Rush, Sandra de Marco, Simony Diamond, Teena Dolly, Virginiee

– not one of these women has a sexy shape? Well I never. If only they had been told earlier they need not have wasted their time on a career in porn.

Like all such arbitrary generalisations, a complete load of old >?@**@!! :mad:


Many of them are under 170

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 2:55 pm
by Strictly LP
Well you've seen some of them up close! I took info from sources like IAFD which are hardly gospel, I admit.
However, some above 172, so my question still stands. :)

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 4:06 pm
by Giorgio Grandi
Short girls are more easy to handle for the actors and they fit more easy in the frame.

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 4:47 pm
by valentine
I have 2 ideas:

Re: Here is the doctrine, please Giorgio!

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 5:10 pm
by Strictly LP
Giorgio Grandi wrote:Short girls are more easy to handle for the actors and they fit more easy in the frame.


Those are practical/technical considerations. It doesn't mean that a woman beyond 172 cannot have a sexy shape.

I don't object to personal preferences (e.g. I like shorter well-rounded girls or I like tall willowy girls) just the notion that a woman of 171.5 has a sexy shape and one of 172. 5 does not.

But I do like Valentine's suggestions. ;)