gapefan wrote:You couldn't name one other company
Because there isn't another one that meets those criteria
The link to videobox only stands to prove my point even further. Videobox is
not a producer. All that is, is a combination of scenes from many different companies, that were produced sporadically over a very extended period of time
You don't seem to understand my point. Just for a moment, take a deep breath, and stop focusing so hard on your constant quest to defend the honor of LP against any statement that might conceivably be perceived as an insult. I'm not using "unique" as a synonym for "better" -- but obviously, you are:
No other company is consistently producing the quantity or quality of beautiful models doing DAP that LegalPorno is.
I already agreed with that. That doesn't make them unique. McDonald's sells by far more burgers than any other chain. Does that make them unique? No. Fundamentally, they are still doing the same thing as Burger King, Wendy's, and many others. They are just doing it better, and on a larger scale.
The same is true of LP. That was the point of the VB link. There are many, many other companies shooting the same kinds of scenes as LP, just not with the same frequency. By contrast, I challenged you to name even one -- just one!!! -- company that produces scenes with a combination of pissing and hard anal. You couldn't, because there isn't one. LP did, and that was what made them unique. Did it make them better than they are now? Maybe, maybe not. That's a matter of opinion. But it is a matter of fact that such scenes made them unique.
Getting rid of piss, is 'toning it down'. And 'pushing the envelope', is producing TAP and gapefart scenes
Look at the context. XXX was asked about more than just piss, and he responded as follows:
7. On Legal Porno there is a lot of gangbangs, anal and piss. Some people consider it harder. What is your take on those characteristics of the site? Why the piss drinking?
It's all fine as long as it's all between consenting adults. However, for various reasons, I have decided to tone things down a bit.
The statement about toning it down is not specific to piss (although that is obviously a large part of it). But he is making a general statement that they are deliberately toning things down. Of course, that's exactly what I predicted would happen, back when the piss ban was originally announced. You vehemently disagreed, and, as always, you were dead wrong.