if im been honest

[Kriss1986]

If you are academic or priest - consumers will comment your stands.

If you are a engineer, artist or doctor - consumers will comment your solutions.

If you are handyman or football player - consumers will comment your skills, individual and in team.

If you are porn model or prostitute - consumers will comment your body.

That's how it works.

True, tue, true, I get your point. But it's still a huge difference between statement e.g. "she isn't in my type because I prefer brunettes with big boobs" and "she looks like shit, don't book her again" - it is right? Second - beauty always was and always will be subjective depending on personal preferences and taste. The same model for one people can be "gorgeous and perfect" and in the same time for others only "average". The point is to share opinion and comments in civilized manner and without offending girls. The biggest sign of rudeness is to go to thread of model who don't interest us and complaying about her look. For me it's the same like visit Italien restaurant and complain about lack of Chinese food .

[VBT_2]

Second - beauty always was and always will be subjective depending on personal preferences and taste.

Subjective ALSO, but not ONLY - there is some standards. From consumer's POV personal taste is the most important, but from professional-director's are general standards or standards of trend.

Coments, positive and negative, are there to help if they are properly/smart understanded. Sure, in model-topics post like "you are ugly scumbag" are trolling (this could be the least worry for models, btw) , but in general discussion a little harder vocabulary is OK. "That _____-type models looks bad, boring, unfeminem, too-_____..." is 100% acceptable for general talk. Even assaulting terms sometimes could be message to directors.

[JohnMcSpunkencock]

If you are academic or priest - consumers will comment your stands.

If you are a engineer, artist or doctor - consumers will comment your solutions.

If you are handyman or football player - consumers will comment your skills, individual and in team.

If you are porn model or prostitute - consumers will comment your body.

That's how it works.

No. Doesn't balance. How can anyone try to justify commenting negatively about how a babe looks based on that logic? They all are judged by their actions and ability at what they do, babes too. What they look like is totally by the by.

Commenting negatively about how a babe looks is not justifiable.

[Boshanks]

^ Well said

[VBT_2]

No.

Dominant areas are different: ideas - solutions - skills - look.

If someone's ideas/solutions/skills/looks is/are "negative" and ideas/solutions/skills/looks is/are important for his job - it is legitimate to comment "negatively". (Comment, NOT trolling.)

[avanfurwet]

If you are academic or priest - consumers will comment your stands.

If you are a engineer, artist or doctor - consumers will comment your solutions.

If you are handyman or football player - consumers will comment your skills, individual and in team.

If you are porn model or prostitute - consumers will comment your body.

That's how it works.

No. Doesn't balance. How can anyone try to justify commenting negatively about how a babe looks based on that logic? They all are judged by their actions and ability at what they do, babes too. What they look like is totally by the by.

Commenting negatively about how a babe looks is not justifiable.

Well said, almost agree.

Porn performers, like all visual performers, are selling their looks as an integral part of their performances.

And different customers will each prefer different looks, different girls, and different performances.

Which is fine, if customers can simply respect that others have different tastes and that different girls will appeal to them.

But there is never any excuse for the childish idiots here posting vile personal insults about individual girls.

Unfortunately some of the little kids here get over-excited while looking at pictures of naked ladies and start to run around shouting out rude words.

[Kriss1986]

Second - beauty always was and always will be subjective depending on personal preferences and taste.

Subjective ALSO, but not ONLY - there is some standards. From consumer's POV personal taste is the most important, but from professional-director's are general standards or standards of trend.

Coments, positive and negative, are there to help if they are properly/smart understanded. Sure, in model-topics post like "you are ugly scumbag" are trolling (this could be the least worry for models, btw) , but in general discussion a little harder vocabulary is OK. "That _____-type models looks bad, boring, unfeminem, too-_____..." is 100% acceptable for general talk. Even assaulting terms sometimes could be message to directors.

I understand it, but once more I don't see the reason to focus on girl who isn't in our type and complain about her looking instead enjoy those who we like . Where is the sense? It's simply trolling and only shows mentaly limitations of some folks.

About beauty "standards". As more of us knows in the past the "standard" and the most desirable were women "90-60-90" - synonym of sexuality and perfection. And now how many of catwalk models have measurements "90-60-90"? The answer is NONE. It isn't standard or whatever we call it anymore. So as you can see all those "standards" are still changing.

[VBT_2]

I understand it, but once more I don't see the reason to focus on girl who isn't in our type and complain about her looking instead enjoy those who we like

In model topic - yes. But that is not a issue on forum, more a incident or two from time to time. Even here, in general section, OP uses names of models just to ilustrate his opinion ABOUT THIS LP MOMENT.

About beauty "standards". As more of us knows in the past the "standard" and the most desirable were women "90-60-90" - synonym of sexuality and perfection. And now how many of catwalk models have measurements "90-60-90"? The answer is NONE. It isn't standard or whatever we call it anymore. So as you can see all those "standards" are still changing.

You have some standards since Anicent Greek period which didn't change. Thing YOU'RE talking about is TREND.

Fact that some models don't have 90-60-90 did not mean that measurements are wrong, of course (it means something completely else). However, I would say that majority of models which are generaly considered as attractive are close to some proportions (simplified: 90-60-90).

[gapefan]

^You're right

Gorgeous women aren't lining up to have 3 dicks stuck in their ass

No

Gorgeous women are lining up to have 2 dicks stuck in their ass!

3 dicks happens later

[avanfurwet]

^You're right

Gorgeous women aren't lining up to have 3 dicks stuck in their ass

No

Gorgeous women are lining up to have 2 dicks stuck in their ass! [ img]http://www.eurobabeforum.com/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif[/img]

[ attachment=0]Capture.JPG[/attachment]

3 dicks happens later

Plenty of beautiful new arrivals in 2016/17 IMO.
And for some beauties, e.g. Mina, no need for 3 or even 2.
The girls choose their own levels and the studios can hire who they want to make whatever variety of scenes they want.

[gapefan]

Plenty of beautiful new arrivals in 2016/17 IMO.
And for some beauties, e.g. Mina, no need for 3 or even 2.
The girls choose their own levels and the studios can hire who they want to make whatever variety of scenes they want.

Yes, Mina only needed 2 in her pussy

For now

So young, and still so much time

[cliffwolcott]

Plenty of beautiful new arrivals in 2016/17 IMO.
And for some beauties, e.g. Mina, no need for 3 or even 2.
The girls choose their own levels and the studios can hire who they want to make whatever variety of scenes they want.

Yes, Mina only needed 2 in her pussy

For now

So young, and still so much time

Yes but it seems we won't see Mina anymore

[Kriss1986]

^You're right

Gorgeous women aren't lining up to have 3 dicks stuck in their ass

No

Gorgeous women are lining up to have 2 dicks stuck in their ass!

Capture.JPG

3 dicks happens later

.