PornBox.com

The LP (overdone) formula:

Get hot girl + shitty striptease + throw as many dicks as possible at her + fill as many holes as possible = LP standard scene

Nothing changes!
The girls don’t seduce the camera!
The set is always the same!

Every scene looks the same and I think LP should aim to make their scenes more crisp and slick. The directors seem to be stuck in a loop; everything stays the same and the only thing that changes is the girls and their outfits. You could pick any 2 random dp scenes from the LP database and they will look almost identical. Also, the models are supposed to be porn actresses that perform on camera to seduce the viewer, but they don’t do that, they just act like bits of meat taking dicks in every hole. An actor/actresses job is to perform on camera, not just perform sexual acts, but to actually bring out a fantasy for the viewer.

This is how a scene should be done.... compare this scene to any dp scene from LP and notice the difference!

http://www.xvideos.com/video12957775/ji ... _janson_dp

Great camera shots from the start, great outfit, the girl seduces the camera from the get go and everything looks slick. She genuinely enjoys herself whereas most LP girls look bored.

this scene has soul....LP scenes look soulless and lifeless, just like their models.

Imagine how good a model like karina grand, christen Courtney or lita phoenix would look in a scene like that.

In summary.... I THINK LP SHOULD AIM TO BE THE HARDX OF EUROPE

Wouldn’t you guys rather see 1-2 quality scenes from each model instead of dozens of scenes that look the same as the last?

I agree, they need to change up something. Too much follow script a b c.
Models need to be more spontenous do crazy things!, play around.
and bring back regular pee scenes makes scenes more varying also (more things to do or switch on/off)

Also I'd be interested in models using more dirty words, like getting really expressive, not just one or two words fuck me bla bla. But you know what I mean I hope..

Models laughing always good. especially when there getting a doze of sperm or piss on their faces.

It is very rare in European porn to see that kinda overacting that is the norm in USA porn, so I wouldn't hold my breath.

Totally agree with you. However (there is always an however, right?), you will rarely find hot girls like Lita Phoenix or Arwen Gold in the US, who do hard nasty anal scenes like the LP ones. Even now, as LP abandoned the piss stuff. Thats the reason why LP is still unique. But again, you are right, that most of the LP girls are acting without any passion to seduce the viewer. Plus the very amateurish camera work.

The other thing that is very unique, is the LP payment model. Thats, why I actually pay for many scenes, despite the fact that they get pirated sooner or later. The last time I joined one of these old fashioned monthly $39.95 subscriptions on an US porn site, was many many years ago. Thats why I think the the days of US quality porn are numbered, if they don't switch to a modern payment and distribution model. I say that, because I think, good porn has to be paid, in order to exist and to improve.

Lol yes, there is always an however and I do agree with you except that there are plenty of hot American girls doing nasty anal.

Jillian janson
Marlex brinx
Keisha grey
Kelsie Monroe
Megan Rain
Adriana Chechik
Dakota Skye (before she retired)
Kate England
Anikka Albrite
Carter cruise
And many many more

I don’t know whether the US quality porn days are numbered or not because you can never accurately say what the industry will do in the future. Well, I don’t know what it will do, but I’m guessing a porn insider would be a better judge. I do agree that the LP payment model is a great way to fight piracy and because of that model, LP should be making more than enough cash to allow them to make high quality scenes.

If i was LP, i would set up another studio that can make the high quality scenes and let the rest of the studios do what they are doing. That way they can keep pumping out the regular work and also produce high quality scenes along side it.

Here’s an idea, why not just experiment!!!! Try making the one high quality scene as a sample and let the LP member’s judge on how good it is. I’m betting that it would be the best scene that LP ever made. As for the model, bring in Christen Courtney.... She’s pretty good at camera seduction, she enjoys the fucking, is filthy and hot as hell! I believe her English is pretty good too so i think she would be the perfect candidate. Make it a regular dp scene, with 2 guys to start off with, dress her up to look amazing and then finish it off with blowbang.

I don't really thing that LP needs to do much to level up their scenes.

bigj wrote:The girls don’t seduce the camera!

Also, the models are supposed to be porn actresses that perform on camera to seduce the viewer...

...bring out a fantasy for the viewer.

I agree with the specific statement above that more eroticism is needed. Some of these models are extremely beautiful but LP just jumps right into the sex. I like you would rather more seduction, full body stripping(or teasing) and simulated eye contact with the viewer. That said I love the white room and I hope it never changes. The lighting is always great in the white room and I'm not an interior decorator so don't care if the room changes. Even American companies use the same locations: Jules Jordan (JJV) and Mason (HardX) for instance shoot all their stuff in their house. Would it be cool to see and outdoor scene maybe or a different indoor location of course but I prefer the lighting to be perfect and I never have to worry about that with LP. You may want to give Giorgio a shot in his new series "Big Mess" and see what you think.

Giorgio Grandi wrote:In the "big Mess" I keep my direction as low as possible, I let the performers have fun. This is why the original formula seams missed, but there is enough of anything for enjoy a good scene. Its smt different then usual, more natural. Lets see how it sells. I wanted to try to let the performer free. Im happy with the result, and Ariadna had more fun then usual having the freedom to be 100% herself (also the same for the boys)

I hoping for big things from this series!!!

If your point is that LP should be more like HardX (or pretty much any American porn, for that matter), then I completely disagree.

LP's content isn't nearly as good right now as it was say, 6 months ago, but it's still far better than 95% of American porn.

I agree with the "shitty striptease" complaint.

Most of the girls just suck at this. LP needs to hire an instructor for this act.
Considering this is included in 99% of the scenes. It should be a concern for improvement.

This is especially important for the girls with extraordinary good looking body.

Every director has it's own style.
LP directors are top notch, but they need some fresh idea's..
It's normal.

Please bring back the Piss !!

bigj ... they won't listen ... (even a fool knows when it's gold...)

"it's not going to change"... evil-pineapples was very clear...

LP directors are top notch, but they need some fresh idea's..

bigj wrote:this scene has soul....LP scenes look soulless and lifeless, just like their models.

Look its their style and if you dont like it than better ask the best US companies to book more Eurobabes.

For me, thanks for your imput, but...
Girls seducing camera: some improvement here wouldnt harm, yes, but than I usually jus watch 2-3 min of the intro and jump to the fucking.
Same studio always: n/a, no problem as long as the lighting is good
Throw as many dicks as possible at her: n/a, most scenes are 3on1
Fill as many holes as possible: n/a, thats exactly what I am here for

To sum it up: No US overacting bs please, but LP should try to get a harder edge in their scenes again, more raw sex energy and better cum-shots!
Dont change the recipy, but get some new regular studs able to entice and manhandle the girls more again and convey that primal lust for really dirty hard sex!

dap-addict wrote:
To sum it up: No US overacting bs please, but LP should try to get a harder edge in their scenes again, more raw sex energy and better cum-shots!
Dont change the recipy, but get some new regular studs able to entice and manhandle the girls more again and convey that primal lust for really dirty hard sex!

Yep, you nailed it, dap-addict! The scenes should be as natural as possible, simply raw, without script bullshit or the common 'look-in-the-camera-and-smile' mambo-jambo. I like the girls, who are lustfully lookin' into the eyes of the studs, when they shoot their load over her...

Baiken wrote:bigj ... they won't listen ... (even a fool knows when it's gold...)

"it's not going to change"... evil-pineapples was very clear...

I didn't say anything controversial.

All you need to do is watch Sineplex's movies dating back ten years up to the present day. Look at what's changed and what hasn't. The studio has a very specific style, which has proven successful for over a decade, and I don't foresee any major changes to that style.

Might there be little things added along the way? Sure. Kreme was never really a thing until later in the studio's life. Neither was pissing. However, one thing that has remained consistent throughout the years is the general formula and tone of the scenes.

I also skip most intros now. Some intros can take up to 1/3 of the movie running time. And it wouldn't be a problem if they were exciting to watch but no they aren't.
I usually watch the part where the girl is just being sexy, teasing and per say, dancing: while the camera man is capturing her beauty in a way that I prefer seeing, that being full body view. (which he later forgets and focuses on her torso )

If the toy part is not going away please consider this feedback to make it better:

Get rid of the solid plastic toys for solo girls, those that can't bend and have zero flexibility. It's too hard for the girl to manipulate those to stimulate herself. Reason being, those hard plastic dildos are meant to enter at a 90 degree angle, and that's hard to achieve in a repeated fashion in a solo situation. With that said, what makes the dildo part boring, to me, is that the girl is not using the dildo to simulate a men fucking her, as a man would fuck her, that being with a nice rhythm and energy.

Only provide with those toys that kind of look like a snake with the shape of cock, those that are flexible and pretty large. This characteristics makes them easy to manipulate solo, the girl doesn't need to crunch that much to reach her holes and the toy can enter at an angle that is easy for the girl to do. So hopefully that would make it easy enough for the girl to play with the dildo in a way that looks like a man is doing it.

Note: By a large toy I mean, big in length so it's easy to grab and penetrate at the same time, I think the thickness of the toy should be up to the girl, where thicker is nicer to watch. So she should pick something that is between her comfortableness and viewers pleasure.

How about, correct the bad blood in the industry, maintain healthy relationships with other agencies to ensure model talent, and - dare to be taboo and boundary pushing instead of hastily conservative, and or attempting to assimilate.

Stuff what I am missing on LP:
- MILF (Few of them are there, but not so much, Veronica Avluv would be fine)
- Facefucking
- Rough stuff (something like hardcoregangbang)
- Ebony girls
- Asian girls
- Big tits (bimbo girls)
- Blowbang, bukkake

A big problem for me is also the room, always the same, thats why every scene seems to be the same and this room looks shit, so the movie often looks shit.