homoneandertalensis1990 wrote:As far as I understand, the fees that the studio offered for filming are quite good and similar to the fees of other studios. In addition, this model, frankly speaking, is not a superstar. Judging by the correspondence, she agreed to this exact payment. They paid her the money, so who and what is the claim now?
It seems to me that they just had some disagreements during filming, and now she is trying to get “revenge”, that’s all.
jjwhite1985 wrote:homoneandertalensis1990 wrote:As far as I understand, the fees that the studio offered for filming are quite good and similar to the fees of other studios. In addition, this model, frankly speaking, is not a superstar. Judging by the correspondence, she agreed to this exact payment. They paid her the money, so who and what is the claim now?
It seems to me that they just had some disagreements during filming, and now she is trying to get “revenge”, that’s all.
Well if you look at the screenshots the agreed fees totalled €5200 for four scenes, whereas they only paid her €4935, which is why she's complaining that they've stiffed her for €265. Whether or not she's a well known model is irrelevant (perhaps worse if they thought they could get away with it because she doesn't have name recognition).
homoneandertalensis1990 wrote:jjwhite1985 wrote:homoneandertalensis1990 wrote:As far as I understand, the fees that the studio offered for filming are quite good and similar to the fees of other studios. In addition, this model, frankly speaking, is not a superstar. Judging by the correspondence, she agreed to this exact payment. They paid her the money, so who and what is the claim now?
It seems to me that they just had some disagreements during filming, and now she is trying to get “revenge”, that’s all.
Well if you look at the screenshots the agreed fees totalled €5200 for four scenes, whereas they only paid her €4935, which is why she's complaining that they've stiffed her for €265. Whether or not she's a well known model is irrelevant (perhaps worse if they thought they could get away with it because she doesn't have name recognition).
Yes, I see it now. But at first, fees were offered in dollars, not euros. Maybe they were talking about dollars? In any case, we don't know all the details.
homoneandertalensis1990 wrote:jjwhite1985 wrote:homoneandertalensis1990 wrote:As far as I understand, the fees that the studio offered for filming are quite good and similar to the fees of other studios. In addition, this model, frankly speaking, is not a superstar. Judging by the correspondence, she agreed to this exact payment. They paid her the money, so who and what is the claim now?
It seems to me that they just had some disagreements during filming, and now she is trying to get “revenge”, that’s all.
Well if you look at the screenshots the agreed fees totalled €5200 for four scenes, whereas they only paid her €4935, which is why she's complaining that they've stiffed her for €265. Whether or not she's a well known model is irrelevant (perhaps worse if they thought they could get away with it because she doesn't have name recognition).
Yes, I see it now. But at first, fees were offered in dollars, not euros. Maybe they were talking about dollars? In any case, we don't know all the details.
jjwhite1985 wrote:European studios and European models aren't going to deal in dollars so this was obviously a typo originally. The fees were agreed in Euros, as you can see in the screenshot.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:jjwhite1985 wrote:European studios and European models aren't going to deal in dollars so this was obviously a typo originally. The fees were agreed in Euros, as you can see in the screenshot.
Many studios are dealing in USD dollars also in Europe
jjwhite1985 wrote:Giorgio Grandi wrote:jjwhite1985 wrote:European studios and European models aren't going to deal in dollars so this was obviously a typo originally. The fees were agreed in Euros, as you can see in the screenshot.
Many studios are dealing in USD dollars also in Europe
And is EKS dealing in USD?
homoneandertalensis1990 wrote:Yes, I see it now. But at first, fees were offered in dollars, not euros. Maybe they were talking about dollars? In any case, we don't know all the details.
jjwhite1985 wrote:You've all got eyes right, you can see it was agreed in euros? Man it's no wonder mainstream porn is on its ass, what girl in their right mind is gonna keep going through this much trouble just to get paid when other alternatives are available
maxymax wrote:This is just absurd and wrong way of resolving a specific conflict. For all we know this could be an isolated incident, provided it is true and this is not the way one should take it up by trying to instigate a boycott of a studio that is bread & butter for many performers and other professionals involved. In fact, we as members/consumers have no right to even discuss this and judge. It should be the two involved parties that should sort it out among themselves. The OP has posted only one side of the story and who knows what went on behind the scenes
Giorgio, surprised to see you post here despite your decades of experience in the business and as a professional I'd stay out of such posts
dap-addict wrote:Indeed, could be that it's only a USD to Euro conversion question.
maxymax wrote:This is just absurd and wrong way of resolving a specific conflict. For all we know this could be an isolated incident, provided it is true and this is not the way one should take it up by trying to instigate a boycott of a studio that is bread & butter for many performers and other professionals involved. In fact, we as members/consumers have no right to even discuss this and judge. It should be the two involved parties that should sort it out among themselves. The OP has posted only one side of the story and who knows what went on behind the scenes
peshmerga wrote:maxymax wrote:This is just absurd and wrong way of resolving a specific conflict. For all we know this could be an isolated incident, provided it is true and this is not the way one should take it up by trying to instigate a boycott of a studio that is bread & butter for many performers and other professionals involved. In fact, we as members/consumers have no right to even discuss this and judge. It should be the two involved parties that should sort it out among themselves. The OP has posted only one side of the story and who knows what went on behind the scenes
Shame on you, so by your reasoning if a producer steals(or beats up) a model it's not the members/consumers problem.. and we should keep buying scenes from that studio? are you ok or what? I've never watched a scene of Melania, I don't like her but I've morals and sensitivity about petty behaviour
peshmerga wrote:maxymax wrote:This is just absurd and wrong way of resolving a specific conflict. For all we know this could be an isolated incident, provided it is true and this is not the way one should take it up by trying to instigate a boycott of a studio that is bread & butter for many performers and other professionals involved. In fact, we as members/consumers have no right to even discuss this and judge. It should be the two involved parties that should sort it out among themselves. The OP has posted only one side of the story and who knows what went on behind the scenes
Shame on you, so by your reasoning if a producer steals(or beats up) a model it's not the members/consumers problem.. and we should keep buying scenes from that studio? are you ok or what? I've never watched a scene of Melania, I don't like her but I've morals and sensitivity about petty behaviour
Users browsing this forum: marcoB and 31 guests