PornBox.com

Hello,

i don't know how others see this point, but i don't buy any videos where girls keep wearing any clothes, shoes etc. That turns me off. I see clothes enough every day in the "normal life" - i dont't want to see them while people are fucking.

For me (and all my friends also is fact): I would buy a lot more from you if so much girls would not where clothes.

I like a bit of variety but i find sexy clothes sexy.

IMO the poll is missing stuff. I don't like fully clothed, but I don't mind when they still wear some panties and such while having sex.

Fully naked is good but I don't mind either way to be honest. Although there have been a few times where the girl has a gorgeous pair of tits and she never took her top off which was a bit disappointing. Then there's times where the girl's dressed in a uniform (schoolgirl, nurse, etc) and those times I'd rather she keeps some of the clothes on, just unbutton the shirt and hitch up the skirt and you're good to go. And if the girl starts the scene in knee/thigh high socks those should never come off.

magizi87 wrote:IMO the poll is missing stuff. I don't like fully clothed, but I don't mind when they still wear some panties and such while having sex.

I think the poll is find because the poll creator is trying to get a count of forum dwellers that share the same nude opinion with him! So we have to now decide how important it is to us for the model to be fully nude or partially/fully clothed. I chose fully nude my exception is when the scene has multiple girls and I can't figure out who is doing what the clothing is a quick visual cue!

I definitely prefer the girl to keep at least some clothing on for as long as possible, particularly in the following situations:

1. If her outfit is particularly sexy, like a short skirt that is just pulled up to her waist, with her thong just pulled to the side, rather than removed completely, and some nice, sexy heels and stockings that stay on for as long as possible.

2. If the girl has tattoos (which I dislike), leaving some of her clothes on can be a good way to cover them up.

3. If it's a girl I have already seen more than once or twice, seeing her getting fucked in different clothes makes it seem almost like I'm watching a new girl.

But in any case, I prefer not to ever see the girl strip totally nude early in the scene, unless the outfit she's wearing is really ugly.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:1. If her outfit is particularly sexy, like a short skirt that is just pulled up to her waist, with her thong just pulled to the side, rather than removed completely, and some nice, sexy heels and stockings that stay on for as long as possible.

+1! I'd take high heels over bare feet any day, additionally I find belts, collars and in some cases bras on otherwise naked women immensely sexy. Fitting lingerie almost always adds to a girls attractiveness, full nudity (except feet, heels always win) is better than cheap-looking/too much clothing though.

Not into the fully clothed female look at all (and there are a few other sites that offer that kind of thing already, if I was). I definitely like when they start off in sexy outfits, though. I just want them to be mostly out of them at least somewhere in the video. I absolutely HATE it when the girl wears a top covering her tits for the ENTIRE video.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:I [...] like a short skirt that is just pulled up to her waist, with her thong just pulled to the side, rather than removed completely,...

+1 :-)

mb2014 wrote:Hello,

i don't know how others see this point, but i don't buy any videos where girls keep wearing any clothes, shoes etc. That turns me off. I see clothes enough every day in the "normal life" - i dont't want to see them while people are fucking.

For me (and all my friends also is fact): I would buy a lot more from you if so much girls would not where clothes.

Looks like you and your 'friends' are in the minority from your own poll!

Clothes ain't too bad, but why the fuck keep tits covered whole scene? And sometimes when the girls have nice figure it is really bumming me out she don't go full nude.

utopiaa wrote:Clothes ain't too bad, but why the fuck keep tits covered whole scene?

I don't get that either. Take Tiffany Shine, for example. She has three scenes on here, and all of them are with her tits covered the whole scene. Why the fuck do that? It really irritated the shit out of me, especially since we don't get to see a lot of girls on here with big tits.

As far as the poll is concerned, I don't like seeing the girls fully nude. So I vote No. I like seeing them dressed in slutty lingerie, stockings, and high heels. It already annoys me when they take their shoes off during the scene when I prefer that they leave them on. I especially like when the girls leave their panties on so the guy can fuck them with their panties pulled to the side. That's really hot to watch.

The poll shows that we don't want them fully nude. cool! i'm not alone.
Personally, i prefer model wearing all the time :

open high heels + ripped tights or even better leggings (white) like Blanche Bradburry was wearing + underwear on the side = win win scene!!!

Girls should be fully nude, in the end.

Apparently, these polls aren't taken very seriously, as this one shows that 63% want the girls to keep some clothes on during the sex. Yet, of the last 20 Gonzo scenes released, 14 of them have the girls getting totally nude before the guys even show up.

That's 70% of the recent scenes that go against the wishes of the majority. Why???

I don't really need them to always be nude, but at some point be nude would be great. I can't stand the shoes. Most of the time they're nothing but unclassy, boring, black shoes. And why do people want to hide feet, like they are gross and ugly. There are girls I would rather not see their face than their feet personally.

But anyhow, again, why can't people who like shoes balance with others who don't like them. Start with shoes, and then some time before the end of the scene get them off for those who don't like? And don't say it's because of how her feet positions make her body different. You can do the same body positions by her feet. Feet with high shoes look silly when used on a couch...more than on the floor for sure when starting. Plus most of the girl positions in the scene are not squatting or standing on her feet. Most positions have nothing to do with her feet position to make her body different, so why then waste the beautiful girl body part? You like girls but want to hide feet? Why not hide hands? Why just feet?

Anyhow, yes I want mostly nude, but a little bit of clothes or whatever at the beginning is fine for me.

angelnomiluvr wrote:I don't really need them to always be nude, but at some point be nude would be great. I can't stand the shoes. Most of the time they're nothing but unclassy, boring, black shoes. And why do people want to hide feet, like they are gross and ugly. There are girls I would rather not see their face than their feet personally.

But anyhow, again, why can't people who like shoes balance with others who don't like them. Start with shoes, and then some time before the end of the scene get them off for those who don't like? And don't say it's because of how her feet positions make her body different. You can do the same body positions by her feet. Feet with high shoes look silly when used on a couch...more than on the floor for sure when starting. Plus most of the girl positions in the scene are not squatting or standing on her feet. Most positions have nothing to do with her feet position to make her body different, so why then waste the beautiful girl body part? You like girls but want to hide feet? Why not hide hands? Why just feet?

Anyhow, yes I want mostly nude, but a little bit of clothes or whatever at the beginning is fine for me.

We can have the debate about feet vs. shoes somewhere else. (For the record, I think they have been doing pretty good with that particular balancing act lately).

What I'm talking about here is not shoes, but clothes (e.g. leaving the stockings on, panties just pulled to the side instead of being totally removed, etc.). That's a separate issue from the shoes.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:

angelnomiluvr wrote:I don't really need them to always be nude, but at some point be nude would be great. I can't stand the shoes. Most of the time they're nothing but unclassy, boring, black shoes. And why do people want to hide feet, like they are gross and ugly. There are girls I would rather not see their face than their feet personally.

But anyhow, again, why can't people who like shoes balance with others who don't like them. Start with shoes, and then some time before the end of the scene get them off for those who don't like? And don't say it's because of how her feet positions make her body different. You can do the same body positions by her feet. Feet with high shoes look silly when used on a couch...more than on the floor for sure when starting. Plus most of the girl positions in the scene are not squatting or standing on her feet. Most positions have nothing to do with her feet position to make her body different, so why then waste the beautiful girl body part? You like girls but want to hide feet? Why not hide hands? Why just feet?

Anyhow, yes I want mostly nude, but a little bit of clothes or whatever at the beginning is fine for me.

We can have the debate about feet vs. shoes somewhere else. (For the record, I think they have been doing pretty good with that particular balancing act lately).

What I'm talking about here is not shoes, but clothes (e.g. leaving the stockings on, panties just pulled to the side instead of being totally removed, etc.). That's a separate issue from the shoes.

Well it did say nude, and shoes means not nude to me. But I will leave it at that, no problem, it's your thread

ruptureherrectum wrote:There's nothing sexier than a gorgeous woman dressed in a business suit with skirt and black stocking and heels. There's too much teasing at the beginning (who the hell watches that anyway); instead the guys should just come and rip her clothes off like a pack of wolves, leaving on only the heels stockings and hiked up skirt. During the scenes the heels should fall off naturally insteading of being taken off and hopefully after an hour of pounding the stockings will end up a little ripped. Remember, everything should be natural natural natural don't force anything.

yeah i woud love to see it like that!

I dont care as long as anything they might wear does not obstruct access to their holes.

I do not understand why the scenes of Legalporno during this 2015 not conform to this survey. In Gonzo.com, for example, from January to May only in the 23% of the scenes "X on 1" the actress has finished completely naked.

Anyway I do not like the survey. There should be more points, not everything is black or white. It's a shame that in Legalporno have chosen to decrease in excess the least voted option instead of adjusting the percentages of the survey.

As long as her boobs are out, I'm OK. I only get pissed when her tits never come out (and that goes for small-titted girls too). As a tit fan this sucks for me.

I like what I like, just as does everyone else. But why are so many people unwilling to share? It's like everyone needs to go back to kindergarten and learn to cooperate.

I like nude, I like the girl, and her body. I can't for the life of me feel more in love with a piece of clothing than the person wearing it, the girl herself. But I understand some people care more about the clothes than the girl. I will happily take clothes for half or more than half the scene to accommodate them.

I like feet. I want to see them, and one of my favorite parts to every scene (when it happens) is when the girl or guy takes the shoes off. In fact if I am watching or fast-forwarding and I notice somewhere after the fact that the shoes are now off, I rewind to watch that part. When I see girls wearing shoes for the whole seen, I find myself distracted and bored, 'Why would they keep them on for the entire 45+ mins?! Take them off already! Who wears heals to squat cowgirl on a nice leather couch,' and other such thoughts come to mind. But I will happily watch half the scene with shoes on for those who like them.

Just like Brut... I am not a boob guy at all. I like small or med tits only, anything fake or large, often I won't even download. But a hundred times I would stand with him to have boob shots at least SOME time during a scene. Come on! Hiding the very organs that make a girl a girl (one of a few I know)?! I think anyone who wants clothes on all the time is messed up (being facetious there fyi) I think by ending with the girl undressed you are supporting the guys who like tits, feet, navels, elbows, the backs of knees, whatever it is.

I don't understand this constant need for people to have all scenes to be all of what they want. Am I the only one who sees that as selfish?

I love the nice lingerie during warmup, but I like seeing the clothes come off during the course of the scene, ending in nudity or near nudity by the time of the popshot.

I find it tedious that people keep repeating the same things, making the same straw man arguments ("Oh, you must like the clothes more than the girl..."), etc.

I asked earlier here, and no one answered, so I'll ask again: If having any part of the girl's body covered is such a turn-off, does that mean the girls should take their earrings off, so you can see their earlobes in all their naked glory? Or can you just admit that maybe, just maybe, what a girl is wearing can actually enhance, rather than detract from, her beauty?

And as far as taking the shoes or clothes off halfway through the scene, that's bullshit, as the first third of the scene is usually just the warmup. So, what you're basically asking for is for (at least) 75% of the actual sex to be totally nude. So, who's being selfish?

Can you just admit that maybe this thread has nothing to do with winning an argument?

If you prefer one style over the other, that's pretty much the end of the discussion. You state your preference and move on. No amount of clever rhetoric is going to change people's tastes.

evil-pineapples wrote:Can you just admit that maybe this thread has nothing to do with winning an argument?

If you prefer one style over the other, that's pretty much the end of the discussion. You state your preference and move on. No amount of clever rhetoric is going to change people's tastes.

I'm not the one who brought it back up, after the thread had been lying dormant for months.