PornBox.com

I think LP is one of the best going, and I do love the stunning young women.
But it would be good to have some 30/40 somethings as well (attractive of course!) doing the same scenes with piss, kreme, gags etc

Other peoples thoughts?

I'd like to see this as well, some sexy older women getting a good seeing to

Definitely.

Deputy wrote:it would be good to have some 30/40 somethings as well (attractive of course!) doing the same scenes with piss, kreme, gags etc

Yes.

+1

Absolutely.

No thanks

-1

yeah, girls like Linda Brown? all natural. Sure!

gapelover wrote:No thanks

Oh come on gapelover - I'm a big fan of your blog and follow you on [spam] - you've linked at least 1 scene with Simone Peach who fits my description perfectly!

OK maybe a few MILFS if they are hot

Dora Venter! ...mmmmmmmm

no thanks, Young girls with perky natural tits and shaved pussies.

DP-Lover wrote:no thanks, Young girls with perky natural tits and shaved pussies.

+1

DP-Lover wrote:no thanks, Young girls with perky natural tits and shaved pussies.

There's no reason why they can't keep shooting those kinds of girls, but also throw in a MILF every now and then. Personally, I like variety ... except when it comes to pubic hair. Young or old, I would prefer to see them all totally shaved (or waxed).

Deputy wrote:I think LP is one of the best going, and I do love the stunning young women.
But it would be good to have some 30/40 somethings as well (attractive of course!) doing the same scenes with piss, kreme, gags etc

Other peoples thoughts?

Yes, please.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:

DP-Lover wrote:no thanks, Young girls with perky natural tits and shaved pussies.

There's no reason why they can't keep shooting those kinds of girls, but also throw in a MILF every now and then. Personally, I like variety ... except when it comes to pubic hair. Young or old, I would prefer to see them all totally shaved (or waxed).

I hear ya! Veronica Avluv is probably one of the sexiest MILFs out there. Hope they get her with some Anal toys ATM. Something I haven't seen yet. And if she does, it's typically a cheat. Camera changes etc.

Suzie Carina?

Gabriella Gucci please

+1, as long as they are sexy and great performers age is nothing but a number!

Yep, stick to younger girls, a MILF is okay every once in a while.

We'll shoot some MILFs every once in a while. The last ones did fine.

that new model Carmen Sweet - 902 from UM also? she looks great

yep more older babes would be fine

Bring back Sophie Lynx!

xxx wrote:We'll shoot some MILFs every once in a while. The last ones did fine.

Hey xxx! Can you bring back Kika to the studio?, one of the prettiest down there!

Tastes Like Ass wrote:There's no reason why they can't keep shooting those kinds of girls, but also throw in a MILF every now and then. Personally, I like variety ... except when it comes to pubic hair. Young or old, I would prefer to see them all totally shaved (or waxed).

But shooting old broads would be a change to LP formula. And we can't have LP changing its formula to appeal to just one fetish, now can we? Isn't that what you're always saying?

I'm not into old broads. So the whole "MILF" thing, which is usually a misnomer anyway, does nothing for me. It's bad enough that LP shoots mostly pale flat-chested girls who have the figure of a beanpole. I watch porn because I like to see sexy young girls with big tits and nice asses get fucked. But those of us who like tits and ass appear to be in the minority on this site. Yet, I deal with it anyway. Even though I find a lot of the regular girls on here unattractive, the hardcore sex with things like cream and gangbangs make up for it. So I'm still here.

But now, on top of the of the pale Olive Oyl look-alikes that some of you guys love, you guys are requesting that LP bring on a bunch of haggard old broads. So then, this will be a site full of pasty chicks with no tits and no ass, and old wrinkled broads with blown-out vags. I don't want to judge other peoples' preferences. But really, What the Fuck!?

realtip wrote:But shooting old broads would be a change to LP formula.

Actually, it wouldn't. As I explained on another thread a while back, the LP formula has never been about a certain type of girl, but rather, about a certain type of sex.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:

realtip wrote:But shooting old broads would be a change to LP formula.

Actually, it wouldn't. As I explained on another thread a while back, the LP formula has never been about a certain type of girl, but rather, about a certain type of sex.

Good. Then by all means let's see some delicious Milfs.
I find that some of the younger girls appearing in LP scenes are clearly uncomfortable with the things they are asked to do (rimming, peeing, even ATM). Milfs on the other hand, generally, know what they like and where their boundaries are and appear far more relaxed and into what they are doing on screen.
So yes, bring them on.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:Actually, it wouldn't. As I explained on another thread a while back, the LP formula has never been about a certain type of girl, but rather, about a certain type of sex.

Neither would a lot of the other suggestions you oppose change LP formula, such as adding more rough aggressive sex. Yet, you still claim they would. Just as I suspected, the whole thing about not wanting to change "LP formula" is just an excuse to oppose those changes you personally don't like. But if it's something you do like, such as shooting more old broads, then it doesn't constitute a change, according to you.

Edmund03 wrote:I find that some of the younger girls appearing in LP scenes are clearly uncomfortable with the things they are asked to do (rimming, peeing, even ATM).

That's the whole appeal of it. Seeing hot young sexy girls get pushed into doing all the nasty shit that they probably wouldn't otherwise do is part of what's so great about watching it. And yes, seeing them express natural reactions and reluctance to it does make it hotter to watch, as that's exactly the way most girls would react in real life. I don't want to see a bunch of old shot-out broads who are so jaded from doing everything there is to do that nothing is new to them. I'd rather see a hot young chick express a natural reaction to having a huge dick shoved up her ass than to see some old broad whose ass has been fucked so many times that she can fit two jumbo jets up there without even feeling it.

As for pissing, how many normal people actually want someone pissing on them? Unless you just believe everything you see in porn and think that girls really enjoy getting pissed on, then you know that most people would consider it degrading. Therefore, seeing a sexy girl express a natural disdain for having guys piss on her, but does it anyway just to please her male partners, is so much hotter than seeing some worn-out broad whose been pissed on so many times that it's now no different from taking a morning shower.

I love seeing sexy new girls do things they've never done before, or wouldn't ordinarily do, and express natural reactions to them. On the other hand, if it's some old worn-out whore who can take 50 dicks up her ass and laughingly chug down gallons of piss all without flinching like it's something she does everyday, then that's just boring to me.

Yeah, count me in! I want to see those beautiful MILFs given the LP treatment!

realtip wrote:But shooting old broads would be a change to LP formula. And we can't have LP changing its formula to appeal to just one fetish, now can we? Isn't that what you're always saying?

Can we please stop talking about the fucking LP formula? Just say you're not into MILFs and leave it at that.

I'm not into old broads. So the whole "MILF" thing, which is usually a misnomer anyway, does nothing for me.

See? That wasn't so hard.

Present it as your own opinion and not as something objective like "the LP formula."

But now, on top of the of the pale Olive Oyl look-alikes that some of you guys love, you guys are requesting that LP bring on a bunch of haggard old broads.

1) Not all MILFs are "haggard old broads." Jesus...

2) LP has already shot with several stars who can qualify as "MILFs" in the porn definition of the word (i.e. over the age of 30). You've never complained about that.

3) Olive Oyl? Seriously? When the hell were you born? Are you collecting Social Security yet?

Neither would a lot of the other suggestions you oppose change LP formula, such as adding more rough aggressive sex. Yet, you still claim they would.

Clearly, "the LP formula" is not agreed upon by anybody here. We all have our own reasons for coming to this site. For instance:

Edmund03 wrote:I find that some of the younger girls appearing in LP scenes are clearly uncomfortable with the things they are asked to do (rimming, peeing, even ATM).

That's the whole appeal of it. Seeing hot young sexy girls get pushed into doing all the nasty shit that they probably wouldn't otherwise do is part of what's so great about watching it. And yes, seeing them express natural reactions and reluctance to it does make it hotter to watch, as that's exactly the way most girls would react in real life.

No, realtip.

That's not "the whole appeal" of this site. Porn should be fun, not some Nick Manning anger fest. (Thanks, crema. Priceless words, and they're very true.) Some struggling can be sexy, but not to the misogynist extent that you seem to enjoy it. Great directors in porn history, like Rocco Siffredi, understand this. They push the girls, but they also go out of their way to make the experience fun for them. Otherwise, there's no eroticism. It's just pathetic hurtcore bullshit.

But what do you expect from a guy who enjoys Max Hardcore's unique brand of nonsense? "Ooh, Daddy, please don't choke me with your penis, I'm only twelve years old!" What a sick son of a bitch. If I ever see that bullshit on LP, I'm done. I will walk.

evil-pineapples wrote:Present it as your own opinion and not as something objective like "the LP formula."

Either you're just completely out of the loop and not aware of the context of that comment, or you're just terrible at picking up on sarcasm. Maybe both.

1) Not all MILFs are "haggard old broads." Jesus...

2) LP has already shot with several stars who can qualify as "MILFs" in the porn definition of the word (i.e. over the age of 30). You've never complained about that.

3) Olive Oyl? Seriously? When the hell were you born? Are you collecting Social Security yet?

1) True. Actually, if you take the term MILF by its literal definition, then none of them would be haggard old broads. But in the context of porn, that's exactly what it means. Technically, a woman can be a MILF at age 20, or at any age, young or old. In porn, however, MILF is just a polite code word for old shot-out whores who have been in the business too long, and has nothing to do with its actual definition. That's why it's a misnomer. Most of them are not even really mothers, and if they are, they're usually not ones I'd like to fuck (what MILF really stands for). They're just too old to be hired for anything else, so they're erroneously called "MILFS" as an excuse for them to keep getting work. If the porn definiton of MILF matched the real definition of MILF, then I wouldn't have a problem with it.

2) I never complained about it because I don't give a damn about age as long as she's hot. She can be 18 or 40, as long as she's sexy. But if you insist that LP go out of its way to specifically start bringing on more old broads just for the sake of appealing to some MILF niche, then that's just stupid. Bring girls on here because they're hot and sexy, not just because of their age.

3) Right, because you have to be old to know who Popeye and Olive Oyl are. It's not like they're still huge pop culture icons or anything. I'm sure kids in elementary school have never heard of them. You know there's another cartoon character by the name of Mickey Mouse that was created before Popeye and Olive Oyl were. I suppose you've never heard of Mickey either since you're apparently not aware of anything that was created before you were born. By the way, this is all sarcasm, since you're so terrible at picking up on it.

That's not "the whole appeal" of this site. Porn should be fun, not some Nick Manning anger fest. (Thanks, crema. Priceless words, and they're very true.) Some struggling can be sexy, but not to the misogynist extent that you seem to enjoy it. Great directors in porn history, like Rocco Siffredi, understand this. They push the girls, but they also go out of their way to make the experience fun for them. Otherwise, there's no eroticism. It's just pathetic hurtcore bullshit.

But what do you expect from a guy who enjoys Max Hardcore's unique brand of nonsense? "Ooh, Daddy, please don't choke me with your penis, I'm only twelve years old!" What a sick son of a bitch. If I ever see that bullshit on LP, I'm done. I will walk.

Yes, because only what YOU like matters. Again, this is sarcasm, since I have to point it out to you.

I mentioned earlier in the thread that I don't want to judge other peoples' preferences. But since that's apparently the direction you want to go, then I have no problem telling you that your taste in porn is shitty. It's also quite laughable that you're here on a porn site (multiple porn sites actually) calling someone else a "sick son of a bitch." What does that make you?

Fortunately, the opinions of ignorant hypocrites are worthless to me. At least I can respect the anti-porn crusaders who don't watch porn at all. I may disagree with them, but they're not hypocrites. You're just as bad as the murderer who tries to judge someone else for stealing. You're ridiculous.

Wow. Are you retarded?

realtip wrote:Either you're just completely out of the loop and not aware of the context of that comment, or you're just terrible at picking up on sarcasm. Maybe both.

Oh no. I picked up on the part of your comment that was intended to be sarcasm. I simply wasn't talking about that part.

Truth be told, I'm amazed you're even capable of sarcasm.

In porn, however, MILF is just a polite code word for old shot-out whores who have been in the business too long, and has nothing to do with its actual definition.

LOL. Not necessarily. I've seen hot MILFs advertised as MILFs in porn movies. But hotness is subjective. You probably wouldn't agree with me since our tastes diverge so strongly.

I never complained about it because I don't give a damn about age as long as she's hot. She can be 18 or 40, as long as she's sexy. But if you insist that LP go out of its way to specifically start bringing on more old broads just for the sake of appealing to some MILF niche, then that's just stupid. Bring girls on here because they're hot and sexy, not just because of their age.

Some guys think age is sexy.

Right, because you have to be old to know who Popeye and Olive Oyl are.

Popeye has been deader than dead as a pop culture icon since that shitty live-action movie killed the franchise in the '80s. I can pretty much guarantee that in a random sample of people under the age of 25, less than 1% of them will have any idea who Olive Oyl is. People know about Popeye, that he's a sailor who gets strong when he eats spinach, and that's pretty much all they know.

Yes, because only what YOU like matters.

Of course not, but it is my opinion, and I'm doing business with this company, so I will make my voice heard. I don't see how that's inappropriate or out-of-place in this particular forum of discussion.

The difference is that I present my own opinion as my own opinion. I don't bullshit about how it's "probably" what everyone else thinks.

I mentioned earlier tin the thread that i don't want to jude other peoples' preferences.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You judge other people's preferences all the time.

But since that's apparently the direction you want to go, then I have no problem telling you that your taste in porn is shitty.

Coming from you, I take that as a compliment. You have some of the very worst taste in porn I've ever encountered.

It's also quite laughable that you're here on a porn site (two porn sites actually) calling someone else a "sick son of a bitch." What does that make you?

See, this is another difference between you and me. You view porn as something shameful. I don't. Everybody watches porn, especially these days. Sex is nothing to be ashamed of.

However, what I do believe to be shameful is porn featuring women who pretend to be underage girls with some sick fucker doing everything he can to make them uncomfortable and subject them to pain. To me, that's not sex. It's just violence, misogyny, and barely repressed pedophilia.

There is no hypocrisy here. I am not here to see that type of porn. Maybe it's why YOU are here, but not me, and I know several others on this forum agree with me.

That said, I do (reluctantly) respect your right to watch that material, but that doesn't mean I'm obligated to petition LP to make it for you, and it certainly doesn't mean I have to think highly of you for being into that sickness.

Fortunately, the opinions of ignorant hypocrites are worthless to me. At least I can respect the anti-porn crusaders who don't watch porn at all. I may disagree with them, but they're not hypocrites. You're just as bad the murderer who tries to judge someone else for stealing. You're ridiculous.

I'm not an anti-porn crusader. You have absolutely zero ability to separate your own views and opinions from those of others. I'm convinced at this point that it's literally beyond your ability to comprehend.

evil-pineapples wrote:Wow. Are you retarded?

No, but I might end up that way if I keep wasting brain cells on the likes of you. As the old saying goes, "Never argue with an idiot as people may not be able to tell the difference."

For this reason, I have decided not to waste time replying to the rest of your post as I normally would. Sure, it's quite easy to go back and forth tearing apart your illogical hogwash point by point. But what good would it do, and why should I continue to cast pearls before swine?

To reiterate, you're ridiculous.

Wow. I think I just broke realtip.

evil-pineapples wrote:Wow. I think I just broke realtip.

Nah. You're just not worth the time right now.

But go ahead and keep thinking that if it helps you to feel better about yourself.

realtip wrote:

Tastes Like Ass wrote:Actually, it wouldn't. As I explained on another thread a while back, the LP formula has never been about a certain type of girl, but rather, about a certain type of sex.

Neither would a lot of the other suggestions you oppose change LP formula, such as adding more rough aggressive sex. Yet, you still claim they would. Just as I suspected, the whole thing about not wanting to change "LP formula" is just an excuse to oppose those changes you personally don't like. But if it's something you do like, such as shooting more old broads, then it doesn't constitute a change, according to you.

Your reading comprehension is absolutely terrible. I repeat: the LP formula has never been about a certain type of girl, but rather, about a certain type of sex. In other words, it doesn't matter if the girls they shoot are older, younger, skinnier, curvier, black, white, Latin, Asian, etc., as long as the sex itself stays the same as it has always been. On the other hand, if they start catering to every fetish that anyone suggests, they'll wind up like Evil Angel, where about 90% of the scenes that they release are weird niche material that only appeals to a very small group of people.

And, as I have said many times before, my personal preferences have nothing to do with it. For example, I like prolapse stuff, but I've never pressured LP to shoot it, because it's not part of their traditional formula. On the other hand, I hate the stupid stacking crap (since it creates terrible camera angles and makes ATM virtually impossible), but I still tolerate it, because, unlike prolapse (or your rape fantasy crap), it has always been a part of the LP formula.

Edmund03 wrote:I find that some of the younger girls appearing in LP scenes are clearly uncomfortable with the things they are asked to do (rimming, peeing, even ATM).

That's the whole appeal of it. Seeing hot young sexy girls get pushed into doing all the nasty shit that they probably wouldn't otherwise do is part of what's so great about watching it. And yes, seeing them express natural reactions and reluctance to it does make it hotter to watch, as that's exactly the way most girls would react in real life. I don't want to see a bunch of old shot-out broads who are so jaded from doing everything there is to do that nothing is new to them. I'd rather see a hot young chick express a natural reaction to having a huge dick shoved up her ass than to see some old broad whose ass has been fucked so many times that she can fit two jumbo jets up there without even feeling it.

As for pissing, how many normal people actually want someone pissing on them? Unless you just believe everything you see in porn and think that girls really enjoy getting pissed on, then you know that most people would consider it degrading. Therefore, seeing a sexy girl express a natural disdain for having guys piss on her, but does it anyway just to please her male partners, is so much hotter than seeing some worn-out broad whose been pissed on so many times that it's now no different from taking a morning shower.

I love seeing sexy new girls do things they've never done before, or wouldn't ordinarily do, and express natural reactions to them. On the other hand, if it's some old worn-out whore who can take 50 dicks up her ass and laughingly chug down gallons of piss all without flinching like it's something she does everyday, then that's just boring to me.

This perfectly summarizes the difference between you and I, and demonstrates my point about how your "rape fantasy" crap would be a drastic change to the LP formula. Apparently, all your fantasies involve making girls miserable. My fantasies, on the other hand, never involve any sort of suffering or misery. Rather, they involve the kind of naturally submissive sluts who are perfectly happy to do whatever it takes to please a guy. You, however, view these girls as "boring" and prefer prudes that have to be forced to do nasty things. After all, if they do it willingly, then there's no suffering and misery involved, and that's obviously what gets you off.

So, LP has two choices. They can either continue to do what they have always done, and show girls being willingly submissive, or they can do what you want, and show girls being forced and coerced, and essentially being dragged kicking and screaming through the scene, which is exactly the opposite of what they have always done. Fortunately, I'm pretty sure you're in the minority on this one, although I'm equally sure you will never acknowledge that fact.

Sigh! I said I wasn't going to do this, but maybe TLA isn't as much of a lost cause as EP is. We'll see.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:I repeat: the LP formula has never been about a certain type of girl, but rather, about a certain type of sex. In other words, it doesn't matter if the girls they shoot are older, younger, skinnier, curvier, black, white, Latin, Asian, etc., as long as the sex itself stays the same as it has always been.

To the contrary, it is about a certain type of girl. How else do you explain all the girls on here looking almost the same with no variety among appearance? Also, go take a look at the boobjob thread and see how many people based their opposition to girls with boobjobs on the claim that fake tits don't belong on LP. Apparently, many of the guys here feel that only scrawny pale white girls with small tits should be shot for LP, and that girls with fake tits do not fit in with the "LP formula," which is no different from your claim that rough sex doesn't fit in with the "LP formula."

Basically, anything that someone doesn't like can be argued as not being apart of the "LP formula," which is why this "LP formula" nonsense is all bullshit. If you don't like something, then just say you don't like it. But quit it with the "LP formula" bullshit. evil-pineapples may be an idiot, but that's one thing I agree with him about.

And, as I have said many times before, my personal preferences have nothing to do with it.

Of course they do. Our preferences have everything to do with what we want to see. If you didn't have a preference for older women, then you wouldn't be on here requesting them. If you didn't have a preference for certain sex acts, then it wouldn't matter to you whether LP shoots them or not. You may deny it because you don't want to admit that's what it really is, but it's all about preference.

For example, I like prolapse stuff, but I've never pressured LP to shoot it, because it's not part of their traditional formula.

You don't have to "pressure" them. They already shoot it. Maybe not frequently, but there are a few scenes on here that have it. Also, paying members making suggestions for what we would like to see is not "pressuring" LP to do anything. Nobody here is trying to force LP to shoot anything. Well, except for a certain asshat who has threatened to leave if LP dares to shoot anything he doesn't like. But as for the rest of us, we're just making suggestions based on what we would like to see on here, the same as you are.

On the other hand, I hate the stupid stacking crap (since it creates terrible camera angles and makes ATM virtually impossible), but I still tolerate it, because it, unlike prolapse (or your rape fantasy crap), has always been a part of the LP formula.

Shut the fuck up about the "LP formula" already. Just because LP used to do something all the time doesn't make it part of some supposed "formula." Companies are allowed to be creative and change things up from time to time. Going by your way of thinking, there's a lot of stuff that LP wouldn't be shooting now because they were not always apart of this absurd "formula" you keep talking about.

This perfectly summarizes the difference between you and I, and demonstrates my point about how your "rape fantasy" crap would be a drastic change to the LP formula.

There you go with this "LP formula" bullshit again. You really need to come up with some new material.

My fantasies, on the other hand, never involve any sort of suffering or misery. Rather, they involve the kind of naturally submissive sluts who are perfectly happy to do whatever it takes to please a guy. You, however, view these girls as "boring" and prefer prudes that have to be forced to do nasty things. After all, if they do it willingly, then there's no suffering and misery involved, and that's obviously what gets you off.

So your fantasies are better than other peoples' fantasies? I didn't know that there was a fantasy competition. I don't particularly care what you or other people fantasize about. It's not my concern. Likewise, I have no idea why you're so concerned about what I fantasize about. So tell me, do you and evil-pineapples have matching thought police uniforms?

So, LP has two choices. They can either continue to do what they have always done, and show girls being willingly submissive, or they can do what you want, and show girls being forced and coerced, and essentially being dragged kicking and screaming through the scene, which is exactly the opposite of what they have always done. Fortunately, I'm pretty sure you're in the minority on this one, although I'm equally sure you will never acknowledge that fact.

Aside from your fanatical overexaggeration which I find too ridiculous to even bother addressing, therein lies another problem with you. You feel that there has to be a "choice." According to you, there's no room for anything other than what you like. Nobody ever said that LP had to stop shooting anything, only add to what it already shoots, the same way that it added cream, or pissing, or 0% pussy, etc.

Why does there have to be a choice between cream or piss when it can do both? Why does there have to be a choice between natural tits and fake tits when they can shoot both? Why does there have to be a choice between MILFs and young girls when there can be both as long as they're all hot? Likewise, why does there have to be a choice between rough sex and regular sex when there can be both? What the fuck is wrong with you where you keep thinking that LP has to set restrictions upon what it can shoot and can't shoot? What is this obsession you have with saying that LP should be able to shoot one thing, but not the other?

Oh right, I forgot. They're limited by the "LP formula."

realtip wrote:So your fantasies are better than other peoples' fantasies? I didn't know that there was a fantasy competition. I don't particularly care what you or other people fantasize about. It's not my concern. Likewise, I have no idea why you're so concerned about what I fantasize about. So tell me, do you and evil-pineapples have matching thought police uniforms?

Are you stupid? We're simply making our voices heard. We're using this forum as a way to let LP know what we want to see and what we don't want to see.

Nobody is telling you that you can't watch the stuff you like to watch, but we are saying that we don't want to see it here, because fuck you.

evil-pineapples wrote:We're simply making our voices heard. We're using this forum as a way to let LP know what we want to see and what we don't want to see.

So you're allowed to do that, but you have a problem when other people do it?

Do you ever get tired of being a hypocritical dumbass, or is it a full-time job for you?