PornBox.com

Guys,

I personnally think trailers are precious since it is the first video we will discover before having a crush or not for the lady or her scene.

I don't want to reinvent the wheel, therefore, I had a look to those previous topics :

Netzerkaiser : What are the best LP trailers you've ever seen?

and Tcooo, complaining about strobes : Request to not make trailers so... 'flashy'

My eyes are enough damaged because of screens (and sometimes because of porn stuffs ), I'm suporting fading

Strobes and 1/2 seconds of sequences is a kind of oppressing trailer, according to me and…. Tcooo

tcooo wrote:The image flashes every few seconds, and on top of that the camera changes angle every 1-2 seconds. Repeatedly.
Maybe I'm alone in this but this gets a bit annoying so I'll make a post and see.
I don't have epilepsy but I feel I'm getting it from watching these.

But maybe that's what you like?

You will find below the 3 choices :

Mambo's style/classic:



VK's style/fading:



Giorgio's style/strobe:

No trailer about DP/Train fuck/DAP/piss drinking/prolapse/puke?
You know my fingerprint now, 1:1/anal.

But I got a kind of power….the power to make disappear the horrible pics of zelensmonkey. Have a look to my thread here:most beautiful escort you met

you will see that the scary pics disappeared. Kudos to the Admins for their reactivity

I already have zelensmonkey and his many aliases all set to "ignore", which maintains my tranquility

I like trailers which just do their job, which I think is to give a mini guided tour of what to expect if we buy the scene.

I hate:

- Scenes with no trailer
- Scenes where only the first 30 seconds of nothingness is shown, because nobody bothered to make a trailer
- Flashing strobe and fancy video effects which attempt to look exciting, but just give me a headache
- Cutting backwards and forwards through the scene timeline (Gonzo) which just looks chaotic and confusing
- Running out of ideas after 20 seconds of trailer so they just repeat what they already showed, to fill up space

avanfurwet wrote:I already have zelensmonkey and his many aliases all set to "ignore", which maintains my tranquility

I like trailers which just do their job, which I think is to give a mini guided tour of what to expect if we buy the scene.

I hate:

- Scenes with no trailer
- Scenes where only the first 30 seconds of nothingness is shown, because nobody bothered to make a trailer
- Flashing strobe and fancy video effects which attempt to look exciting, but just give me a headache
- Cutting backwards and forwards through the scene timeline (Gonzo) which just looks chaotic and confusing
- Running out of ideas after 20 seconds of trailer so they just repeat what they already showed, to fill up space

Perfect reply.

GatosNunez wrote:

avanfurwet wrote:I already have zelensmonkey and his many aliases all set to "ignore", which maintains my tranquility

I like trailers which just do their job, which I think is to give a mini guided tour of what to expect if we buy the scene.

I hate:

- Scenes with no trailer
- Scenes where only the first 30 seconds of nothingness is shown, because nobody bothered to make a trailer
- Flashing strobe and fancy video effects which attempt to look exciting, but just give me a headache
- Cutting backwards and forwards through the scene timeline (Gonzo) which just looks chaotic and confusing
- Running out of ideas after 20 seconds of trailer so they just repeat what they already showed, to fill up space

Perfect reply.

+1

avanfurwet wrote:I hate:

- Scenes with no trailer
- Scenes where only the first 30 seconds of nothingness is shown, because nobody bothered to make a trailer
- Flashing strobe and fancy video effects which attempt to look exciting, but just give me a headache
- Cutting backwards and forwards through the scene timeline (Gonzo) which just looks chaotic and confusing
- Running out of ideas after 20 seconds of trailer so they just repeat what they already showed, to fill up space

wow, very efficient input

if producers could have a look...

thanks for the 8 members who participate

it looks like fading is more appreciated than strobe, but I wish to get more votes to make a conclusion

Hi Guys,

I'm supposed to stop the pool today but I add one more day for those who want to vote

only 15 people interested by trailer style?

It looks like the poll has already ended? I can't see how to vote anyway. I would have voted for the first option.

The 30s trailers that tell me nothing about a scene are just a waste of time, and mean I won't buy the scene.

For me the purpose of a trailer is for a producer to basically pitch why I should choose to buy that scene, rather than some sort of art that I appreciate in their own right. More than anything else what will get my attention is signs of real intensity/energy in the scene.

avanfurwet wrote:I already have zelensmonkey and his many aliases all set to "ignore", which maintains my tranquility

I like trailers which just do their job, which I think is to give a mini guided tour of what to expect if we buy the scene.

I hate:

- Scenes with no trailer
- Scenes where only the first 30 seconds of nothingness is shown, because nobody bothered to make a trailer
- Flashing strobe and fancy video effects which attempt to look exciting, but just give me a headache
- Cutting backwards and forwards through the scene timeline (Gonzo) which just looks chaotic and confusing
- Running out of ideas after 20 seconds of trailer so they just repeat what they already showed, to fill up space

I actually think cutting back and forward sometimes is great if the editor is an artist. I often watch scenes like that. I look in the preview and go for certain sequences. I can have five scenes going at the same time and just jump between.
I once was at a hotel where you could watch 8 channels simultaneously. I watched eight porn channels, lol!

I don’t really notice the cuts to be honest, I’m happy as long as the trailer shows what happens in the scene in a short period so I know what I’m paying for. The main LP studios do a pretty good job.

I literally just hide every studio now which has those trailers that are just the first 30 seconds of the scene. I’m never going to buy their scenes completely blind so there’s no point having them on my feed. If you’re too lazy to make a trailer, you ain’t getting my money.

Everything but not Giorgio's trailers.

But more important are the screenshots. With them you can assume or predict how much time approximately was spent for a sex position. Some trailers are "buy-baiting" clips. I have bought a lot scenes but was totally disappointed because a hot fucking moment lasted only 1 sec in the trailer and full scene. That's fucking annoying.

Giorgio is doing this very often with close-ups. You see them in the trailers, are happy and excited, buy the full scene and are fucking annoyed then... because of the 1-2 secs, only.

Ultra-Gape wrote:It looks like the poll has already ended? I can't see how to vote anyway. I would have voted for the first option.

sorry! when increasing the number of day, my brain should understand "don't write it only, go to your poll and change the number of days"

there is 2 more days for you to vote

zeusanalfreak299 wrote:But more important are the screenshots. With them you can assume or predict how much time approximately was spent for a sex position.

I used to think that but I'm sure I was corrected at some point in the past, being told that the screencaps are specifically chosen rather than just being a screen grab every so many seconds/minutes. Or at least for some studios.

thanks for voting guys!

19 votes is not really accurate to have a conclusion, but at least, for the voters, we can see that people don't like too much strobes