PornBox.com

Like the subject line says. Seriously?

Latin Teen: Alexa Lewis, prolapse
Gio: Lily Veroni, prolapse
PAF: Rebecca Sharon, prolapse
XfreaX: Tabitha Poison, prolapse
Trunk: Olivia Trunk, prolapse

And the rest is the usual amateur stuff, so also no need to check those out. This must be the easiest day of not spending any tickets since I've joined this site. Holy shit...

Vagabundo1 wrote:I would like to know how XXX can rationalize making prolapse and putting it on the cover of the website.

Yes you will attract prolapse ghouls but you will also disgust and turn away even hardened perverts and porn addicts.

How is this a money maker if it disgusts so many?

This is turning into a sort of "anti-porn" where a guy is coming to jerk off and then immediately goes limp and decides to go for a walk to get the image of a woman's guts out of his mind.

What you don't like just skip, is simple! As long as the videos are free of brutality to and disgusting treatment of women like brutal gagging, throat suffocation, drowning them them in toilet seats or bowls full of piss, or male bastards spitting into their faces, or puke, or gay & trans porn, I am more than ok with prolapse and buttroses, more, I am even getting pretty horny, all that said, I am eager to see next perverted buttrose video with milfs...

How is this a money maker if it disgusts so many?

It doesn't disgust so many. Your views are not representative of anyone else than yourself.

Like you state, it is a money maker or it wouldn't exist. It is difficult to predict markets. Who expected family porn to be one of the most successful genres in porn?

It is also important to distinguish between what sells and what is consumed. Free porn for the masses is quite vanilla. If you want to charge 5 tickets for a scene it cannot be something you could find on PornHub.

Also, if you are on a anal focused extreme porn site, expect close up of assholes, anal play, fruit shitting and the likes.

If you are disgusted, there are many, many sites that do not show prolapses, yet. Pick the one which is right for you.

This site will show less prolapsing when it doesn't sell to the many thousands who now buy it, not when single individuals request it.

YumYum74 wrote:Like the subject line says. Seriously?

Latin Teen: Alexa Lewis, prolapse
Gio: Lily Veroni, prolapse
PAF: Rebecca Sharon, prolapse
XfreaX: Tabitha Poison, prolapse
Trunk: Olivia Trunk, prolapse

And the rest is the usual amateur stuff, so also no need to check those out. This must be the easiest day of not spending any tickets since I've joined this site. Holy shit...

yes and I love it!

We're on analvids, the only site on the fucking internet that shows you real anal performance...and the reward for good anal work is buttrose/prolapse...and it's beautiful!

An anal rose shows you that the girl is destroyed, that she is a real anal whore who has been worked well, what is the problem?

Do you want to hide that? That she doesn't show it?
Go to all the other websites then, but please let us enjoy this wonderful thing and its gorgeous anal whores.

it should as that is the goal of fucking and ass, destruction.

This topic sucks

I'm with you YumYum. I hate prolapse with a passion and it's pretty much a deal-breaker for me, along with puke.

This topic is garbage

We heard you the first time.

I stand in solidarity with yumyum

I know there's people on here that like it, but my vote is no as well as I find prolapse disgusting. There's been several videos I didn't buy that I otherwise thought were hot, but had prolapse.

Unfortunately I think a lot of things in porn are driven by vocal minorities.

It's really simple.. they'll try something out probably and if it sells they will make more of it, if it doesn't they will make less. Money talks

Pboxer88 wrote:I know there's people on here that like it, but my vote is no as well as I find prolapse disgusting. There's been several videos I didn't buy that I otherwise thought were hot, but had prolapse.

Unfortunately I think a lot of things in porn are driven by vocal minorities.

How did you come to that conclusion?!

Do you think studios make porn that doesn't sell to satisfy the vocal minority?

DAP will not be banned because prolapse is giving people rectal cancer - you're being mental.

However, Anal creampies did decrease in US porn after some HIV+ cases in the industry years ago. John Stagliano also stopped Evil Angel releasing anal creampie scenes after he became HIV+. There is a higher chance of transmitting HIV with creampies.

Vagabundo1 wrote:I think there may be a case for sacrificing prolapse to save Double Anal and DP.

If the guts are falling out of these models like that, they can be exposed to HPV infection which leads to several forms of rectal cancers.

If some of these performers come down with rectal cancers and the media finds out, it will be a storm against DAP and DP/Anal.

There were many infections in U.S. Brazil porn related to anal creampies. This led to decrease of real anal cream pie for several years in U.S. porn

Major agent there forbade it, only simulated anal cream pie.

I have already declared I stand against prolapse, so you may dismiss what I say as the words of ill-intentions. BUT for those who are "indifferent" towards prolapse who are strong supporters of DAP/DP you may regret it later when DAP is forbidden due to diseases incurred through prolapse.

DAP may be forbidden along with the prolapse.

Jocke wrote:

How is this a money maker if it disgusts so many?

It doesn't disgust so many. Your views are not representative of anyone else than yourself.

Like you state, it is a money maker or it wouldn't exist. It is difficult to predict markets. Who expected family porn to be one of the most successful genres in porn?

It is also important to distinguish between what sells and what is consumed. Free porn for the masses is quite vanilla. If you want to charge 5 tickets for a scene it cannot be something you could find on PornHub.

Also, if you are on a anal focused extreme porn site, expect close up of assholes, anal play, fruit shitting and the likes.

If you are disgusted, there are many, many sites that do not show prolapses, yet. Pick the one which is right for you.

This site will show less prolapsing when it doesn't sell to the many thousands who now buy it, not when single individuals request it.

Couldn't have put it better myself...

Anal prolapse is a medical condition, but it is rare that it icreases the likelyhood of rectal cancer. Those who have rectal prolapses and at higher risk of cancer are usually only the elderly - though even there it is not common.

Vagabundo1 wrote:I think there may be a case for sacrificing prolapse to save Double Anal and DP.

If the guts are falling out of these models like that, they can be exposed to HPV infection which leads to several forms of rectal cancers.

If some of these performers come down with rectal cancers and the media finds out, it will be a storm against DAP and DP/Anal.

There were many infections in U.S. Brazil porn related to anal creampies. This led to decrease of real anal cream pie for several years in U.S. porn

Major agent there forbade it, only simulated anal cream pie.

I have already declared I stand against prolapse, so you may dismiss what I say as the words of ill-intentions. BUT for those who are "indifferent" towards prolapse who are strong supporters of DAP/DP you may regret it later when DAP is forbidden due to diseases incurred through prolapse.

DAP may be forbidden along with the prolapse.

Will you please cut out your half-baked ideas? What you're doing is potentially dangerous - you don't know what you're talking about as usual and have this insistent need to garner attention by spreading sensationalist propaganda/fear. If you want to do this shit then go to another forum or at least cite your sources when you bring up your drivel.

Jocke wrote:

Pboxer88 wrote:I know there's people on here that like it, but my vote is no as well as I find prolapse disgusting. There's been several videos I didn't buy that I otherwise thought were hot, but had prolapse.

Unfortunately I think a lot of things in porn are driven by vocal minorities.

How did you come to that conclusion?!

Do you think studios make porn that doesn't sell to satisfy the vocal minority?

So, it's definitely not a one size fits all answer. This is just my opinion.

The first question is whether or not prolapse fans are a minority. Although I suspect they are, I have no way of proving it short of a poll, and it would have to be a poll of all Avids users, not just those members who frequent the form. I can't prove it, but would venture to say that the people who like prolapse really like it, but a majority of users don't enjoy seeing inside out rectal tissue that a surgical protocologist would treat I'm not saying that to be judgmental, I could care less that other people are into it, I'm just saying you're going to lose some people. Just like you lose people with a lot of pissing.

There's an article about this somewhere regarding incest porn. The industry tested whether or not people who aren't into it would still watch it. Take a hot girl and a hot outfit and high quality filming, and make her say stepbrother 20 times, and see if it turns off the non-family porn people from watching. In most cases, vanilla people tolerate it because it's just a pet word. Then they also gain the fetish people, so more overall downloads.

Piss, buttrose and other more polarizing things are different. Here's the only way if you could know buttrose is worth it for the studio financially: (1) measure all those who are indifferent to the buttrose and buy the content for the girl anyway (2) Measure people who buy the video who would not have otherwise purchased the video if there wasn't a buttrose. (3) Measure people who don't buy the video, who would have bought it without the buttrose. . If you have more of #3 than you do of #2, it makes no sense to sell buttrose video. If you have more of #2 than #3, then it's lucrative to sell buttrose. But the problem is I doubt the studio knows which it is. So here's the kicker:

The most lucrative thing of all is to sell two versions, and this is clearly evident with piss porn. Avids is very much aware that they lose some viewers to piss content, but that they gain others. They gain more money by selling two versions. They're not going to take the time to pay someone for editing and file storage etc. for the hell of it.
Are they going to sell a buttrose and non buttrose version? I highly doubt it as that sounds pretty ridiculous, but it would technically make them more money. At the end of the day they should only do this practice for tags like piss that have the biggest swings.

Conclusion: the industry caters to the vocal minority fetishists when they know they're not losing many mainstream viewers. When they know they're losing more mainstream viewers than they are gaining fetishists, they will make more money offering two versions. If they don't know precisely how many viewers they're losing, because the content is still selling pretty well, they'll do a cost-benefit analysis of whether or not it's worth selling two versions. And then sometimes they just don't know and say, well it seems to be selling pretty well, and live with it.

If all this sounds too analytical for simply slinging porno, let's remember its a multi billion dollar industry.

Pboxer88 wrote:

Jocke wrote:

Pboxer88 wrote:I know there's people on here that like it, but my vote is no as well as I find prolapse disgusting. There's been several videos I didn't buy that I otherwise thought were hot, but had prolapse.

Unfortunately I think a lot of things in porn are driven by vocal minorities.

How did you come to that conclusion?!

Do you think studios make porn that doesn't sell to satisfy the vocal minority?

So, it's definitely not a one size fits all answer. This is just my opinion.

The first question is whether or not prolapse fans are a minority. Although I suspect they are, I have no way of proving it short of a poll, and it would have to be a poll of all Avids users, not just those members who frequent the form. I can't prove it, but would venture to say that the people who like prolapse really like it, but a majority of users don't enjoy seeing inside out rectal tissue that a surgical protocologist would treat I'm not saying that to be judgmental, I could care less that other people are into it, I'm just saying you're going to lose some people. Just like you lose people with a lot of pissing.

There's an article about this somewhere regarding incest porn. The industry tested whether or not people who aren't into it would still watch it. Take a hot girl and a hot outfit and high quality filming, and make her say stepbrother 20 times, and see if it turns off the non-family porn people from watching. In most cases, vanilla people tolerate it because it's just a pet word. Then they also gain the fetish people, so more overall downloads.

Piss, buttrose and other more polarizing things are different. Here's the only way if you could know buttrose is worth it for the studio financially: (1) measure all those who are indifferent to the buttrose and buy the content for the girl anyway (2) Measure people who buy the video who would not have otherwise purchased the video if there wasn't a buttrose. (3) Measure people who don't buy the video, who would have bought it without the buttrose. . If you have more of #3 than you do of #2, it makes no sense to sell buttrose video. If you have more of #2 than #3, then it's lucrative to sell buttrose. But the problem is I doubt the studio knows which it is. So here's the kicker:

The most lucrative thing of all is to sell two versions, and this is clearly evident with piss porn. Avids is very much aware that they lose some viewers to piss content, but that they gain others. They gain more money by selling two versions. They're not going to take the time to pay someone for editing and file storage etc. for the hell of it.
Are they going to sell a buttrose and non buttrose version? I highly doubt it as that sounds pretty ridiculous, but it would technically make them more money. At the end of the day they should only do this practice for tags like piss that have the biggest swings.

Conclusion: the industry caters to the vocal minority fetishists when they know they're not losing many mainstream viewers. When they know they're losing more mainstream viewers than they are gaining fetishists, they will make more money offering two versions. If they don't know precisely how many viewers they're losing, because the content is still selling pretty well, they'll do a cost-benefit analysis of whether or not it's worth selling two versions. And then sometimes they just don't know and say, well it seems to be selling pretty well, and live with it.

If all this sounds too analytical for simply slinging porno, let's remember its a multi billion dollar industry.

Meh, it does nothing for me. Doesn't arouse me nor bother me. My advice is to just ignore it and go back to the dicks rubbing against each other that you enjoy.

I personally love prolapse scenes and the percentage of scenes with with prolapse content over the current week is probably less than 5%. The scenes obviously sell high volumes. Sometimes the minority have the loudest voice when complaining. I suggest to use your filters and you will never see prolapse scenes on Legal Porno again and it will make your lives a lot less stressfull.

jerrybb wrote:I personally love prolapse scenes and the percentage of scenes with with prolapse content over the current week is probably less than 5%. The scenes obviously sell high volumes. Sometimes the minority have the loudest voice when complaining. I suggest to use your filters and you will never see prolapse scenes on Legal Porno again and it will make your lives a lot less stressfull.

I agree. Anyway, the director and the performer agree on what they shoot... so this thread is kind of a moot point. The only way they will stop making it is if it doesn't sell or is banned by law.

This thread got way more traction then I intended. So let me clarify, because I didn’t in my opening post. I don’t advocate banning prolapse (or anything else for that matter). Usually I just skip scenes that include prolapse (apart from the incidental remark in a model thread) and look for something else. My opening post was only referring to the releases of that specific day. I had a spectacularly shitty day and hoped a nice new scene could at least end the day on a high note. And then all major studios came out with a prolapse scene, and I boiled over. That’s all it was

Scenes with buttrose sell better than those without...not every scene has prolapse. If you want scenes without buttrose/prolapse - choose to buy those particular scenes

Yes, and if you read what I wrote, you can see that I usually do just that.

I don’t like it but I also don’t like DAP or usually 75% of what is in the scenes. I literally often only often like several minutes of a scene. The rest is filler. If someone saw my collection they wouldn’t necessarily understand I don’t even like DAP or prolapse etc but I have them anyway because some other thing attracted me to the scene enough to buy it anyway.