PornBox.com

do you think average pornstar is much prettier than average girls????

i personally think they tend to be much prettier than average

scarletxxx666 wrote:do you think average pornstar is much prettier than average girls????

i personally think they tend to be much prettier than average

No. I think its about equal.

Same here. The variety is huge just as in real life. Then of course they are dressed up and presented favourably.

The most watched porn stars are cute but not classical beauties. It seems like their personalities are just as important.

Riley Reid? Lovely girl, above average looks, but who would have guessed that she has billions of views on PH?

I like milfs with personality like Dana DeArmond, Cory Chase, Cherie Deville. All of them beautiful, none of them stunning.

It depends. LP girls- absolutely not. In fact they are mostly average, sometimes not even average. Maybe 1% of them is better than average. Then you have girls like Lana Rhoades or Tori Black who are extraordinarily beautiful. I think the less hardcore porn the more beautiful are girls generally.

analwithyourgirl wrote:It depends. LP girls- absolutely not. In fact they are mostly average, sometimes not even average. Maybe 1% of them is better than average. Then you have girls like Lana Rhoades or Tori Black who are extraordinarily beautiful. I think the less hardcore porn the more beautiful are girls generally.

agree here

I absolutely love how Sasha Grey looks like, and maybe some ypung 18-20 models
but real life girls are just less vulgar you know, just prettier

analwithyourgirl wrote:It depends. LP girls- absolutely not. In fact they are mostly average, sometimes not even average. Maybe 1% of them is better than average. Then you have girls like Lana Rhoades or Tori Black who are extraordinarily beautiful. I think the less hardcore porn the more beautiful are girls generally.

Agreed. I don't know if it is fashion, things like [spam], or if some of the extreme acts that LP studios expect that has driven away more attractive women or not or all. I think even 10 years ago, it was different. Now, many of the models I would not pay to see nude no matter what acts they perform. Thankfully, we don't all have the same tastes, because I would not want to see the site fail even if less of its offerings appeal to me.

Not really. First, most porn girls look much more average without the professional makeup for a scene.

Obviously, if you want to porn, and are good looking; you get more attention and more promotion so it seems porn has more beautiful women than real life.

If you live in a big city like I do, especially one that is multi cultural with women from all over the world, you can't go a day without seeing some smoking hot women that you wish did porn I live in a condo tower downtown and the majority of the building is renters under 30 and there are so many women that would look fucking amazing in porn. It keeps my middle aged mind busy!

analwithyourgirl wrote:It depends. LP girls- absolutely not. In fact they are mostly average, sometimes not even average. Maybe 1% of them is better than average.

im gonna pretend i didnt read that

a lot of people like to degrade others but i think is quite obvious pornstars tend to be far hotter than average

but whatever keep saying that stuff that they are average

some people try to degrade stuff in such pitiful ways

analwithyourgirl wrote:Then you have girls like Lana Rhoades or Tori Black who are extraordinarily beautiful. I think the less hardcore porn the more beautiful are girls generally.

lets play ur game

i dont see tori black extraordinarily beautiful either

the face is nice but the body is average i would say

lana rhoades i think can be matched by tons of girls in analvids
also her breasts seems fake
artificial = inferior

Well that was just my subjective opinion.

I didn't want to degrade someone, just saying how I see it.

When you say “porn stars” do you mean porn stars or girls that do porn? Porn stars are absolutely more attractive than average women, that’s mostly why they are stars. The less attractive girls that do porn don’t get noticed as much. I also think it’s true what people are saying about soft core models being more attractive generally than hardcore. Why would you take on the risks of hardcore unprotected anal sex gangbangs if you make just as much money or more from posting nude pictures online? Especially considering the attractive girls that do hardcore are gonna get it way harder from all the guys and not have as much longevity. It’s just a smart business move for them to not do hardcore if they are attractive enough to get by doing softcore

She retired in 2008, some how she performs in hundreds of titles up to and including 2021, paired in scenes with performers that entered the industry a few years ago. She looks same as in 2008..the power of video editing is big.. i smell a rat..

Interesting OP question, missed that one!
I think without MU not, also including LP girls, but that was clearly not main subject here. See thread subject!
Anyway, for me LP girls are prettier than average girls because they are so anal-friendly. But taken 3 steps back to RL and only that, looking around near Charles Bridge or anywhere else in Europe, I'd say, no, they arnt, they are average like all girls, but like all girls at some point of your life they could become very pretty and very special to you as well as average girls can become that, too.

In my experience if a woman is above average sexy hottie attractive she will have sex for money at some point in her life. It just happens naturally because why not. I you have the goods you may as well use them.

dap-addict wrote:Interesting OP question, missed that one!
I think without MU not, also including LP girls, but that was clearly not main subject here. See thread subject!
Anyway, for me LP girls are prettier than average girls because they are so anal-friendly. But taken 3 steps back to RL and only that, looking around near Charles Bridge or anywhere else in Europe, I'd say, no, they arnt, they are average like all girls, but like all girls at some point of your life they could become very pretty and very special to you as well as average girls can become that, too.

I watch the Giorgio Grandi BTS compilations to enjoy how pretty the models look, just being cheerful in their everyday clothes, before they get into MU and change into their pornstar costumes.

Yes, porn stars are much prettier than average girls. If you look at the average girl where I live (a certain Western country with a fairly high rate of obesity), then there is no doubt that porn stars are MUCH prettier than the average girl!

As someone who has met (seen in person) many pornstars, I was a airline employee but got axed (antivaxer lol),, Some are much prettier on video than in person, Riley Reid comes to mind not pretty at all Tina Kay also.. some are more pretty in person, Kate Rich, July Sun, Janice Giffith super cute in person. and in every case all them are surpisingly petite. In all my years I only once saw the name on the Passport was the same as their porn name.. Many of the men have passports in the same name. Airlines do very well (surprisingly ) in privacy concerns with respect to that..

Of course they are. The vast majority of porn stars are pretty and in great shape. This makes them objectively far more attractive than the average woman.

However, there's a significant deviation in attractiveness in porn. While few are beautiful, some definitely are.

I tend to think European girls are prettier than US girls but girls from the US are better performers. I think this is because money still remains a bigger pull in Eastern Europe/Russia. For example, an average wage is far lower than what you could earn in pornography. This is less so in the US so there are other reasons why US girls become porn stars.

Having said all that, Eastern Europe/Russia is more developed than it was 25 years ago so the wage disparity isn't as large and the pull to do porn isn't as great. That's why girls in the late 90's/early 2000's were comparatively more attractive than they are now.

I don't know what kind of crack some of you are smoking. Pornstars are obviously prettier than average girls on average. Agencies turn down "normal" looking girls all the time if they have too much weight on them or if they have curves in the wrong places, or for any variety of reasons (which a shit ton of women in the general population have these issues). Plane Janes don't get consistent work, with maybe a few exceptions for those that do the most extreme of the extreme sex acts on camera. I don't know what kind of modeling agency town heaven you must be living in to say that average girls on the street are prettier than pornstars. Are SOME of them? Obviously, but not on average.

Pboxer88 wrote:I don't know what kind of crack some of you are smoking. Pornstars are obviously prettier than average girls on average. Agencies turn down "normal" looking girls all the time (...)

God help us if LP/AV girls are supposed to be the prettiest....
I can throw darts into the crowd every day on my way to work, and I hit prettier, cuter, more atttractive girls than I see - especially at LP/AV. Agencies don't turn anyone down. They take anyone who is still willing to prostitute themselves in front of the camera in this sleazy business and do all the circus acts.

Paizal wrote:

Pboxer88 wrote:I don't know what kind of crack some of you are smoking. Pornstars are obviously prettier than average girls on average. Agencies turn down "normal" looking girls all the time (...)

God help us if LP/AV girls are supposed to be the prettiest....
I can throw darts into the crowd every day on my way to work, and I hit prettier, cuter, more atttractive girls than I see - especially at LP/AV. Agencies don't turn anyone down. They take anyone who is still willing to prostitute themselves in front of the camera in this sleazy business and do all the circus acts.

This is just fucking nonsense. Yes, there are pretty girls in life but I'd say at the age of 20, probably only 25% of them are attractive enough to do porn. By 25, this has dropped to probably 15% and by 30 it's likely down to 10%. Most girls just don't keep themselves in the kind of shape required to be in porn particularly as they get older and their metabolism starts to slow and they gradually put on weight.

You've also got to remember that the camera is brutal and on average, you look 10 pounds heavier on camera than you do in real life. The camera will catch all kinds of imperfections and so if a girl's dress size is bigger than a Size 8/10 UK, she's not going to have a career in pornography (unless she's very tall). I'd say 30% of women at 20 years old are that size but at 30 years old, it's a miniscule number. Probably under 5%.

Someone like Kira Viburn is way beyond average attractiveness: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/364941

As is Kaira Love: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/216851

I sometimes have the impression that many here have no idea about real life girls. Reference to profile pictures of girls and the explanation that this girl is so much prettier than many of the girls out there. Here's a suggestion - just turn off the Internet and enter real life.

And always the argument, with women over 30 in real life. When I think of older women in the porn business, I think of completely botched breast surgeries and a worn out appearance. Of course, there are also many pretty girls in Porn. But not to the extent they were 10+ years ago. Especially not at LP/AV where everything is getting trashier.

Paizal wrote:I sometimes have the impression that many here have no idea about real life girls. Reference to profile pictures of girls and the explanation that this girl is so much prettier than many of the girls out there. Here's a suggestion - just turn off the Internet and enter real life.

And always the argument, with women over 30 in real life. When I think of older women in the porn business, I think of completely botched breast surgeries and a worn out appearance. Of course, there are also many pretty girls in Porn. But not to the extent they were 10+ years ago. Especially not at LP/AV where everything is getting trashier.

Mate, I'm 42, have been married for 6 years (in a relationship for 11), had 8 previous girlfriends, and over 30 one night stands so know a little bit of how women in porn compare to women in the real world. I don't need to be condescended to thanks very much. I've had sex with very attractive women and sex with absolute munters and everything in between.

I've about 25 close friends (90% of male). About 20 are in marriages or long term relationships, none of their wifes/girlfriends are attractive or slim enough to be in porn (including my own). 15 years ago when all these women were in the early 20's? Probably 4 out of 20 were attractive enough and/or slim enough to do porn.

Has the standard dropped in recently years particularly at LegalPorno? Yes, definitely but that's a different conversation. There are many scenes that I swerve particularly if a girl is covered in tattoos and/or has balloon tits.

However, there are still plenty of attractive girls doing porn here and elsewhere. Most of these girls would be considered objectively attractive to very attractive. They're not average. Not even close.

The average woman at 25 in the UK is a size 14. Doesn't matter if she's got a really pretty face either, a career in porn isn't going to happen if she's that size.

Paizal - And just for the avoidance of any doubt, when I'm talking about porn and how attractive girls are in that space compared to real life, I'm taking about girls who work for big commercial studios like here and other studios/websites.

I'm not talking about girls who work for niche sites like Facial Abuse or Pascal Subsluts where the standard is usually terrible or just Onlyf*ns, Chaturbate etc. Any fat and/or ugly girl can eke out a living on Onlyf*ns/Chaturbate and/or appear occasionally on Facial Abuse. These are not the typical girls that appear in true commercial porn.

Jimbo8012395 wrote:Paizal - And just for the avoidance of any doubt, when I'm talking about porn and how attractive girls are in that space compared to real life, I'm taking about girls who work for big commercial studios like here and other studios/websites.

But LP/AV in particular is the worst example of attractiveness in my opinion. Maybe there are attractive girls hidden under all the clown makeup, but for me this is no comparison at all to the times of Angel Dark or Rita Faltoyano. LP/AV tends to both extremes - scrawny and emaciated / ex-stripper look with full body tattoos. I'm always surprised at the difference of Euro Girls shooting for that awful Vixen group and Euro Girls shooting for LP/AV studios. If we discuss whether LP/AV are more attractive than real life girls, I would always answer no.

Paizal wrote:

Jimbo8012395 wrote:Paizal - And just for the avoidance of any doubt, when I'm talking about porn and how attractive girls are in that space compared to real life, I'm taking about girls who work for big commercial studios like here and other studios/websites.

But LP/AV in particular is the worst example of attractiveness in my opinion. Maybe there are attractive girls hidden under all the clown makeup, but for me this is no comparison at all to the times of Angel Dark or Rita Faltoyano. LP/AV tends to both extremes - scrawny and emaciated / ex-stripper look with full body tattoos. I'm always surprised at the difference of Euro Girls shooting for that awful Vixen group and Euro Girls shooting for LP/AV studios. If we discuss whether LP/AV are more attractive than real life girls, I would always answer no.

C’mon mate. I agree that the talent has broadly declined since the glory days of European Porn in the late 90’s/early 2000’s and I do sometimes despair of the quality on here. However, there are still lots of girls at LP who are far prettier than the average girl on the street.

These are all recent/fairly recent scenes, and these girls are a lot more attractive than the average girl on the street. To say otherwise is just nonsense.

Of course, there are girls who are just as attractive and even more attractive than them in real life, but they're far from the norm. These porn girls are all in the top 10%. If I saw any of these girls on a night out back in the day with the lads, there’d be consensus amongst everyone that they were fit. No doubt of that.

Kate Love: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/317677

Lola Bredly: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/305847

Kira Viburn: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/364940

Kaira Love: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/216851

Nensi Fox: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/320827

Sofa Weber: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/261770

Barcelona: https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/200332

I won't comment on the girls by name, of course, but except for one girl on your list, I don't detect breasts, butts, or any other female curves. Is flat front, flat back so particularly attractive to you?

Don't get me wrong, these are not girls to run away from. But they're also not girls you wouldn't meet en masse in classrooms at any university. Really attractive girls come with everything. Pretty face, great boobs, a bubble butt...Angel Dark in her prime. These girls are rare. Both in porn and in real life. But a pretty face without a great body....there are plenty of them in the porn business and thousands in every big city. And visible hip bones or ribs....is not particularly attractive to me.

Paizal wrote:Agencies don't turn anyone down. They take anyone who is still willing to prostitute themselves in front of the camera in this sleazy business and do all the circus acts.

You clearly know absolutely nothing about the porn industry. Studios turn down girls all the time. Why do you think they ask for photos first? Why do you think almost all NRX girls are cute faced teens and early 20s girls with slim bodies and perky tits? As someone else said, the average girl on the street is like a size 10 to 12, unshapely boobs, plane Jane faced. Yes, there are hottest in real life, and some clustered in certain cities and locations but the AVERAGE pornstar is way hotter than the AVERAGE woman of the same age on the street. If you disagree with that statement you are simply dilusional.

There are **hotties** in real life. Autocorrect...

Pboxer88 wrote:Why do you think almost all NRX girls are cute faced teens and early 20s girls with slim bodies and perky tits?

This is your personal opinion and your personal taste.

Pboxer88 wrote: If you disagree with that statement you are simply dilusional.

WOW. Internet 101.... "if you don't agree with me, you're..."

I suppose if I told you that if he put the Goldenstate Warriors up against RandomVille Highschool, and that it's a fact the Warriors would destroy RV Highschool, you would tell me something like "oh, and I suppose anything that disagrees with your opinion is wrong, but that can't be proven because the Warriors won''t ever play RV HS". At some point, you are just being absurd.

Beauty is mostly not subjective, which is my larger point. Just because 1 in 1,000,000 men say this woman:



is more beautiful than this woman:



Doesn't mean that beauty is subjective. It means you are a rare outlier.

If you take 10 random analvids stars and put them up against 10 randomly selected girls on the street, 1 in 1,000,000 will say the street Jane's are hotter than the avids stars on average. While the number I provided can budge, the point I'm making is not an opinion.

Paizal wrote:
This is your personal opinion and your personal taste.
"

It's actually not. See above.

You pick two opposing photos and then determine which photo represents which group.....okay. This way I could go on IG and I'm convinced I'd find numerous girls in no time - not models, actors - that I, and probably numerous people, find more attractive than all the scrawny, breastless, buttless NRX girls.

There was a time when I would have agreed with you. But no longer in the 2020s. This is the time when most attractive girls earn their money at Pat*** or OF......and not in some shabby shack in Eastern Europe where they shove 3 cocks up their asses and get pissed on.

Paizal wrote:I won't comment on the girls by name, of course, but except for one girl on your list, I don't detect breasts, butts, or any other female curves. Is flat front, flat back so particularly attractive to you?

Don't get me wrong, these are not girls to run away from. But they're also not girls you wouldn't meet en masse in classrooms at any university. Really attractive girls come with everything. Pretty face, great boobs, a bubble butt...Angel Dark in her prime. These girls are rare. Both in porn and in real life. But a pretty face without a great body....there are plenty of them in the porn business and thousands in every big city. And visible hip bones or ribs....is not particularly attractive to me.

Mate, this comment is fucking delusional. "These are not girls to run away from". Lol. Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?!

You talk about people needing to get away from their computer screen and experience reality. You need an urgent dose of it.

Really attractive girls don't come with everything. 99 times out of a 100, slim girls do not have great set of tits. This is massively unrealistic expectation you've got from watching unusually attractive girls during the porn golden age of the late 90's/early 2000's. C and particularly D/DD breasts are extremely unusual on girls who weigh between 7 and 8 stone (particularly if they're on the taller side).

Angel Dark is so far away from what is considered an average girl. She's 5ft 9 (175cm), weighed barely 8 stone and yet had C/D Cup breasts.
Jane Darling was also 5ft 9, weighed less than 8.5 stone and yet had D Cups. Massive tits considering how slim she was. It's not remotely normal. She's a 1 in 1,000.

To end this, an average girl is a 5 out 10. Probably a Size 16 UK, is at least 2.5 stone overweight, doesn't look good in a thong/lingerie and isn't pretty. That's the norm.

All those girls I linked to are far more attractive than average. Yes, there are girls in real life who are just as attractive and of course even more attractive, but they're far from common. Yes, these porn girls aren't hyper attractive perfect 10's but they're in the top 10-15% of attractiveness. No doubt of that.

Porn stars are absolutely, definitely, definitively much prettier than the average girl you might bump into on the street.

This is a no-brainer question and answer....

Jimbo8012395 wrote:Mate, this comment is fucking delusional. "These are not girls to run away from". Lol. Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?!

What is delusional about the sentence? It only means that I do not consider the girls unattractive, but do not feel them as the crowning glory of creation. You can find pretty faces with skinny bodies at every school, university, beach. I assume you are from England. Don't take offense, but England is not famous for pretty girls, but it can't be that bad.

If you really belong to your 10% -15%, then you have other possibilities to profit financially from your appearance. You wouldn't have to go to East Europe to get pissed in some backyard. And as I said, the 10% -15% also includes an extraordinary body and no flat skeletons.

Paizal wrote:

Jimbo8012395 wrote:Mate, this comment is fucking delusional. "These are not girls to run away from". Lol. Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?!

What is delusional about the sentence? It only means that I do not consider the girls unattractive, but do not feel them as the crowning glory of creation. You can find pretty faces with skinny bodies at every school, university, beach. I assume you are from England. Don't take offense, but England is not famous for pretty girls, but it can't be that bad.

If you really belong to your 10% -15%, then you have other possibilities to profit financially from your appearance. You wouldn't have to go to East Europe to get pissed in some backyard. And as I said, the 10% -15% also includes an extraordinary body and no flat skeletons.

You don't seem to understand the concept of averages. The point isn't that there are beautiful girls in real life, and that some porn stars you may not find as attractive (or to not "run away from" in your words). It's that an average 5/10 on the street is less hot than the average pornstar. As an "average" this statement is not debatable, unless you're being a contrarian for the sake of it (or to get attention); which maybe you enjoy doing.

Pboxer88 wrote: (...) unless you're being a contrarian for the sake of it (or to get attention); which maybe you enjoy doing.

If I'm all about attention and arguing, I'd probably have more than 200 posts in 2 years. I am simply not convinced that porn girls are so far above the girls you see out on the streets. No longer in 2023, where porn has lost a lot of relevance and where money is earned with good looks. All this circus crap that GG and Co. shoot, you don't do as a girl because you look extraordinarily good and belong to the absolute top. They do that because they need the money.

If you tell me girls on IG or OF are above average, then I agree with you. Because those seem to be girls who get men to pay $100 for lousy nude pictures. But rolling around in a pool of piss is nothing the girls don't have to thank their magnificent beauty.