Page 1 of 1

Pretty girls = bad positioning, uglier ladies =5/5 poses...

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2018 9:38 am
by Sharpshady
Hello there,
dear LP - I'm not creating this topic just to bash you, critisize and wonder off but to help you, so please do not block it.

It's just beyond me why the h you're wasting gorgeous models like Kristy Black(!!!), or Charlote Sartre, Kate Sotile etc filming them always in the same boring positions and then you post video with max average Tyra Moon in this ultimate, "oh so fapable" grand fuking position:
https://ibb.co/gzfBoH
or average Linda:
https://ibb.co/hOZkhc

I'm getting tired of this boring DP and TAP. And good old, "on all fours" with legs together (even better if the girl is half-lieying on the sofa like in the picture above) is beeing devasted with Tyra....
Please get your stuff together

Re: Pretty girls = bad positioning, uglier ladies =5/5 poses...

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:01 am
by kidloco2
I agree. There's WAY TOO MUCH side views which makes me feel like I'm being denied to have a direct pussy or asshole view. :mad:
Makes me sick of it. :mad:

Why we don't have simple uncomplicated camera angles? :mad:

Re: Pretty girls = bad positioning, uglier ladies =5/5 poses...

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:04 pm
by Iddaoeeok
'Average' Linda. LOL.

Re: Pretty girls = bad positioning, uglier ladies =5/5 poses...

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 5:21 pm
by ultimo
More fetish.
The view you like is one I tend to fast forward through, as it does nothing for me.
Re: Kristy Black: Showing a side view of this girl shows me what I want to see which is her pretty face and sexy small boobs and a flat tummy.