PornBox.com

Im sorry to say i wouldn't fuck any of the girls in tonights 3 updates im sorry but its true where have the gorgeous girls gone crystal,nina,natalie pearl and so on,standard of girls is going,compared to what it used to be like tonights updates gio girl looks like the hulk,aluv no comment and the other scene looks skanky.

Your post puzzles me... you will never have a chance to fuck any of the Legal Porno performers so what exactly is the point here? Are you some super hot incredible looking man that will turn down women like Veronica Avluv? Somehow I think that is not the case.

If I am being honest, if I had a chance at any of the LP girls... Ria Sunn and Alice Nice. Not sure why, but they turn me on like no other girls. I would marry which ever had the best sense of humor

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:Your post puzzles me... you will never have a chance to fuck any of the Legal Porno performers so what exactly is the point here? Are you some super hot incredible looking man that will turn down women like Veronica Avluv? Somehow I think that is not the case.

Nothing to be puzzled about you think because I watch porn I don't get woman and as for avluv she's not my type at all

drevokocur66 wrote:If I am being honest, if I had a chance at any of the LP girls... Ria Sunn and Alice Nice. Not sure why, but they turn me on like no other girls. I would marry which ever had the best sense of humor

Crystal and Kira for me

So and so.

Amelie is "girl next door", Milana "dirty girl next door". But I understand OP on other side, not my cup of tea either: Gio's girl is one more unattractive model (with that look it could be a dude easily) and Veronica gone old bad way.

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:Your post puzzles me... you will never have a chance to fuck any of the Legal Porno performers so what exactly is the point here?

Why he would buy a video with a girl which he even don't want to have near in real life? That's the point.

VBT_2 wrote:Veronica gone old bad way.

The whole thread have that much sense as this statment.

Black_Fox wrote:

VBT_2 wrote:Veronica gone old bad way.

The whole thread have that much sense as this statment.

I think what the Op is trying to say is the girls shooting with LP currently aren't as pretty as the last batch of stars that came through

Anotherfine wrote:I think what the Op is trying to say is the girls shooting with LP currently aren't as pretty as the last batch of stars that came through

Yes thank you praise the lord

VBT_2 wrote:So and so.

Amelie is "girl next door", Milana "dirty girl next door". But I understand OP on other side, not my cup of tea either: Gio's girl is one more unattractive model (with that look it could be a dude easily) and Veronica gone old bad way.

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:Your post puzzles me... you will never have a chance to fuck any of the Legal Porno performers so what exactly is the point here?

Why he would buy a video with a girl which he even don't want to have near in real life? That's the point.

Thank you somebody gets my point

Ok, but whats the sense of such a post?
LP simply cant satisfy all users in just 1 days release!
Got that?

Be a bit more patient! You have to watch a longer period of time, 1 month (about 80 updates) for instance.

^ That's correct as well.

But we already commented that LP average is under Russian, Czech and Hungarian average (not everybody agreed, but implicitly...) and that difference looks some bigger in recent period.

IMHO, difference is relatively big, way too big, but HERE I speak on base of my personal taste. There is still enough of stuff on LP to make me interested, but when I search and check dates - that's older one.

dap-addict wrote:Ok, but whats the sense of such a post?
LP simply cant satisfy all users in just 1 days release!
Got that?

Be a bit more patient! You have to watch a longer period of time, 1 month (about 80 updates) for instance.

Their point seems to be that the most recent new arrivals in the studios generally haven't been to their taste, compared to some other period in the past that they remember when they thought a particular batch of girls was more attractive in their eyes.

But, same comment applies. Different girls will arrive at studios at different times. Studios can't completely control that. Fans just have to wait for some girls they like to arrive. Different fans will like different girls. There is no universal definition of "prettier" which can be applied. Different fans will disagree about what they want to see, and not everybody wants to see the "prettiest" girls.

IMO it's probably counterproductive for anonymous fans to bravely post insults about whichever models are not to their personal taste. Every model has her admirers and of course some fans will prefer other models. So what? If the studios are even listening at all to what the tiny minority of LP customers say in this forum, I would guess the studios might respond better if fans just post support and encouragement and ask for more of their favourite models. Just my opinion.

We give money - we can comment. That's how I see this job works.

And I'm all for variety, to be clear.

THERE ARE objectively stands about beauty. Surely, alongside beauty, there is acting, attitude, stand... But usually majority of talk turns around beauty issue. Well, individual opinion is important, but we can't simplify subject just on that one; in general we can split this on 3 topics or influences.

1) PERSONAL TASTE is way too wide to comment; it's even not constant.

2) TRENDS - they changes, look what is considiered as fashionable in past decades. Curves of 1950s, pin-ups of 1940s, boyish look of late 1920s, supermodels of 1980s, "size matters" short-lived trend of 1990s, cyber-look of 2000s...

3) UNIVERSAL BEAUTY (aka TIMELESS or, in reality, very close to it) as recognized by professionals. Lot of talk is needed here, also... However, I can recommend few hours of some course (photo, drawing, sculpting...) on any Accademy - it is not expensive, it is great fun, and you'll going to learn how to recognize types of beauty ("worshiped" types as "universal" also) in much shorter time than usual. And how to draw better, btw.

VBT_2 wrote:We give money - we can comment. That's how I see this job works.

And I'm all for variety, to be clear.

We're all guests at LP's free forum for as long as they allow us to stay and comment. Unless we piss them off by writing too many nasty comments about their models.

I'm for variety too

VBT_2 wrote:THERE ARE objectively stands about beauty. Surely, alongside beauty, there is acting, attitude, stand... But usually majority of talk turns around beauty issue. Well, individual opinion is important, but we can't simplify subject just on that one; in general we can split this on 3 topics or influences.

1) PERSONAL TASTE is way too wide to comment; it's even not constant.

2) TRENDS - they changes, look what is considiered as fashionable in past decades. Curves of 1950s, pin-ups of 1940s, boyish look of late 1920s, supermodels of 1980s, "size matters" short-lived trend of 1990s, cyber-look of 2000s...

3) UNIVERSAL BEAUTY (aka TIMELESS or, in reality, very close to it) as recognized by professionals. Lot of talk is needed here, also... However, I can recommend few hours of some course (photo, drawing, sculpting...) on any Accademy - it is not expensive, it is great fun, and you'll going to learn how to recognize types of beauty ("worshiped" types as "universal" also) in much shorter time than usual. And how to draw better, btw.

Props for trying to make a positive comment. We can generalise about how some girls are generally regarded as prettier/prettiest. But always somebody will argue that a different girl is prettier. And, more relevant, LP are not just selling cold beauty. LP sell sex and different people find different girls sexy. Monika is gaining positive comments in her own model thread from others who like her.

^ As I said.

Sure, if someone don't like some model, he simply will not visit her topic.

avanfurwet wrote: Unless we piss them off by writing too many nasty comments about their models.

Let's say that I simply reacted by explaining how I see OP. Or ("nasty?") coments on stands of other members.

I don't understand this whole rumor. Sometimes I must wait two or three weeks to see scene with one of my fav girls because I'm very fussy and only few girls are exactly in my type. But it's not a reason to write here statement "I wouldn't fuck any of latest dozens girls from the updates bla bla bla"... Besides like the previous speakers said, "beauty" is subjective in most cases. It always depends from personal preferences. Some likes tatooed girls, some hate tatoos, some like big boobs, some prefer small boobs etc. Yes there is something like canon of beauty but generally it's hard to connect it with real women because we are only humans and most of us are imperfect. Isn't it better to focuse on girls who we like insterad complain which models we don't like?

VBT_2 wrote:^ As I said.

Sure, if someone don't like some model, he simply will not visit her topic.

I think the forum would be a better place if that was true. Sadly, idiots are everywhere and some idiots will seek out a model's thread to say nasty things about her.

IMO it would be better for fans just to say if a model is not to their taste, and move on to ask for what they do want.

This is a fairly negative place if you look around. I find it sad that so many guys need absolute 100% flawless scenes (to their taste) or else they are miserable. I find it sad that porn becomes a chore and a negative experience to the point of being unable to "get off". Sex is fun, it should be fun.. it is imperfectly done by imperfect human beings. Enjoy the beauty in sex even if the couch is the wrong color or you don't like the girls hair or the size of her boobs . Just enjoy the best of it.

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:This is a fairly negative place if you look around. I find it sad that so many guys need absolute 100% flawless scenes (to their taste) or else they are miserable. I find it sad that porn becomes a chore and a negative experience to the point of being unable to "get off". Sex is fun, it should be fun.. it is imperfectly done by imperfect human beings. Enjoy the beauty in sex even if the couch is the wrong color or you don't like the girls hair or the size of her boobs . Just enjoy the best of it.

Good points. Although there are a lot positive posts around as well. Can't please all the people all the time.

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:This is a fairly negative place if you look around. I find it sad that so many guys need absolute 100% flawless scenes (to their taste) or else they are miserable. I find it sad that porn becomes a chore and a negative experience to the point of being unable to "get off". Sex is fun, it should be fun.. it is imperfectly done by imperfect human beings. Enjoy the beauty in sex even if the couch is the wrong color or you don't like the girls hair or the size of her boobs . Just enjoy the best of it.

Well said Cindy .

For me, as long as it has the content I like, the rest is just icing on the cake.

avanfurwet wrote:

VBT_2 wrote:^ As I said.

Sure, if someone don't like some model, he simply will not visit her topic.

I think the forum would be a better place if that was true. Sadly, idiots are everywhere and some idiots will seek out a model's thread to say nasty things about her.

IMO it would be better for fans just to say if a model is not to their taste, and move on to ask for what they do want.

Yeah I saw it . Completely lack of respect.

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:This is a fairly negative place if you look around. I find it sad that so many guys need absolute 100% flawless scenes (to their taste) or else they are miserable. I find it sad that porn becomes a chore and a negative experience to the point of being unable to "get off". Sex is fun, it should be fun.. it is imperfectly done by imperfect human beings. Enjoy the beauty in sex even if the couch is the wrong color or you don't like the girls hair or the size of her boobs . Just enjoy the best of it.

+1000

If I don't like the way a model looks I keep it to myself and the last time I checked no-one is forcing anyone to download a scene

Anotherfine wrote:

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:This is a fairly negative place if you look around. I find it sad that so many guys need absolute 100% flawless scenes (to their taste) or else they are miserable. I find it sad that porn becomes a chore and a negative experience to the point of being unable to "get off". Sex is fun, it should be fun.. it is imperfectly done by imperfect human beings. Enjoy the beauty in sex even if the couch is the wrong color or you don't like the girls hair or the size of her boobs . Just enjoy the best of it.

+1000

If I don't like the way a model looks I keep it to myself and the last time I checked no-one is forcing anyone to download a scene

Yep it's true, but some here just can't understand that...

Just 2 hours after our posts.

Well, who knows. Maybe they honestly think so and that value of honest opinion is above all, or just one case of badly chosen words, or another "do it my way or don't do it at all" attitude...

However, freedom of speach include risk of trolling; everybody got to figure out which is which.

And yes, guys, grow up and work freely on your opinion. No need to talk like bunch of lying over-sensitive fake-politically-correct pussies.

"If you don't like a scene, just ignore it" seems to be a consistent theme of this thread ..... That's also true of forum posts, guys and girls. Adding to the post in the end, really only adds to the negativity that evidently is so despised.

rikkids1234 wrote:Im sorry to say i wouldn't fuck any of the girls in tonights 3 updates im sorry but its true where have the gorgeous girls gone crystal,nina,natalie pearl and so on,standard of girls is going,compared to what it used to be like tonights updates gio girl looks like the hulk,aluv no comment and the other scene looks skanky.

Nobody here cares about who you would or would not fuck if you had enough money to pay them for it.

DoubleOrNothing wrote:

.

Let;s be honest fellas..... its guys that look like this that are the worst offenders on message forums trash talking other people's appearances. People who live and enjoy the real world and are sexually active on a regular basis and see real humans with their clothes off tend to be more accepting of the reality of human imperfections.

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:

DoubleOrNothing wrote:

.

Let;s be honest fellas..... its guys that look like this that are the worst offenders on message forums trash talking other people's appearances. People who live and enjoy the real world and are sexually active on a regular basis and see real humans with their clothes off tend to be more accepting of the reality of human imperfections.

Well said.

Things is we live in a tiny porn bubble in our own little world, So its not like there are loads and loads of women out there wanting to do porn and even among the tiny amount of women who do porn its an even smaller amount who want to shoot the type of stuff we see on LP, We should be grateful for the women that do and the last time I look that doesn't make me a pussy

avanfurwet wrote:

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:

DoubleOrNothing wrote:

.

Let;s be honest fellas..... its guys that look like this that are the worst offenders on message forums trash talking other people's appearances. People who live and enjoy the real world and are sexually active on a regular basis and see real humans with their clothes off tend to be more accepting of the reality of human imperfections.

Well said.

+1

mistress_cindy2008 wrote:

DoubleOrNothing wrote:Let;s be honest fellas..... its guys that look like this that are the worst offenders on message forums trash talking other people's appearances. People who live and enjoy the real world and are sexually active on a regular basis and see real humans with their clothes off tend to be more accepting of the reality of human imperfections.

I guess I just don't see what's wrong as long as the conversation remains civil. It's just like people saying "I'm not a fan of situation X - the OP was simply saying "I'm not a fan of actress Y." Maybe he worded it in a way that was problematic for some, but I kinda feel like his overall point wasn't all that ridiculous. Found it *kinda* similar to things I've mentioned in previous posts where I've said "I'm not a fan of (fill in the blank), because I don't feel they're great performers," or suggested a scene was poorly edited, or whatever. It's just meant to be constructive criticism for the studios, and in some cases the stars, IMO. After all, having them know what is liked and not liked is the point of the forum. Of course you might say criticism about appearance is unjustified because there's little to be done, but I don't know how true that is. Changing one's outfit, hair, or makeup can make a world of difference. Maybe we can just agree to disagree, but for the sake of the argument, I thought it worth mentioning.

Sorry for the long post.

bake0213 wrote:I agree with the sentiment of the original poster so long as the critiques don't become personal as they have in some of the model threads. Criticizing the looks of the models is no worse than any number of other sentiments expressed on these boards: members who feel the need to post on every thread, members who post the same 1 or 2 comments on every thread, members who want to be the moderator (but aren't), members who give their phone numbers out(!?). It's all fair game in my opinion.

And criticizing the overall quality models is certainly not worse than saying they don't get laid in real life. Talk about poor taste.

The original poster could have just said he wasn't a fan of the girls in that night's update and that he wanted to see more girls like those he named.
That's all he needed to say.

The OP chose personally to insult one girl saying she looked like the hulk, so he brought on himself any fallout from his gross disrespect.

The OP chose to boast that he wouldn't fuck the models, so he brought on himself any jeers or criticism about whether he got laid.

In your own words the OP made himself "fair game".

And personal criticisms about the looks of individual models are infinitely worse than the trivial examples of silly forum behaviour which you gave.
The harm caused by idiots insulting the models who work at LP has been explained better here and here.

IMO if forum members ever want to have any positive influence in persuading LP to actually listen to them and maybe give them what they want, then some of the posters here need to grow up and learn some basic respect for the people who work at LP.

Note that most of us don't hanging out with models, so there you can't talk about their personality, personal taste in art, stands in philosophy, politics, science, religion, etc. If you want to be measured by THAT standards you probably should not do porn.

In porn their bodies (beside some acting) are their MAIN TOOLS. Claiming opposite would be a lie and disrespect. Prohibit talk about this would be ridiculous.

If you are academic or priest - consumers will comment your stands.

If you are a engineer, artist or doctor - consumers will comment your solutions.

If you are handyman or football player - consumers will comment your skills, individual and in team.

If you are porn model or prostitute - consumers will comment your body.

That's how it works.