rollin_dubs187 wrote:I was just reminiscing of the good ole days of LP. Back when a new "must have" video filled with great gapes, hardcore balls deep fucking, good angles, and hot young petite teenage girls (jessica swan, sandra luberg, olivia devine, etc.) was uploaded every single day for a resonable price.
i was a big fan of olivia's work for LP but her releases were about a month apart at the closest. I remember because i was counting the days between them. maybe check her scene release dates on her model page. she (and other girls you have mentioned) didn't release as much or as often as you are fondly remembering.
rollin_dubs187 wrote:Now the site uploads nothing but nasty bitches and pure trash for 2-3 times the cost. Sure there are a few gems from time to time, but they are few and far between.
nasty bitches and pure trash? belle claire, ria sunn, emily thorne? what are you on? drug or planet? these girls are pure catwalk standard. la creme de la creme. performing intense dap and gangbangs for your pleasure. this is paradise on earth.
you are basically insulting anyone who doesn't look like a teenager (the models you mentioned are all, on average, younger than those three examples i have given).
there is nothing wrong with having that preference but don't insult adorable and adventurous women just because they don't fit your narrow concept of youthful perfection. maybe consider broadening your tastes rather than clinging to disappointment?
rollin_dubs187 wrote:I blame all you fucks for supporting lame porn. You have proven to LP that quantity wins over quality because many of you are too stupid to reconize the difference.
not sure who you are addressing as 'fucks'. i don't answer to that. I'm repsonding LP member to member. of course quantity wins over quality, LP is a business based on sales. the more units shifted the more profit, the more profit the more product they can create. and so on. they are not some obscure arts council project desgined to run at a loss in order to pursue tailoring bespoke porn to some artistic ideal you hold of young feminine perfection. LP is a business.
i would accept that due to some younger LP models (18 to early 20s) retiring and moving on, and new arrivals being on average a little older than those who left, the average age for LP has probably gone up by a couple of years during last year. maybe the girls you mentioned brought the average down from a higher average (i'm too lazy to do that maths but that is my impression). but LP doesn't create these women in a lab. nature and luck throw them LPs way and LP makes the most of its opportunities. adapt and roll with the seasons. whenever a girl of olivia's (etc) debut age appears she is snapped up by LP. gabriella for example; dap in her very first scene age 18. how many scenes did olivia do before she dap'ed? if your memory serves you well...
if 'young performers only' is your deal-breaker then go and come back when more younger girls appear. it will happen again, as it did before. but where will you go? tushy? x-art? etc. all young girls and all boring soft porn fluff.
here's a similar post i made on this subject over the weekend.
viewtopic.php?f=96&t=13319#p108698 that
if you really want change, hit [spam] and start bombarding the girls you want to see with encouragement and invitations to visit LP? link addresses of LP directors to those posts. and make posts here in the models page of girls you want to attract LP attention to. make it happen if you really care. whining gets nothing done.
and insulting LP women is seriously lame. every woman who works for LP is to be treasured. you couldn't even dream to do what they do.
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:45 pm
