PornBox.com

The rageing hitachi discussion makes me do this poll.
Just wanna get a general picture of preferences.
Clit stimul dureing b/g anal fucks of course!

Thanks for voteing!


1) No clit stimulation
dap-a cap
(Vinna Reed in GIO081)

2) studs hand
dap-a cap
(Vinna Reed in GIO081)


3) studs tongue - oh hell, where again have I seen that now?


4) girls hand
dap-a cap
(Chloe Lacourt in SZ1085)


5) dildo


6) Hitachi
dap-a cap
(Vinna Reed in GIO162)

I'm ok with girl on girl licking/touching but only during the intro or after the cumshot. As soon as the guys arrive i don't want to see any type of pussy interaction, especially no fucking. For me vibrators and dildos are just as annoying as a dp.

Sorry folks, I missed the rare option of the other girls hand on 3-5on2 pairing.
If you wan that, just tick "her own hand" please and write a post in about.
Editing the poll now I'd annullate the 8 votes cast.

My vote goes, obviously!, on studs tongue. I know it's all about porn here, that we are speaking about pro pornstars, that LP focuses on all kind of DPs, DAPs and other A2Ms, that people come here to watch things that, for different reasons, are unavailable or hard to reach in everydaylife, but IMHO there is no reason to refuse LP girls at least a tiny moment of true pleasure. I appreciate a lot watching girls enjoying a well performed cunnilingus. For my liking, it's one of the most appealing things one can see (and perform), inclunding on a porno shooting. Why not her own hands or any kind of toys ? Beacause I can't imagine a male not being eager to taste a nice pussy. So if You can have a win-win cunnilingus, appreciated by the girl as well as by the stud, there is no need to use any toys. No stimulation at all ? C'mon, don't be so self-centered. The babes deserve to enjoy their work in the same measure that we want to enjoy watching them.

Zizi, right, but please consider also visual aspects as we're talking porn here!
So not the actors own pleasure counts but also wheter most of the action is still visible.
With an actors head burried in her pussy that view is heavily obstructed. Again please everybody remember we are talking about porn not private sex here!

"studs tongue" during b/g anal!?

Since when was that ever included in a LegalPorno scene?

Sometimes you crack me up dap-addict!

Don't get me wrong, cunnilingus performed by a male actor, prior to multiple penetrations, is understandable.

But the aforementioned?


How about "other girl's tongue" during b/g anal?

dap-addict wrote:Zizi, right, but please consider also visual aspects as we're talking porn here!
So not the actors own pleasure counts but also wheter most of the action is still visible.
With an actors head burried in her pussy that view is heavily obstructed. Again please everybody remember we are talking about porn not private sex here!

Dap-addict, of course I understand Your point. I'm aware of the fact that, firstly, we are here in the porn context and, secondly, LPs users are generally into DPs, DAPs etc. Me too, sometimes, I like to watch this kind of porn, provided that it is performed by one of my favourites. Personally, I'm here more because of the fact that it's on LP that I discovered my current Number 1, Roxy Black, than beacause of harsh, raw porn aesthetics of the site (aesthetics that I appreciate, to make things clear). That said, if a DP or a DAP can be truly appealing, a nice cunnilingus can be appealing as well. I mean that watching girls' reactions (of course as natural, as real as possible) during a well performed pussy eating - their facial and body expression, the movement of their chest while breathing, the motion of their pelvis, the contrictions of their muscles, even the movement of their toes and their hands petting guys head - can be, at least for me, as rewarding/appealing/titillating as a big dick (or several) ravaging a pussy ar an anus.

All that just to justify my vote and my comment. And as I can see, there are more cunnilingus-lovers !

Looks like that, yes. I hope, however, it is clear to you all that I asked for the way of clit stimulation during anal sex, nor before or afterwards.
Cunilingus taken for its own is another thing, also in porn.
But here we are talking mainly of rcan/rcdap position and what is done to the girls clit during that assfucking.

@gapefan: I included studs tongue in the very last moment after I had spotted it in an LP scene coincidentially. I meant it rather as a joke, but it seems a lof of porn consumers want their view completely bloked during rcanal/rcdap. Or again its a misunderstanding, maybe bad phrasing of poll question.

edit: Added some voters help to my first post!

dap-addict wrote:Looks like that, yes. I hope, however, it is clear to you all that I asked for the way of clit stimulation during anal sex, nor before or afterwards.

LOL. Seems it's true that wanking disturbs the sight. I was convinced the question was generally about LPs scenes, not specifically about anal ! I apologize ! It's time to see an optitian (or reduce wanking).

That said, cunnilingus rules.

Looks like your blindness created quite some demand!
Lè forum = contry of the blind?

dap-addict wrote:Looks like your blindness created quite some demand!
Lè forum = contry of the blind?

Indeed, my bad.

That said, I think that the word "during" ("during b/g anal sex") may have been interpreted mistakenly by some users as referring to a whole scene and no exclusively to anal penetration. I mean some people may have tought that clit simulation by guys tongue option, that You included in the poll, is to be performed before or after the anal penetration but still during the b/g anal sex (unerstood as a whole scene where b/g anal is the main point but where other types of sexual behaviours can be also included). But perhaps it's just my word-splitting.

That being said, as You observed, perhaps the result of the poll reflects a certain kind of demand among LP users who are eager to see more pussy eating.

dap-addict wrote:The rageing hitachi discussion makes me do this poll.

I don't even see where there is much "raging" discussion. As this poll makes clear, the vast majority do NOT want to see these stupid Hitachis. It is only a small group, like the idiot Boshanks and a couple of others, and they have undoubtedly been brainwashed by the politically correct bullshit, that porn is evil, the girls are victims, and blah, blah, blah. I have always wondered why people like this even bother to watch porn, if they think the girls are so miserable. It really makes no sense at all.

So people are really voting for more b/g pussy licking?
Wow, i don't think i have actually seen anyone make that request on the forum before. It is more common to see requests for she-males and stuff like that to be honest.
But i guess soon we will see people posting animated gifs in the request threads with romantic sequences from x-art of guys licking pussy.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:

dap-addict wrote:The rageing hitachi discussion makes me do this poll.

I don't even see where there is much "raging" discussion. As this poll makes clear, the vast majority do NOT want to see these stupid Hitachis. It is only a small group, like the idiot Boshanks and a couple of others, and they have undoubtedly been brainwashed by the politically correct bullshit, that porn is evil, the girls are victims, and blah, blah, blah. I have always wondered why people like this even bother to watch porn, if they think the girls are so miserable. It really makes no sense at all.

I'm an idiot because I don't agree with your point of view ? I bet you're popular in your social circle

I'm not sure if you're mentally unbalanced, or if a lifetime of watching porn has warped your mind, but deriving pleasure from seeing a woman enjoy herself is not "politically correct bullshit". As I said in the other thread, a woman orgasming is a huge turn on for me, and has been since I became sexually active. I wasn't brainwashed, nor do I hold any of the views you're trying to project on to me; feel free to quote me on anything I've written on this forum that suggests "porn is evil" or that "the girls are victims and miserable". You come across as somebody who's intolerant of other peoples views and predilections, but worse than that, you act on it by attempting to have what you don't like abolished.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:Oh, and by the way, if you don't want to see it become dominant, then you must agree with me that Giorgio's latest scene is an abomination. It's as bad as anything Joey Silvera ever put out, and it's an indication of just how far LP has fallen.

An example of a pathetic attempt rally people around to your way of thinking, completely blowing something out of proportion whilst telling others they must agree with you.

I don't actually give a shit about the use of a Hitachi, I'm defending it because we all have a choice to bypass a scene if it contains something we don't like. You don't like Hitachi's, that's cool, luckily for you Vinna has done nine other scenes that you can enjoy, and the same goes for Sara, there are five other scenes for you to watch.

Boshanks wrote:As I said in the other thread, a woman orgasming is a huge turn on for me, and has been since I became sexually active.

Question is still does the anal-friendly porn LP produces need to show the girls as deriveing sexual joy classical clit based or rather anal based.
I think LP should tend to the latter - while of course a part of their talent is still classical clit based even when indulgeing convincingly into anal sex.
Chloe Delaure for instance is deriveing her lust still clearly clit based even she performs a lot of anal on set, Vinna Reed is also clit based. But the poll so far has shown that a decent part of LP fans dont see any need for clit stimulation at all. Its nothing about PC, its rather about the idea of pure anal lust.

dap-addict wrote:Question is still does the anal-friendly porn LP produces need to show the girls as deriveing sexual joy classical clit based or rather anal based.

Why does it matter, why does it need to be either-or, what is wrong with the inclusion of both and not needing to restrict anything ?

These stupid polls that continuously attempt to rule out certain things are incredibly frustrating: girls should/shouldn't keep their tops on, girls should/shouldn't keep their heels on, no touching of the pussy, no pussy fucking before the cumshot.... It's becoming ridiculous, and we'll soon be at a stage where the performers are walking on to set with a checklist of what they can and cannot do. We're already seeing some very mechanical repetition, specifically with Gonzo but the others do it as well, the same room every time, the same order and sequence of positions every time, the same 20 minute warmup intros; polls like this do nothing but contribute to a tunnel visioned focus on future output. It's one thing to offer constructive feedback on the material, but we shouldn't be trying to dictate what these guys do so stringently throughout every scene.

dap-addict wrote:But the poll so far has shown that a decent part of LP fans dont see any need for clit stimulation at all. Its nothing about PC, its rather about the idea of pure anal lust.

Most of these threads have been started by you, dap-addict, and they're almost always a direct attempt to generate support for what you think a scene should contain. There's a constant need to shape and change everything to suit your own agenda, so it doesn't surprise me that you've chosen to highlight the none at all crowd. Your conclusion from the results above is that a decent number of people don't want to see any clit stimulation, completely ignoring that three times as many voters do want to see it. A majority of 41 votes to 14, or 75%, are in favour of some form of clitoral stimulation.

Whatever the result, an argument could be made that these polls serve no purpose at all, seeing as anyone can contribute to them, including those who may never pay for or support a single scene produced here. Would you like what you're paying for potentially altered by somebody who just pirates the material, or are you okay with it as long as they're voting for the option you're in favour of ? Ultimately it's this vocal minority that can influence the way the larger membership base gets to view their porn. This site did not become as popular as it is based on the opinions of such a tiny representation of its viewers, and it can definitely be affected negatively by such opinions if they're adhered to.

In all honesty I wish these shitposts would disappear and we could just get back to what has always made Sineplex/LP great. You can't go wrong with beautiful women engaging in hard DP and anal focused sex, just throw in a little variety, within reason, to please different peoples wants and tastes.

I don't want to see any clit stimulation at all, and if a girl tries to rub her pussy or clit I want the men to move her hand away and stop her. The focus should be entirely on her ass.

Boshanks wrote:Why does it matter, why does it need to be either-or, what is wrong with the inclusion of both and not needing to restrict anything ?

These stupid polls that continuously attempt to rule out certain things are incredibly frustrating: girls should/shouldn't keep their tops on, girls should/shouldn't keep their heels on, no touching of the pussy, no pussy fucking before the cumshot.... It's becoming ridiculous, and we'll soon be at a stage where the performers are walking on to set with a checklist of what they can and cannot do. We're already seeing some very mechanical repetition, specifically with Gonzo but the others do it as well, the same room every time, the same order and sequence of positions every time, the same 20 minute warmup intros; polls like this do nothing but contribute to a tunnel visioned focus on future output. It's one thing to offer constructive feedback on the material, but we shouldn't be trying to dictate what these guys do so stringently throughout every scene.

You might be surprised, Boshanks, but you made me think and I do agree quite a lot.
I dont want any tunnel vision either.
I also ticked "her own hands" and "no clit stimulation at all" when voteing - simply because I want both, the same way as I want both DP and DAP.
I dont agree however, that polls are responsible for any tunnel vision. They show a picture, always a minority, but a minority of peer fans with an idea of what they want and of fans contributing a lot to all sorts of discussions usually - some of them even directly involved more than just watching porn. Thus polls are as contructive as other posts. Also, as far as I know, meanwhile only paying LP members can post in the forum. Or didnt that change yet?

This poll is quite crooked as the "stud using his tongue" option got misinterpreted by quite a lot of voters as the discussion shows.
For me it shows there is some acceptance for the Hitachi, but not a big demand.
It also shows that many fans do enjoy the girl to rub her clit during anal while a lot dont want any clit stimulation at all. Here its like heels on/heels off. Some want this some want that - thus a LP has care about a mix. To narrow it down I'd have to make a clear either-or poll with just one option.

Exactly like this

Thats a nice combination of hands, magizi!
Looks a bit like Ines Levin tries to prevent Mike from rubbing her clit, though.
Many girls to the same just because they know better how to please it or they just get disturbed and prefer to savour the ass fuck.

I don't think she was uncomfortable. I just picked that moment because I like seeing them hold hands and slightly overwhelmed. But I agree women normally rub their clit in a different pattern, which is so much easier to replicate as a man if you position yourself behind her.

Boshanks wrote:As I said in the other thread, a woman orgasming is a huge turn on for me, and has been since I became sexually active.

If you like watching girls get off with a vibrator, fine. There are tons of sites that have plenty of that kind of material. However, there's no need to turn LP into another one of those sites. Or are you one of those people who thinks every single site must cater to every single one of your fetishes?

I don't actually give a shit about the use of a Hitachi, I'm defending it because we all have a choice to bypass a scene if it contains something we don't like.

This perfectly illustrates the point I was making on the other thread. You admit that the Hitachi doesn't do anything for you, and yet, for some reason, you insist on defending the use of it, even though you know that for many of us, it ruins the scene. Why is that? To me, the reason is pretty obvious, even if you won't admit it. You have been brainwashed into believing that porn is a form of abuse, that the girls are victims, and blah blah blah. So, you relieve your guilt by sticking up for things that you think they enjoy. Either that, or you are simply a contrarian asshole. Either way, I don't see why your opinion on this topic should be given much weight, given that you have admitted that you "don't actually give a shit" whether they use the vibrators or not.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:If you like watching girls get off with a vibrator, fine. There are tons of sites that have plenty of that kind of material. However, there's no need to turn LP into another one of those sites. Or are you one of those people who thinks every single site must cater to every single one of your fetishes?

This in no way represents me, it's a reflection of yourself from a slightly different perspective. How does it read if you start it with "If you don't like".

I have no interest in dictating what LP or any other site should showcase, this is a feeble attempt to project your mentality on to me. As I said previously, you're incapable of accepting the views of others and are completely intolerant of anything other than your own interpretation. The only person who's trying to demand what this site caters to is you.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:This perfectly illustrates the point I was making on the other thread. You admit that the Hitachi doesn't do anything for you, and yet, for some reason, you insist on defending the use of it, even though you know that for many of us, it ruins the scene. Why is that? To me, the reason is pretty obvious, even if you won't admit it. You have been brainwashed into believing that porn is a form of abuse, that the girls are victims, and blah blah blah. So, you relieve your guilt by sticking up for things that you think they enjoy. Either that, or you are simply a contrarian asshole. Either way, I don't see why your opinion on this topic should be given much weight, given that you have admitted that you "don't actually give a shit" whether they use the vibrators or not.

Again with your narrow-minded bullshit As comprehension is beyond you, let me try and restate: I'm defending it as I disagree with your attempt to have something excluded simply because of a personal hate for it. I know this is extremely difficult for you to understand, but there are people who might enjoy the inclusion of things that you don't; none of us should be making demands that directly affects the content for others. Out of interest, how would you feel if I tried to get ATM prohibited ?

LP's setup allows us to freely spend tickets on whatever we choose, If an update contains something we don't like, we can simply skip it, you're under no obligation to purchase anything that doesn't appeal to you. There's no issue whatsoever with expressing aversion for something, but when an adult starts stamping his feet like a petulant child and insisting on its removal, I'm sorry to tell you, but there's only one asshole in that scenario.

I also find it funny that you would refer to me as contrarian; how much support did you generate for that pile of egotistical shit you addressed to Giorgio? Considering of course that it's been viewed over 430 times and supposedly represents popular opinion.

Tastes Like Ass wrote:To me, the reason is pretty obvious, even if you won't admit it. You have been brainwashed into believing that porn is a form of abuse, that the girls are victims, and blah blah blah. So, you relieve your guilt by sticking up for things that you think they enjoy.

I thought the same first, but not in Boshanks case, I am sure.
Its a common issue with quite a lot of posters here, though. Most use similar reasonings at a point. Some even turn to crypto or open anti-porners.
Its a remaining quetion still how much joy we want a girl to get at work. One thing is for sure: The mre she enjoys her job the better she performs usually.

magizi87 wrote:But I agree women normally rub their clit in a different pattern

At whichever POV we stand in the no clit stimulation at all vs. clit stimulation poll I think we have to agree that for many porn girls its just a good way to enjoy their on set job better and thus finally give the viewer a better performance overall. Also some girls are just more clit based and some less.

Just noticed an interesting detail in Susana Melo's most recent dap performance for LP. Susana is not overly clit based, but at the end of her rcdap workout just when it seems to get a bit too much for her instead of pushing Vinny back she starts to rub her clit. It just gives her that special something, even her thick gloves prevent a good touch. Its clealy in her mind rather, but immagine she wasnt allowed to get her hand at her pussy? Cruel limitation!

dap-a cap
Vinny dapping a bit too long and too deep, Susana considers pushing him back.

dap-a cap
Better use of that hand.

dap-a cap
Feels good!

I think clit masturbation can either show you more of the lady's pussy, or hide it from you. And it's the showing of the lady's pussy that looks good in porn.

A lot of clit masturbation in porn is done poorly. Because it hides the lady's pussy from you. But I found some excellent examples where clit masturbation spreads and reveals the lady's pussy for you. And I think this kind of clit masturbation looks pretty good to virtually every guy. Because guys usually want to see more of the lady rather than less.

I get your point of view, dan, but when we start talking about really demanding acts like DAP even as just porn watchers we should also take the girls point of view into account. Of course these girls get payed and just perform for money what they are asked for but the more they enjoy what they do, the better the outcome - as with any kind of work.
At the same time the stimulation technic choosen should minimize view obstruction, thus the Hitachi sure isnt the best choice.

But I've watched a lot of DAP break-ins where clit stimulation actually helped the girl a lot to just do it!
Depends a lot of the girl and her way to get excited, though. A long and complicated story of her intimate sexuality of course, more than her porn career.

Re-watching some of the early Ria Sunn DAPs recently one interesting detail is how she really protests against clit stimulation when getting prepared for the 3rd DAP breakin for LP. Really fascinating and sweet at the same time. A true Anal Queen in the Makeing!

dap-a cap
Mike rubs Rias clit camera- and viewer-friendly without obstructing the nice pusy view. Ria doenst look amused at all!

dap-a cap
Annoyed she takes her hand.

dap-a cap
And pushes him away from her clit.

Half a minute later the rcdap breakin' for gonzo studio starts.

yes

dap-addict wrote:I get your point of view, dan, but when we start talking about really demanding acts like DAP even as just porn watchers we should also take the girls point of view into account. ...

Mike rubs Rias clit camera- and viewer-friendly without obstructing the nice pussy view. Ria doesn't look amused at all!

...
Annoyed she takes her hand.

...
And pushes him away from her clit....

Yes, looking at it from the lady's point of view is very important, when it comes to pleasing the lady in any way. Because the guy can easily hurt her and make it very uncomfortable for her by using too much force and pressure on her.

If you look closely at the pictures above, then it does look like the guy is using too much force and pressure on her un-lubricated clit. That's why she doesn't like it.

No lube on her pussy and clit is a part of the problem here. It's like having a lady give you hand-job with dry hands on a dry cock, without any lube at all. This kind of a hand-job is bound to be painful, rather than pleasant for you.

This guy is so bad at it that he makes it painful and unpleasant for her, rather than please her. It's easy for a guy to screw up any sex-act, including touching the lady's breasts and masturbating her clit. All the guy needs to do is forget about the lady's point of view and do it on her as if she is a plastic doll, without any feeling at all. Lack of empathy is what does it.

I've had a lady once get rough with my cock, rough enough to make me feel some pain. And although I didn't like this experience, I realized that this lady was showing me how I made her feel once in a while, when I had sex with her.

I've learned from this experience to look at it from her point of view and try to do it in a way that's pleasant for her. Perhaps that's the kind of experience some guys at Legal Porno need to have too, before they can become good at pleasing their ladies.

It's hard to understand the other's point of view, until you've had a similar experience, similar enough to imagine what it feels like for the other person.

danthefan73 wrote:I've learned from this experience to look at it from her point of view and try to do it in a way that's pleasant for her. Perhaps that's the kind of experience some guys at Legal Porno need to have too, before they can become good at pleasing their ladies.

Sounds like you are streamlineing your own intimate experience on that LP porn set. Mike Angelo on contrary is actually quite good at pleasing the girls, but for sure Ria knows just better how to please her clit. I mean its not romance we talk about here, but porn production still. Also dry or lubed is not only a technical question - easy to be solved on this terms actually, but I guess you know that.

dap-addict wrote:

danthefan73 wrote:I've learned from this experience to look at it from her point of view and try to do it in a way that's pleasant for her. Perhaps that's the kind of experience some guys at Legal Porno need to have too, before they can become good at pleasing their ladies.

Sounds like you are streamlineing your own intimate experience on that LP porn set. Mike Angelo on contrary is actually quite good at pleasing the girls, but for sure Ria knows just better how to please her clit. I mean its not romance we talk about here, but porn production still. Also dry or lubed is not only a technical question - easy to be solved on this terms actually, but I guess you know that.

I get what he meant and it's all true of course. I fully agree with every single word, however we must remember that this is still porn production not the act of love, date or something. I bet Mike doesn't do that in his private live. Those all scenes have nothing to do with reality.

Kriss1986 wrote:

dap-addict wrote:

danthefan73 wrote:I've learned from this experience to look at it from her point of view and try to do it in a way that's pleasant for her. Perhaps that's the kind of experience some guys at Legal Porno need to have too, before they can become good at pleasing their ladies.

Sounds like you are streamlineing your own intimate experience on that LP porn set. Mike Angelo on contrary is actually quite good at pleasing the girls, but for sure Ria knows just better how to please her clit. I mean its not romance we talk about here, but porn production still. Also dry or lubed is not only a technical question - easy to be solved on this terms actually, but I guess you know that.

I get what he meant and it's all true of course. I fully agree with every single word, however we must remember that this is still porn production not the act of love, date or something. I bet Mike doesn't do that in his private live. Those all scenes have nothing to do with reality.

Porn isn't love or a date. But it is lust, hard-and-fast. Or it least it should be in a good anal and DP. And lust for the lady is having her clit stimulated, while she is being penetrated.

Nobody says that it's love or a date, when a hot lady sucks a guy's cock in a porn-scene. So, why would anybody say that stimulating the lady's clit is love or a date?

Good porn is all about lust. And you can certainly have lust on a porn-set, especially between strangers. Because guys usually want the hot lady more, when they haven't been with her before.

I think it's time to do away with double-standards in porn and put the lady's clitoral pleasure on the same level as the guy's cock-pleasure. Because they are both lust.

I will not argue with you but it sounds like LP should go into vanilla...

Kriss1986 wrote:I will not argue with you but it sounds like LP should go into vanilla...

I'd say that vanilla sex is when it's inhibited in some way.

Overcoming anal inhibition with the lady is only a part of it. The other part is being all hands with the lady.

When it looks like the guy is either inhibited or prohibited from touching the lady's pussy and tits, then this isn't true lust anymore. Because he isn't going all out on her.

I realize that a guy being all hands with the lady is how a bad date is often described. Because this guy is breaking social inhibitions and prohibitions to get what he wants. But what I don't understand is why do we need such social inhibitions and prohibitions in a porn scene?

This doesn't make sense to me at all. When the guy is already inside the ass of his girl, then why not grope her tits and play her pussy at the same time too?

It's like they feel guilty about breaking their anal inhibition. So, they compensate for it by religiously observing their other inhibitions against touching and groping the lady. This is just substitution one inhibition for another, rather than having totally uninhibited sex.

danthefan73 wrote:It's like they feel guilty about breaking their anal inhibition. So, they compensate for it by religiously observing their other inhibitions against touching and groping the lady. This is just substitution one inhibition for another, rather than having totally uninhibited sex.

What guilt are you talking about?
These actors do a job! The girl got booked for anal and they perform it. Thats all.
Of course lust may play a role when they work on set, of course its better when they lust for each other, but its porn entertainment work still and for this reason it has to look good on screen. And a studs hand in her pussy doenst look as nice as the girls hands, especially if they are well groomed, with sexy long tipps etc. And a hitchi for instance obstructs all the view.

This said, some girls perform better anal/dap when they get their pussy rubbed at the same time, they relax easier and the anal sex show result is better. Depends on the girl, but its still better she provides the clit stimulation herself.

I'd say anything but Hitachi.

Hitachi is wonderful in real life and even in a solo or g/g/ scene if the girl is really getting off on it, but in b/g porn it's just an ugly machine in the way.

dap-addict wrote:

danthefan73 wrote:It's like they feel guilty about breaking their anal inhibition. So, they compensate for it by religiously observing their other inhibitions against touching and groping the lady. This is just substitution one inhibition for another, rather than having totally uninhibited sex.

What guilt are you talking about?
These actors do a job! The girl got booked for anal and they perform it. Thats all. ...

Doing a job, rather than expressing your feeling during the drilling, is certainly one way to deal with doing embarrassing things in public.

People don't normally have sex in public. This is a very unusual thing to do. And perhaps this is makes their behavior un-natural in this kind of a situation.

Guys normally want to grope the chick whom they are nailing with their dick. But when they do it in pubic, then perhaps groping is too embarrassing for them. Because this isn't just doing a job anymore. It's like the guy really wants her.

danthefan73 wrote:

dap-addict wrote:

danthefan73 wrote:It's like they feel guilty about breaking their anal inhibition. So, they compensate for it by religiously observing their other inhibitions against touching and groping the lady. This is just substitution one inhibition for another, rather than having totally uninhibited sex.

What guilt are you talking about?
These actors do a job! The girl got booked for anal and they perform it. Thats all. ...

Doing a job, rather than expressing your feeling during the drilling, is certainly one way to deal with doing embarrassing things in public.

People don't normally have sex in public. This is a very unusual thing to do. And perhaps this is makes their behavior un-natural in this kind of a situation.

Guys normally want to grope the chick whom they are nailing with their dick. But when they do it in pubic, then perhaps groping is too embarrassing for them. Because this isn't just doing a job anymore. It's like the guy really wants her.

But generally folks and girls mainly doing their job I think. The pleasure and expressing feelings are some additional elements. I agree normally we don't want to share our act with viewers and it's normal thing, but in porn situation is completely different. Behaviour during the scene has nothing to do with a reality, it's completely different level of feelings. Anyway it's alwas better to see when girl is really enjoyed the act.

.

^
I'd say that good porn isn't just about being real and sincere. It's also about doing the kind of things that the viewer might want to do, if he or she were in this kind of a situation.

Which means that if the lady has such a nice tit that the viewer might want to grab it, then that's what the male actor should do too.

It's all about fulfilling the viewer's fantasy.