Page 1 of 1

"Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:20 am
by aeolian43
A cardinal feature of psychopathy is "use of cruelty to gain empowerment, exploitative tendencies and destructive excitement seeking".

Do people who enjoy pure anal get off on the fact that anal is possibly a painful experience for the girl, or is in some way the incorrect or destructive way of doing things? Is it that they may also derive pleasure from the fact that anal is not pleasurable for most girls? (This is especially true for people who enjoy "100% anal" scenes. For them this may translate as "0% pleasure for the girl" and this might be what excites them.)

A second theory could be that they are closet homosexuals who whilst unable to break from the chains and accept reality choose to inflict this upon a girl, "passing" their fear on to them.

I personally enjoy DP's but 100% anal scenes? I'll stay away from them, thank you.

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:25 am
by aeolian43
lostmaninalostworld wrote:Thanks for sharing this useless information with all of us.


It may be useless to someone with the aggregate IQ level of three working neurons; to others it may be quite useful.

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:28 am
by analsexonly
Your entire concept is based on faulty premises: that anal is not enjoyable for women. You are dead wrong. I have and do know many women who get more pleasure from anal than vaginal, and almost anyone can have a more powerful orgasm with the additional of anal stimulation. Personally, I both prefer the physical sensations of anal for myself, and I love the fact that women orgasm harder and more easily from their ass. It's more intimate, it's more raw and primal, it's more physically satisfying for everyone if done correctly, and it's natural birth control. It's just better all around. Not everyone agrees, and that's totally fine, but that's my approach to anal only/0% pussy. Next time, you might phrase your post more reasonably rather than being a fuckwit and insulting people who like something you don't. I don't enjoy DP or vaginal, but you don't see me insulting people who do.

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:31 am
by Iddaoeeok
aeolian43 wrote:My theory is that everyone who doesn't enjoy watching vaginal sex, is in essence, a psychopath.


How to make friends and influence people.

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:35 am
by aeolian43
analsexonly wrote:Your entire concept is based on faulty premises: that anal is not enjoyable for women. You are dead wrong. I have and do know many women who get more pleasure from anal than vaginal, and almost anyone can have a more powerful orgasm with the additional of anal stimulation. Personally, I both prefer the physical sensations of anal for myself, and I love the fact that women orgasm harder and more easily from their ass. It's more intimate, it's more raw and primal, it's more physically satisfying for everyone if done correctly, and it's natural birth control. It's just better all around. Not everyone agrees, and that's totally fine, but that's my approach to anal only/0% pussy. Next time, you might phrase your post more reasonably rather than being a fuckwit and insulting people who like something you don't. I don't enjoy DP or vaginal, but you don't see me insulting people who do.


I would, except your argument makes no sense.

I. Intimacy: You're claiming anal sex is somehow more intimate than vaginal sex. On terms of intimacy, vaginal sex implies you are ready or willing to procrate with the woman you are fucking. Whilst anal sex may subtly imply the woman is comfortable with your presence (or you've paid her a substantial amount of money), you'd find it hard to sell anal sex as being more intimate.

II. Pleasure: If you are a man, this is an entirely different story. You have a prostate, and stimulation of the prostate is what causes your pleasurable sensations. Women do not have prostates, and any erogenous zone would be the anal sphincter. For every 1 woman who enjoys anal, you'll find 10,000 who hate or do not enjoy it. This is why actresses are paid more money to do these scenes. They are difficult, painful and not pleasurable.

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:38 am
by Iddaoeeok
aeolian43 wrote:
analsexonly wrote:On terms of intimacy, vaginal sex implies you are ready or willing to procrate with the woman you are fucking.


This is a bizarre statement to make in the year 2016. Are you the Pope?

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:43 am
by aeolian43
Iddaoeeok wrote:
aeolian43 wrote:
analsexonly wrote:On terms of intimacy, vaginal sex implies you are ready or willing to procrate with the woman you are fucking.


This is a bizarre statement to make in the year 2016. Are you the Pope?


That is a bizarre statement to make in any day in age. Are you suggesting technological and societal advancement should make us all have anal sex or make anal sex more acceptable?

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:48 am
by Iddaoeeok
No, the statement that 'vaginal sex implies that you are willing to procreate' strikes me as bizarre. By the way, I actually agree with you that 'anal only' is a bit weird, but not with your attempt to explain it - the phrase using a sledgehammer to crack a nut comes to mind.

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:49 am
by analsexonly
The reason there's a misconception that anal is not pleasurable is because of all the people who think "oh, it's just another hole I can stick my dick in" and do so with no preparation, which does result in a lot of pain and a lot of women who swear off ever trying anal again. But if you do it right? There's a reason most actual anal only women out there do it because it's what they want, rather than because a guy pressured them into doing it. I'm not debating this with you: I'm telling you that you're wrong and I'm right, and I absolutely know that I am right, through extensive personal experience and conversation with women who absolutely love anal as much or more than vaginal.

Can anal hurt? Yes, if done incorrectly. Are there a lot of women who dislike or refuse to try anal? Yes, for a variety of reasons, usually because they had some bad experiences and swore off trying it again to learn how to do it correctly, or just because they think it's gross. But almost any women can love anal if it's done correctly. Some can orgasm directly from anal with no other stimulation, and almost all can have a more powerful orgasm than from vaginal through anal intercourse + clitoral stimulation. Women do not have a prostate, but they do have a clitoris, and the clitoris is more than just the external component—it has a lot of internal components which can be stimulated from both vaginal and anal penetration.

As for it being more intimate, that is something I, partners I have been with, and men and women I have spoken to who are or have been in heterosexual anal only relationships have all echoed—a mutual feeling of greater intimacy from anal sex. A certain aspect of this undoubtedly comes from trusting a partner to take care and not hurt them in a potentially (but not necessarily) painful/sensitive location, and trusting them with what is really just a very intimate place because it's so often associated with being something dirty. The idea of sharing yourself with your partner that way is very intimate.

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:55 am
by aeolian43
Iddaoeeok wrote:No, the statement that 'vaginal sex implies that you are willing to procreate' strikes me as bizarre. By the way, I actually agree with you that 'anal only' is a bit weird, but not with your attempt to explain it - the phrase using a sledgehammer to crack a nut comes to mind.


I'm trying to break it down to the simplest levels of psychology as underneath all these different layers of thought, this is the primal driver when it comes to sex. I might have misinterpreted you above, sorry.

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 2:10 am
by JohnMcSpunkencock
To answer original question, I 100% do NOT get off on it if the babe clearly isn't enjoying it. I am a self confessed anal lover but never to the extent of the babe clearly not enjoying it. No exceptions

Re: "Anal only" - Psychopathy or repressed homosexuality?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 4:47 am
by cyberhog59
aeolian43 wrote:A cardinal feature of psychopathy is "use of cruelty to gain empowerment, exploitative tendencies and destructive excitement seeking".

Do people who enjoy pure anal get off on the fact that anal is possibly a painful experience for the girl, or is in some way the incorrect or destructive way of doing things? Is it that they may also derive pleasure from the fact that anal is not pleasurable for most girls? (This is especially true for people who enjoy "100% anal" scenes. For them this may translate as "0% pleasure for the girl" and this might be what excites them.)

A second theory could be that they are closet homosexuals who whilst unable to break from the chains and accept reality choose to inflict this upon a girl, "passing" their fear on to them.

I personally enjoy DP's but 100% anal scenes? I'll stay away from them, thank you.


Seriously, are you a recent Psych 101 participant at your local college ?

Frankly, I don't give a shit what the result of your expert ANALysis is. The fact is, I enjoy watching this type of sex and make no apologies for it.

If that make me a psychopatch or a homosexual in your eyes, so be it. I could give two shits. You and your ill-researched opinions are flyshit to me.

Stop analysing what gets us off and just enjoy well made porn.

If this is too much for you, may I suggest you fuck off.