PornBox.com

Think about it. Comments like: "I would like that girl to get the.....(fill in hes name) treatment.
Or: " would like that girl to be fucked in the ass by multiple big beautiful dicks from studs...
Maybe the fact that the most pop scenes is the one with most guys points to this as well....? A bit,,,,much

Now, i`m not saying it is anything wrong being bi or whatever. The thing that kind of irritates me is that this is a site where the producers claims it to be for straight people. The girls being the main focus points to it. But underneath it seems to be a tendensy towards bisexuality more then anything else.
This do not arouse me cuz i`m staright! This is the reasons why i write about being annyed with the girl being overshadowed by 100 limbs up her whatever hole.

MY MAIN POINT AND SUGGESTION:
Instead of having a style of living halfway into the closet, please make it clear and maybe, just maybe you people who construct this site could sort out the bi- scenes and the scenes who focus on the girl?

Show me your cock and I'll tell you

Seriously, I know exactly where you're coming from as I am a fan really of only anal, no more. It would be heaven, I'd imagine, for a bisexual but that's not to say it's not very hetrosexual. I agree on the basic premise

Haha
I mean, i love watching the woman gape with her asshole. It`s just beautiful. But two cocks rubbing next to each other or just analsex filmed in a way where you see the guy(s) even more than the girl interrupts with the arousal (if you are straight). It`s a bicurious mess.

Other than female solo and g/g lesbian porn, there are males in every single porn scene ever made.

The LegalPorno camera always centers on the girl(s).

The rest is up to the viewer, as to what they choose to focus their attention on.


As far as multiple penetrations go, in my opinion either you are comfortable with the idea of sharing a woman in bed, or you are not.

I myself enjoy the concept of an insatiable woman who just can't seem to get enough. That's why I'm here.


If what you are looking for is female solo, girl-on-girl lesbian, or boy-girl one-on-one.. what are you doing here in the first place?

It should be obvious to anyone at a first glance that is not what LegalPorno specializes in.

Besides, there's plenty of that available elsewhere on the net, in bulk, at much cheaper rates.

]"If what you are looking for is female solo, girl-on-girl lesbian, or boy-girl one-on-one.. what are you doing here in the first place?"

Because i like the nastyfactor and the gaping. It has more to do with HOW the scenes are made! Don`t you see that point?
If you have more than two guys the it needs to be directed carefully since guys are not transparent. They shoud go inside her one at the time more (not necessarily all the time). DAP is cool, but i find it questionable when it becomes the norm. Is that really such a unreasonable thing to say?
As i said a dusin of times:
I want to see the woman!! Not 100 limbs on top of each other cuz i`m not bi or gay. See my point?

I understand your point. But I can't think of a single scene here, where the camera isn't centered on the woman.

If you don't like looking at the men, then don't.

As far as double anal goes, for me, it's never been about what the guys are doing.

As I said before, I enjoy the concept of an insatiable woman who just can't seem to get enough.

I can't think of a single scene here, where the camera isn't centered on the woman.

Well, for me this has to do with estetics. Two guys entering her at the same time reduces this estetics when it comes to the focus of the woman. Doing good gape- angles and positions is easier with one guy at the time. Take Crystals debut as an example. The part where se lies with her neck at the floor and her ass up being assfucked one at the time. That is superhot to mee cuz you see the woman. Now, what would happen if a secound guy came in? What you would see then is a guy who gets in the way.
But DP and DAP can be a hot adding as i said. But i would like to see more of one guy at the time for the estetic reasons.
All the other more "extreme" things defines Legalporn and that is fine, but this things should be directed in a estetic way and too much of it may reduce the estetics. It is a balance i guess.

fremmed479 wrote:

I can't think of a single scene here, where the camera isn't centered on the woman.

Well, for me this has to do with estetics. Two guys entering her at the same time reduces this estetics when it comes to the focus of the woman. Doing good gape- angles and positions is easier with one guy at the time. Take Crystals debut as an example. The part where se lies with her neck at the floor and her ass up being assfucked one at the time. That is superhot to mee cuz you see the woman. Now, what would happen if a secound guy came in? What you would see then is a guy who gets in the way.
But DP and DAP can be a hot adding as i said. But i would like to see more of one guy at the time for the estetic reasons.
All the other more "extreme" things defines Legalporn and that is fine, but this things should be directed in a estetic way and too much of it may reduce the estetics. It is a balance i guess.

There is PLENTY what you seek elsewhere. Here is where we cater to OUR fetishes and turn ons. If that works for you fine, but if it doesn't do not try to change this . Most of us enjoy this stuff. If you don't like it, there is plenty outside that cater to you. Don't make this place of DAP heaven change to make you happy. Take your aesthetics and dangle.

No need to be rude little boy.

I am a classic bisexual in so much that I find both males and females sexually attractive although I am more picky when it comes to men. When it comes to porn however I would say that 90% of my focus is on the women as aesthetically wise they excite me far more. I tend to just see dicks and rarely inspect the guys body or face. There are exceptions to this of course but in the main I am here for the girls.

I would also think that the vast majority of straight guys on here are also getting off to the girls, irrespective of the number of male body parts on show and that multiple cocks just makes the inevitable sex more extreme and perverted which in turn is likely to create more arousal.

Not sure where this is going really? The classic counter (straw man) argument is of course that all boy girl porn is bisexual as even in its most stripped back version, you are still going to see a man and a cock entering a woman. How does the multiplication of cocks make it any more 'gay'? I don't agree with that argument btw, just using it to make a point.

My perception may be entirely wrong and perhaps lots of men get off to both. Not a problem either way, we all use porn for different reasons xx

laura. wrote:I am a classic bisexual in so much that I find both males and females sexually attractive although I am more picky when it comes to men. When it comes to porn however I would say that 90% of my focus is on the women as aesthetically wise they excite me far more. I tend to just see dicks and rarely inspect the guys body or face. There are exceptions to this of course but in the main I am here for the girls.

I would also think that the vast majority of straight guys on here are also getting off to the girls, irrespective of the number of male body parts on show and that multiple cocks just makes the inevitable sex more extreme and perverted which in turn is likely to create more arousal.

Not sure where this is going really? The classic counter (straw man) argument is of course that all boy girl porn is bisexual as even in its most stripped back version, you are still going to see a man and a cock entering a woman. How does the multiplication of cocks make it any more 'gay'? I don't agree with that argument btw, just using it to make a point.

My perception may be entirely wrong and perhaps lots of men get off to both. Not a problem either way, we all use porn for different reasons xx

You make it sound so romantic!

Here is one spesific example that may point to what i am trying to say:
Look at the picture at the right and then at the pic to the left.
Why would a straight man find the pic to the right more arousing visually speaking if it where not for some form of a bi- factor?
I mean, lets get real. What we see is a lot of limbs from a guy and the side of a womans face with a naked man in front of her, one on top of her and one under her. and one behind her. This is almost 80% man- skin. The other pic is a beautiful woman being entered by one guy at a time with moments in between where we have the chance to see her gape. This in my opinion should be the norm and the we can add dp, dpp, pdp, tap, top tip or what the fuc all this names are....:P That is all fun, but are we talking about sex here and the visual beauty of it or are we talking about sircus?
As i said befre. I like it nasty, but when you have more than three guys, we should be aware about the aestetics too.

So if you disagree about this then why?

Just so long as Mike, Ian or any of the boys doesn't hit the wrong target I'll be fine

fremmed479 wrote:This in my opinion should be the norm...

And who are you again?

I think it should be the usual thing and then the dp, dap etc can be added to it, not the other way around. And the reason for this opinion is because i want to see the woman cuz i`m straight. "Who i am"? Myself, last time a checked.... And you?

fremmed479 wrote:Here is one spesific example that may point to what i am trying to say:
Look at the picture at the right and then at the pic to the left.
Why would a straight man find the pic to the right more arousing visually speaking if it where not for some form of a bi- factor?
I mean, lets get real. What we see is a lot of limbs from a guy and the side of a womans face with a naked man in front of her, one on top of her and one under her. and one behind her. This is almost 80% man- skin. The other pic is a beautiful woman being entered by one guy at a time with moments in between where we have the chance to see her gape. This in my opinion should be the norm and the we can add dp, dpp, pdp, tap, top tip or what the fuc all this names are....:P That is all fun, but are we talking about sex here and the visual beauty of it or are we talking about sircus?
As i said befre. I like it nasty, but when you have more than three guys, we should be aware about the aestetics too.

So if you disagree about this then why?

Why are you asking these questions of others? Is it because you questioning your OWN sexuality?

Personally I find BOTH arousing. Does this make ME bi or homosexual in your eyes? You want to know how much I care about what is in your eyes? If it made you blind, not a bit.

What makes me angry and what prompts me to post a reply, are people like you who try to shame people for their sexual preferences while YOU are the one questioning your own. Work out your own problems first and then come here with your Oscar Wilde bullshit aesthetics to cover up for the fact that your sexual preferences are shaky at best, if that.

This is a site for people who are comfortable in their own skin. People like you need to get a clue.

Honestly I consider myself 100% hetero, BUT if someone thinks that likeing these videos might make me bi or gay, I really couldn't care less (or even think about it). If I contrary to all logic woke up gay tomorrow, I could probably cope with it. It's 2016 and you shouldn't have to rationalixe why you appreciate what you like. It's beyond retarded that we are even having this discussion!

I never said there is something wrong about bisexuality.
I only question why a straight man would find it arousing watching a mans ass. And i also question it cuz i prefere the pic to the right and i want to see more of what i like and i make this point by asking the questions.
I think asking questions is more constructive than just say "This is how it needs to be". Ok? Ok...