fredflehoux wrote:Boob naturalist puritain are a vocal minority like vegans.
Girl who aren't getting boob jobs in the porn industry are probably just less dedicated to their career then the rest who invest in it. Might just be a case of natural selection
Ultra-Gape wrote:fredflehoux wrote:Boob naturalist puritain are a vocal minority like vegans.
Girl who aren't getting boob jobs in the porn industry are probably just less dedicated to their career then the rest who invest in it. Might just be a case of natural selection
The second point is offensively wrong.
Any particular evidence for your first point?
Ursus69 wrote:I was so sad to see Emily Pink get a boob job. She was quickly becoming one of my favorites.... but not anymore. This is 2022 not 1992. Women should never get plastic surgery unless it's to fix an injury.
poldijk wrote:Ultra-Gape wrote:fredflehoux wrote:Boob naturalist puritain are a vocal minority like vegans.
Girl who aren't getting boob jobs in the porn industry are probably just less dedicated to their career then the rest who invest in it. Might just be a case of natural selection
The second point is offensively wrong.
Any particular evidence for your first point?
second point:
Fredflehoux, are you talking about all the girls or only the ones with small tits?
because I can't find any smart reason for Belle Claire or Stacy Bloom to enhance their beautiful chest...even Khali, who has beautiful A+ tits, should never put silicon inside.
I'm aware she would please all big silicon tits lovers, but she will get ride of all her fans who love her actual body
first point:
Ultra-gape, come on, there is a particular evidence vegan is a vocal minority with natural tits
fredflehoux wrote:Natural selection, if it was so unpopular and wouldnèt increase their popularity they wouldn't do it as much, meanwhile natty tit only is a niche.
Be offended we got used to fake outrage in today's world
TheVulture wrote: I certainly don't see it as "empowering" as some people say. I think it's the opposite of that. Dumbing down or whatever. Giving in to a sort of perceived modern consumer ideal that doesn't really exist.
stewpidaz wrote:TheVulture wrote: I certainly don't see it as "empowering" as some people say. I think it's the opposite of that. Dumbing down or whatever. Giving in to a sort of perceived modern consumer ideal that doesn't really exist.
I'm with you in the preference for natural, but I disagree about this part. You say the consumer ideal doesn't exist, but it DOES exist. The whole reason that plastic surgery is effective and gives women a self-esteem boost is because they get more attention. With boobs for example, even though I prefer natural, I am a minority. Most people here love the fake boobs, doesn't really matter as long as they are massive. The whole reason people found Lucie Wilde so attractive was her comically large and fake tits. I can see why getting plastic surgery done makes women feel empowered, and there have been studies that it has long lasting effects in boost to self-esteem. But it is a shame because I think it makes them look awful in a lot of cases.
TheVulture wrote:fredflehoux wrote:Natural selection, if it was so unpopular and wouldnèt increase their popularity they wouldn't do it as much, meanwhile natty tit only is a niche.
Be offended we got used to fake outrage in today's world
Wait....natural selection is now defined as....being unnatural?
Have you thought this through?
Also, Charles Darwin wants his notes back.
fredflehoux wrote:Natural selection, if it was so unpopular and wouldnèt increase their popularity they wouldn't do it as much, meanwhile natty tit only is a niche.
fredflehoux wrote:Ohh don't get me wrong, if the titties are big and nice naturally, i don't see the point of getting any boob job done and it can actually backfire. If they're nice i love em, even if it's on a crazy vegan girl
fredflehoux wrote:I'm just not on the side of naturalist who rather have saggy beaver tails over big fake tits with a scar around the nipples. It's a matter of the girl's style too, if she rock the Brainless bimbo style, i kinda like she have fake tits like Rikki Six
Apparently Katrina Jade got her boobjob undone, i think her boobs were just perfect redone, now back to beaver tails i guess
fredflehoux wrote:If most pornstar especially the most popular have big natural tits or implants, it mean that's what most people want and will pay for.
poldijk wrote:
Iddaoeeok wrote:Ironically, I've noticed the best boob jobs are usually when women already have nice sized breasts with (especially) a good shape - and therefore don't need a boob job at all!
fredflehoux wrote:If most pornstar especially the most popular have big natural tits or implants, it mean that's what most people want and will pay for.
Ultra-Gape wrote:fredflehoux wrote:Natural selection, if it was so unpopular and wouldnèt increase their popularity they wouldn't do it as much, meanwhile natty tit only is a niche.
I'd recommend some of Richard Dawkins' books if you want to learn what natural selection actually is...
TheVulture wrote:fredflehoux wrote:If most pornstar especially the most popular have big natural tits or implants, it mean that's what most people want and will pay for.
There isn't really enough irony in the world to account for the fact that you accused me of a non sequitur and then made that statement, is there?
fredflehoux wrote:Ultra-Gape wrote:fredflehoux wrote:Natural selection, if it was so unpopular and wouldnèt increase their popularity they wouldn't do it as much, meanwhile natty tit only is a niche.
I'd recommend some of Richard Dawkins' books if you want to learn what natural selection actually is...
I hate the internet for making condescending idiots think they're smart and making it so smart people have to spoon-feed basic stuff to these idiots.
Science is my main interest since i'm like 7 yr old.. i know very well what natural selection mean, how it work and where it applies. I think you confuse the concept, like so many people, with evolution. natural selection is basically what the 2 word mean, a selective process that happen naturally. It doesn't affect genes only, it affect ideas, behavior, physical objects that cannot evolve, etc. Natural selection happen in a bag of chips when you shake it. The small broken pieces will all be at the bottom, the nice big and intact chips will all be at the top. Evolution s shape by natural selection, natural selection isn't evolution itself.
Navarre2033 wrote:Those girls are idiots who increased those nice natural boobs to ugly implants.
Here's another. What a sad thing to see.![]()
misangrenegra2 wrote:OLD TITS
NEW TITSIddaoeeok wrote:Ironically, I've noticed the best boob jobs are usually when women already have nice sized breasts with (especially) a good shape - and therefore don't need a boob job at all!
Is not a coincidence, if they have a good shape, size and are well located, definitely helps to get a better result.
At the end is the girls choice, our tastes doesnt matter at all. They have several reasons to get implants and is something that only concerns to them
fredflehoux wrote:stewpidaz wrote:TheVulture wrote: I certainly don't see it as "empowering" as some people say. I think it's the opposite of that. Dumbing down or whatever. Giving in to a sort of perceived modern consumer ideal that doesn't really exist.
I'm with you in the preference for natural, but I disagree about this part. You say the consumer ideal doesn't exist, but it DOES exist. The whole reason that plastic surgery is effective and gives women a self-esteem boost is because they get more attention. With boobs for example, even though I prefer natural, I am a minority. Most people here love the fake boobs, doesn't really matter as long as they are massive. The whole reason people found Lucie Wilde so attractive was her comically large and fake tits. I can see why getting plastic surgery done makes women feel empowered, and there have been studies that it has long lasting effects in boost to self-esteem. But it is a shame because I think it makes them look awful in a lot of cases.
Lucie wilde's tits were natty AF which made her hotter for that.
stewpidaz wrote: In which universe?
fredflehoux wrote:Do you know what it mean or you're just doing a "no you" comment like 5 yr old do? It cannot be more logically straightforward then this or please explain to me how it is a non-sequitur
TheVulture wrote:fredflehoux wrote:Do you know what it mean or you're just doing a "no you" comment like 5 yr old do? It cannot be more logically straightforward then this or please explain to me how it is a non-sequitur
Is this serious?
Here is your comment:
If most pornstar especially the most popular have big natural tits or implants, it mean that's what most people want and will pay for.
Non sequitur means "it does not follow". Your 2nd point does not follow from the 1st, it's just your interpretation being presented as fact.
OK?
I'm surprised I had to explain to you what non sequitur means when you used the term in this thread before me but hey ho.
fredflehoux wrote:Do you know what it mean or you're just doing a "no you" comment like 5 yr old do?
fredflehoux wrote:"If most pornstar especially the most popular have big natural tits or implants, it mean that's what most people want and will pay for"
i confess it might still be untrue, i'm not a porn producer after all i don't see the number i can only see the trends in what is available. Still it is logically consistent.
ryukenmaster666 wrote:In general, breast implants sucks. Maybe one 1% of models it is better, but it is an exceptional exception.
Down with the silicon ! Think of nature !
poldijk wrote:fredflehoux wrote:Do you know what it mean or you're just doing a "no you" comment like 5 yr old do?
I don't want to behave like the police officer but I think you could share your opinion without this kind of borderline comment
because this post is relevantfredflehoux wrote:"If most pornstar especially the most popular have big natural tits or implants, it mean that's what most people want and will pay for"
i confess it might still be untrue, i'm not a porn producer after all i don't see the number i can only see the trends in what is available. Still it is logically consistent.
whatever the business is, there will always be natural tits lovers like I (and a lot of members) do and I try to highlight it in my thread unless you show me a girl with a very beautiful silicon chest, please share
fredflehoux wrote:You tell me i should avoid saying some things and yet you quote me without refuting or adding anything to the conversation other then your personal opinion, which most do not care about, sorry.
fredflehoux wrote:I'm just not on the side of naturalist who rather have saggy beaver tails
Navarre2033 wrote:Breast implants disgust me. PERIOD!
Users browsing this forum: magizi87 and 34 guests