pastaga wrote:The main problem is the lack of diversity in the action. The only way they go is harder and harder anal, and nothing more.
visigoth2020111 wrote:
http://www.legalporno.com/watch/31345/n ... dap_gio194
this is exactly how a circus is run you let everyone do as they please
to my understanding of porn you need lust emotion on film, not some crazy bitch acting like she was on a headbangers concert all coke up
sorry but GIO194 was a waste of time specially Tina Kay
visigoth2020111 wrote:i was looking for a post to post my toughs and this is the best one related to
by no means is LP going down. just the usual mediocre contemn once in a wile
http://www.legalporno.com/watch/31345/n ... dap_gio194
this is exactly how a circus is run you let everyone do as they please
to my understanding of porn you need lust emotion on film, not some crazy bitch acting like she was on a headbangers concert all coke up
sorry but GIO194 was a waste of time specially Tina Kay
this is not the Ringling Bros circus or is it
Tastes Like Ass wrote:Well, it looks like no one actually responded to the specific criticisms I made. Instead, people either said, "Oh look, they're making a lot of money!" (so is Wicked; does that mean they make good porn?), or "Oh look, they put 2 dicks in the ass, and then 3 dicks in the ass, and then 4 dicks in the ass, and then 5 dicks in the ass", which I guess is great, if you think porn isn't about anything other than how many dicks you can stuff in the same hole. Personally, I need something more than that.
As for my actual complaint, that LP is becoming just like U.S. porn, since no one seemed to get it, I will explain it a bit more clearly. If you go back and look at LP (and before that, Sineplex/Evilutionplex, etc.), the things that always distinguished it from American porn were:
1. Classier looking girls, without all the tattoos and hairy bush that characterizes U.S. porn.
2. A focus on shooting the kind of action that fans wanted to see, which among other things, means none of the stupid vibrators, which the girls seem to like, but most fans hate.
3. Fetishes that are rare or nonexistent in U.S. porn, like piss and cream.
Now, LP is shooting more girls with lots of tattoos and/or pubic hair, they are starting to incorporate those stupid vibrators into more and more scenes, and they have totally abandoned piss, and virtually abandoned cream.
So, I will ask again: Aside from more MAP (multiple anal penetration), what makes LP any different from typical U.S. porn?
twistedvincent wrote:Gonzo and Sineplex continue to go to shit with the same tired actors shooting 4+ scenes a day and now with the addition of the complete has-been, grade C performer Marco"I Love Fiona"Banderas it's only going to get worse.
Giorgio on the other hand if fucking amazing!!
twistedvincent wrote:^ What do you mean his hands are tied?
Giorgio Grandi wrote:I strongly agree with the ownership to avoid piss/pissing.
Personally Im almost able with my content to get the same results as with pee 14 months ago. This means LP is getting bigger with more users, and probably my content are also even better.
Content with cream/milk are actually allowed, but personally I do not really like to shoot such stuff and in my opinion cream/milk lovers are already a minority of the actual audience.
You are probably not able to understand that the quality of hardcore (I speak personally about my content, I do not like to speak about others) is increased drastically since the no piss, so it created a bigger audience of hardcore lover that are is replacing the "pee" users.
The girls are still the key, but also with "not top girls" is now possible to have interesting results, something that in the "pissing time" was not possible to do.
So, technically LP is going downhill only for a minority of the users. All the people who claim that are not buying because "no piss" and "no cram" are evidently a small minority of the audience.
Example, to say that GIO194 has a terrible preview is not correct.Its a good and honest update and actually the scene is getting the results it supposed to get. Then if you do not like this scene, you simply do not buy the scene. I do not see the reason to degrade the content with negative comments because the video doesnt feature what you like.
But like I told you previously, protesters are just few comparing to the gross of the users.
Kaderon wrote:I am just tired of seeing the same (skinny) girls over and over and over and over again.
Arwen Gold
Suzan Ayn
Belle Claire
Crystal Greenvelle
May Thai
Arwen Gold
Suzan Ayn
Belle Claire
Crystal Greenvelle
May Thai
..
laura. wrote:^
It is amazing when you think about it. What is essentially a fairly niche hardcore porn site on a rapid ascent in popularity. Just think about that for a second, give or take one of the top 10,000 websites on the planet. A phenomenal achievement. Hopefully some of the lurkers will do what I did, stop lurking, sign up and enjoy the best porn money can buy
Giorgio Grandi wrote:I strongly agree with the ownership to avoid piss/pissing.
Personally Im almost able with my content to get the same results as with pee 14 months ago. This means LP is getting bigger with more users, and probably my content are also even better.
Content with cream/milk are actually allowed, but personally I do not really like to shoot such stuff and in my opinion cream/milk lovers are already a minority of the actual audience.
You are probably not able to understand that the quality of hardcore (I speak personally about my content, I do not like to speak about others) is increased drastically since the no piss, so it created a bigger audience of hardcore lover that are is replacing the "pee" users.
The girls are still the key, but also with "not top girls" is now possible to have interesting results, something that in the "pissing time" was not possible to do.
So, technically LP is going downhill only for a minority of the users. All the people who claim that are not buying because "no piss" and "no cram" are evidently a small minority of the audience.
Example, to say that GIO194 has a terrible preview is not correct.Its a good and honest update and actually the scene is getting the results it supposed to get. Then if you do not like this scene, you simply do not buy the scene. I do not see the reason to degrade the content with negative comments because the video doesnt feature what you like.
But like I told you previously, protesters are just few comparing to the gross of the users.
laura. wrote:^
It is amazing when you think about it. What is essentially a fairly niche hardcore porn site on a rapid ascent in popularity. Just think about that for a second, give or take one of the top 10,000 websites on the planet. A phenomenal achievement. Hopefully some of the lurkers will do what I did, stop lurking, sign up and enjoy the best porn money can buy
And who'd have thought Luxembourg was such a nation of wankers? x
Giorgio Grandi wrote:I strongly agree with the ownership to avoid piss/pissing.
Personally Im almost able with my content to get the same results as with pee 14 months ago. This means LP is getting bigger with more users, and probably my content are also even better.
Content with cream/milk are actually allowed, but personally I do not really like to shoot such stuff and in my opinion cream/milk lovers are already a minority of the actual audience.
You are probably not able to understand that the quality of hardcore (I speak personally about my content, I do not like to speak about others) is increased drastically since the no piss, so it created a bigger audience of hardcore lover that are is replacing the "pee" users.
The girls are still the key, but also with "not top girls" is now possible to have interesting results, something that in the "pissing time" was not possible to do.
So, technically LP is going downhill only for a minority of the users. All the people who claim that are not buying because "no piss" and "no cram" are evidently a small minority of the audience.
Example, to say that GIO194 has a terrible preview is not correct.Its a good and honest update and actually the scene is getting the results it supposed to get. Then if you do not like this scene, you simply do not buy the scene. I do not see the reason to degrade the content with negative comments because the video doesnt feature what you like.
But like I told you previously, protesters are just few comparing to the gross of the users.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:I the ownership to avoid piss/pissing.
Personally Im almost able with my content to get the same results as with pee 14 months ago. This means LP is getting bigger with more users, and probably my content are also even better.
Content with cream/milk are actually allowed, but personally I do not really like to shoot such stuff and in my opinion cream/milk lovers are already a minority of the actual audience.
You are probably not able to understand that the quality of hardcore (I speak personally about my content, I do not like to speak about others) is increased drastically since the no piss, so it created a bigger audience of hardcore lover that are is replacing the "pee" users.
The girls are still the key, but also with "not top girls" is now possible to have interesting results, something that in the "pissing time" was not possible to do.
So, technically LP is going downhill only for a minority of the users. All the people who claim that are not buying because "no piss" and "no cram" are evidently a small minority of the audience.
Example, to say that GIO194 has a terrible preview is not correct.Its a good and honest update and actually the scene is getting the results it supposed to get. Then if you do not like this scene, you simply do not buy the scene. I do not see the reason to degrade the content with negative comments because the video doesnt feature what you like.
But like I told you previously, protesters are just few comparing to the gross of the users.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:drevokocur66We would really going downhill in the moment we wont shoot anymore a girl who deosnt do anal fisting, we would go downhill in the moment we wont take the risk to shoot a content that doesnt fit all the wishes of the members.
I understand your frustration about the lack of content you wish to watch, but that doesnt mean we are going downhill. Just finish your ticket with what you like and maybe keep a smaller subscription, because Im sure there are still coming several scenes you will like.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:I strongly agree with the ownership to avoid piss/pissing.
Personally Im almost able with my content to get the same results as with pee 14 months ago. This means LP is getting bigger with more users, and probably my content are also even better.
Content with cream/milk are actually allowed, but personally I do not really like to shoot such stuff and in my opinion cream/milk lovers are already a minority of the actual audience.
You are probably not able to understand that the quality of hardcore (I speak personally about my content, I do not like to speak about others) is increased drastically since the no piss, so it created a bigger audience of hardcore lover that are is replacing the "pee" users.
The girls are still the key, but also with "not top girls" is now possible to have interesting results, something that in the "pissing time" was not possible to do.
So, technically LP is going downhill only for a minority of the users. All the people who claim that are not buying because "no piss" and "no cram" are evidently a small minority of the audience.
Example, to say that GIO194 has a terrible preview is not correct.Its a good and honest update and actually the scene is getting the results it supposed to get. Then if you do not like this scene, you simply do not buy the scene. I do not see the reason to degrade the content with negative comments because the video doesn't feature what you like.
But like I told you previously, protesters are just few comparing to the gross of the users.
bennko64 wrote:
Is it not true tho that lp could have just reduced the amount of pee scenes/Kreme scenes shot, rather than entirely stopping, then you would still see an increase in the number of people buying hardcore scenes and the people who bought pee scenes or Kreme scenes would still be using the site and not complaining about losing the content they used to buy, so the over all buyer numbers would be larger.
Why make the same amount of money when you can make more?
Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 62 guests