PornBox.com

My intention is to provide feedback that would help the producers, make movies that are more satisfying to watch.

This topic involves the performers, sexual acts, clothing, the set, camera work.

All of my feedback is going to aim at improving things that I like.

But I'll start by briefly mentioning everything Angelo Godshack Studio do, that I don't like.

Pissing, Bisexual content (like lesbian stuff and DAP, including all the sexual acts that require two or three dicks rubbing together) and NO interracial content.

Another major downside for me, is that the clothes that women wear, are usually unremarkable, and in almost all the scenes
the women high heels are removed early on. I would prefer if the high heels were kept on the whole runtime of the scene.

So far, this Lucy Mendez scene, is the one I have liked the most.



However, there are sexual positions that are fairly common in your movies that I dislike.

These positions, the thing they have in common, is that the two male genitals are touching each other TOO MUCH.
This is the thing that makes these movies appear as bisexual, in a way that is not appealing to a heterosexual fan like me.




Other things I dislike that are fairly common in some type of movies,
is manhandling the women so much that it makes them look ugly and go down in sexual attraction.
and worse still, often they look like they can't wait for the scene to be over
and the scene just keeps going, because they are professional, but it shouldn't continue.

To illustrate the ugly, this is a pretty sexy and beautiful lady
that you guys managed to make her look awful.


That's 9 minutes into the movie

And as you see the movie progress, it gets worse and worse,
don't go this far for money. Those movies are terrible.

I think you need to rename them, to something that
implies is going to be rougher than usual, but not all the time, with better pacing.

Currently, the intensity of THOSE movies, looks like this:



It would be a sexier, more satisfying movie, if the INTENSITY, had peaks and valleys.

You can still have extreme content like FISTING,
but you need to compensate with something more pleasant and calmed.



Eagle eye readers might notice that the second half of the movie's intensity,
is slightly higher than the first half.

As a low intensity moment, you can picture something sexy and hot.



Low intensity doesn't mean boring.

You need to see the woman, and if she starts to look miserable,
change pace immediately, lowering intensity by half.

You need to chill for a solid 10-15 mins.

You can also, change the way you make movies,
I imagine, you arrange a scene with a model,
before filming has started, you already decided is going to be a 100% hell or whatever else.

What if, instead of doing that, agree to spike intensity of the sex,
to the level of a 100% hell movie, and if the woman, can gracefully
do 45 mins of it, call it 100% hell, but if she needs varied pacing,
you call the movie something different.

or agree to lower the intensity of scenes, as it seems necessary.

Ok, moving on to more pleasant topics, camera work.

This gif, represents how I wish, the movies looked, 40 to 50 percent of the time:



At this camera distance from the action, you can easily see everything, nice and clear.

You can see the woman's head, her butt, the torso, the feet, hands, the penetration, all the men around her.

Everything is correct, it looks beautiful. The model body proportions look well,
Body proportions looking "correct" is critical to maintain her status as beautiful.
the aspect ratio of the video is flattering to the woman silhouette. Everything is as good as it gets.

However, close-ups, also exists. And are desirable, the other half of the runtime of the movie, should be close-ups.

I think close-ups, are the weakness of this studio.

This is the thing that messes up with the quality of the movie, visually.

First of all, close-ups, are usually not close enough.
If you want to highlight the model's face, her face, from eyebrows to chin,
should take almost to the whole screen from top to bottom.

Like this:


I had to edit this, to make it close enough.

But usually, close-ups to the face, are still far away enough,
to see her shoulders, upper arms and torso.
And depending on the situation, messes up with the model body proportions.
This makes her look disproportionate, that makes her look ugly.

Is the same problem with selfies taken with smartphones.
If you take a selfie, with the front facing camera of your phone,
and you don't put enough space, between your phone and your face,
your facial features would look incorrect, you would look "ugly".

People who are good with selfies know, that the arm that is holding the phone,
has to be extended as far away as they can from their face.

Because the camera lens used to film movies is much bigger than a phone,
is much easier to make people look correct in movies, but,
for best results, you want to isolate the model face, as close as possible,
for maximum satisfaction.



Trust me when I say that, seeing a beautiful face, with full 4K quality, when is just the face,
and nothing else, the experience, is unquantifiable much better, than, if you can also see
her upper half.

I think, the director gets a bit too greedy, and when highlighting the face,
he still wants to show the ass, the penetration.

So, what ends up happening, is that we get a view, that is half-way to a close-up,
and half-way too far for a wide nice view.

But it doesn't satisfy either one, it looks low quality camera work.



I think, you have three options that are excellent.

You show the FACE, real close, you show the penetration, pretty close too,
OR you step all the way back so we can see the whole thing nice.

Examples of highlights that don't compromise.



When you are filming a blowbang, if the cocks are not covering,
about half the screen form side to side, you are filming it wrong.



This was the secret sauce of the late Gonzo studio, if you ask me.

Just to make myself extra clear,
If you are close enough to the girl, that her arm takes half the screen.
You are too close, for a wide view, and you are to far for a close-up.
and the men are too far away from her, ask them to move in a bit closer.



SO, move a step back, maybe a few steps back, and make it look like this:



This is the airplane position, looking 100% awesome:



And this is exactly the same idea but executed 100% incorrectly.



I think, good camera work is all difference needed for sales.

Thats just my opinion.

If I continue to post, I'll add gifs that IMO feature, 100% correct camera work.

TY and Peace.

Wow, welcome back, magizi!

dap-addict wrote:Wow, welcome back, magizi!

hi,

xD


In truth I been lurking here and there


It seems pretty quiet lately.

What is the best AGS scene, in your opinion, DapAddict?

In my original post, I ran out of time to rant about outfits.

This I think is the most subjective part of my post.

I understand the whole thing subjective.

I'm going to start by using Nicole Black as reference, just so that when I compare outfits,
being modeled by the same woman.

Plus, I think she is hot.

Out of all the Nicole Black scenes that she has done under AGO

I like this one the most:



She doesn't turn around when she is still standing, which was a terrible loss.

Her hair looks amazing, historically she wears it, too straight for my taste.
I prefer when 20% or so, of hair is a bit chaotic, and the rest is in order, like this:



When all of the hair is straight, in order, it looks unnatural. Like in this Cindy scene.



Nice heels, the outfit greatly punctuates her silhouette.
The Black color contrast to great effect with her skin color.



However, the men, don't get the opportunity to do anything with it.
And by the 16-minute mark, the outfit gets removed, OFF SCREEN.
I got the non-piss version.

When I think about outfits in porn, in particular, hardcore gangbangs,
the outfit should be treated almost as a character.

Is more erotic, when the outfit serves two purposes,
to direct our view, into specific areas,



and to offer a barrier, resistance to the males urges, that must be peeled off.



Plus, a hot outfit, with a nice girl, can make legendary thumbnail that sells scenes. INSTANTLY.



And when I'm looking at your page, just looking at the thumbnails,
the outfits are so unremarkable.

What the fuck with these shoes:



Another big problem with outfits is the white wall in the background
and the amount of light it bounces.

There is so much light, that most colors that are not black,
are burn out, opaqued, they looked washed out.

I'm thinking you need a bit of black into the set.
maybe a black and white checkered floor, like the one Sineplex had.



Plus, cameras, produce better images, when there are reference colors in the scene.
when you look at your scenes, the ones where the woman was wearing black
those movies look better.

I'm not an expert at photography, buuuut
when I photoshop images, I'm always looking for blacks, to fix how the sky looks,
exposure, etc.

Black seems like one of the most important colors.

OK closing thoughts, the too long didn't read is

Make the women wear black more often, and for the love of god,
give them nice, obnoxiously sexy high heels.

Thank you for your very detailed post magi.

I have previously discussed the right approach to styling the girls, and also the avoidance of horrendous trainers/sneakers...which seems like a shocking and yet growing fad. In AGO's most recent 100% Hell scene with Isis Diamond, those sneakers return again.

As you correctly and rightly point out, a pair of sexy high heels goes a long way to making the scene seem more appealing.
Black is an universally accepted colour, and it is a colour that can match, complement most things well.

Why is the Nela Decker scene from June 10th 2025 not included in the membership?

More Feedback.



Since I joined I hoped to see more scenes feature Areta Ridera and we have gotten two scenes.

6 on 1 pure hardcore and, 2 hour Anal Wars.

I'm just gonna say that those movies were a bit dissapointing.

I didn't quite liked the camera work, and her TWO HOUR movie, doesn't feature Doggystyle DP or DAP at all. I would prefer DP.

Also my most disliked part in ALL of your scenes, is when the babe high heels are removed. Please film more movies without removing them.
Especially the 2 hour movies.

Areta Is quite good at looking at the camera, she is photogenic.
I think if you guys get her again, the director should dedicate more time filming her face, very close,
even in positions where traditionaly the camera is set to the side. And ask the guys to never take their hands off her boobs and hair.

Another thing that I find unsatisfaying about the 2 hour movies in general, is that they feel a bit too "check-listy"
I would like to see, in some of those movies, not always. Is to repeat the same position, multiple times, sprinckled
throught the movie, 3 or 4 different times, instead of the current formula, which is to include a bunch of different positions.
And each time the same position is repeated, it's excuted a little bit different.

Like penetrating her slower and deeper or faster and shallower. Fisting her holes in an another time,
penetrating her all the way in, and without pulling out the guys rotate the hip in a circular motion,
slapping her face, or all the guys french kiss her, pulling back her arms or hair, whatever, just make it each time look and feel different.

I like Doggy Style airthight the most. Would love to see a movie where the girl is DPed doggy style for half the duration of the movie,
split in 3-5 parts.

I can see some people loving the back and forth, but also, some people would really dislike this idea.

I think it would be wisest to repeat the position that makes the model in the movie, look the best.
Eventhough I like Doggy the most, if the model in the movie is Larissa Leite, I would prefer Cowgirl to admire her butt and curvy back side.
Or reverse cowgirl to enjoy her boobs and face. Multiple times in the same scene.

Anyways.

Lucianna Lucci, is prettier when she is experiencing a bit a pain IMO.



And the director nailed the camera work during the doggy DP



Would love to see her do a domition scene, or a 100% hell, dialed back as necessary.
(I would hate to see her suffer as much as Areta did, Lucianna pain face is quite enticing tho).



She also looks A LOT better in doggy at this time, because she has a bit of a belly at the moment.

Maybe film a scene with her, where, the focus is her face and butt cheeks. Blowjobs, doggy, prone, stanging against the wall, cowgirl, etc.

Exploit each model strenghts instead of follwing a formula that shows her weaknesses?

Aite, that's all for now.