Moderator: dan
SimplyStunning wrote:dap-addict wrote:Those statistics by Bird are great!
It just makes me wonder how AGO can pay girls that good while studio seems to perform soso? What's the trick behind? What's his business model?
I don't understand why you would think the stats are great, they are flawed! (...) So lets try an even the playing field by only considering studios in Czech Republic. Why ? Because when you are talking about cost (of a BUSINESS MODEL) you have to look at the whole picture of doing business (and cost of living is a factor).Czech vs Colombia, it is 2.5x more expensive to do business in Czech
*** So if I wanted to start a porn studio, it would definitely be in Colombia ***
Czech vs Brazil, it is 1.6x more expensive to do business in Czech
Czech vs Russia, it is 1.4x more expensive to do business in Czech
Czech vs USA, it is 1.8x more expensive to do business in USA
Back to considering Prague studios only. These eight professional studio come to mind:(total scenes in 2023 / labeled Piss scenes) ---> scenes in Top 60
Giorgio Grandi___________(132 / 62) ---> 8
Angelo Godshack Original__(91 / 43) ---> 24
Porn Wrold______________ (68 / 2) ---> 20
Giorgio's Lab____________ (37 / 16) ---> 0
Gonzo__________________ (32 / 11) ---> 5
Ferrero Anal Experience___ (25 / 9) ---> 0
Xfreaxx_________________(23 / 5) ---> 3
Interracial Vision_________ (23 / 22) ---> 0
JBird wrote:Looks as if some chucklehead has been at work on the AGO model popularity list. Veronica Leal, Eden Ivy, Baby Kitten, Maddy Black and Nicole Black are no longer in the top 50. Much as I admire Kitty Doll88, having her top of the Russian models there (below) is comical. Having Madison Quinn second is farcical.
The studio may not be responsible but perhaps it doesn’t matter. Being a laughing stock could be preferable to being an object of dislike and/or distaste, which looks to be AGO’s current stock with plenty of fans.
lp-fan wrote:They have deleted the scene with Monika Fox from
2023-01-42 Monika Fox 6on1 Domination gangbang DP/DVP/DAP, anal creampie & swallow (both with pee and without)
But why?
feltrough wrote:lp-fan wrote:They have deleted the scene with Monika Fox from
2023-01-42 Monika Fox 6on1 Domination gangbang DP/DVP/DAP, anal creampie & swallow (both with pee and without)
But why?
what ?they should give out the reason when deleting scene or no?
DPraved wrote:I agree with Simply stunning. I very much prefer the AGO style of gangbanging over most other studios. The pacing and intensity really makes a difference and considering that the models return to the studio time and again suggest that the experience is not as horrible as the acting sometimes makes it appear.
I suspect much of the criticism here originates from AGO treating multiple pussy penetration as an equal citizen to multiple anal penetration and I don't think many critics would be as vocal if these were 0% pussy gangbangs. Many GG scenes have shown models in just as much discomfort but for some reason without this level of outrage.
visigoth2020260 wrote:feltrough wrote:lp-fan wrote:They have deleted the scene with Monika Fox from
2023-01-42 Monika Fox 6on1 Domination gangbang DP/DVP/DAP, anal creampie & swallow (both with pee and without)
But why?
what ?they should give out the reason when deleting scene or no?
that is not nice, put it back on...we are sick of vanilla porn.
AngeloGodshack wrote:feltrough wrote:lp-fan wrote:They have deleted the scene with Monika Fox from
2023-01-42 Monika Fox 6on1 Domination gangbang DP/DVP/DAP, anal creampie & swallow (both with pee and without)
But why?
what ?they should give out the reason when deleting scene or no?
that is not nice, put it back on...we are sick of vanilla porn.
rudy464 wrote:This AGO-Scene with Mell Branco is amazing. I think Mell is cute and she has a great ass, but wasn't expecting anything special from the scene. But I'm thrilled how she's being fucked by the guys and how she enjoyed it.
isis111 wrote:What a disgust this is, for the third day in a row, 1on1 videos are out, it's fucking boring, hey Angelo, bring girls with big ass and big boobs and give them a gangbang, 1on1 and even with skinny girls, it's fucking boring and not worth buying
CursedLemon wrote:For me there are still production quality issues preventing me buying more AGO scenes, especially when compared to GG and especially NRX
1. The camera Angelo uses in not of good enough quality IMO, the focal length is too short on the lens giving the impression that things are 'zoomed out' and skinnier than they are and the colour/detail reproduction from the camera itself is nowhere near as good as the studios above.
2. The lighting is still really amateur, there are bright unfiltered lights pointing from behind the setup into the camera lens which is something you would be taught on day 1 lighting to never do for many reasons. There should be layers of diffused lighting mixed with natural if available to create depth and soft shadows. By not doing this you make the production look 'cheap' in comparison to rivals and make the scene less pleasing on the eye which in turn lowers sales. This is not a matter of 'preference' it's a matter of created the best product you can if you want the studio to be as successful as it can. I posted a picture a few pages back showing how Sweetie Plum looks in a GG shot, compare that to how Sweetie looked in an AGO shot and tell me who looks better? That's a major problem with not addressing this issue, you can pay for the best most beautiful girls, have them perform great but they still look worse on your production than when they shoot for your competitors. If Angelo doesn't have the knowledge to fix this issue (which is perfectly understandable) then hiring a lighting specialist and show them NRX, GG's lighting and say you want to get something that looks like or better, talk about diffused lighting setup etc.
3. This is partially down to the camera's colour reproduction I think, but the colours used on the set are still far too bland. Literally everything apart from the cushions are the same shade of white, there is no depth in colour, no variety in neutral tones like Giorgio it's like a washed out hospital. It's not that bad but combined with the 2 points above it makes it much worse, room for improvement here.
AngeloGodshack wrote:
I'm sorry guys, I'm very busy but try do my best and behere more online. I got message from management that scene "Monika Fox 6on1 Domination gangbang" is too much... I felt also disappointed. Inspite of having video proof from Monika that everything was totally ok for her and all scene is just "excelent performance" from Monika, scene was removed
House MD wrote:AngeloGodshack wrote:
I'm sorry guys, I'm very busy but try do my best and behere more online. I got message from management that scene "Monika Fox 6on1 Domination gangbang" is too much... I felt also disappointed. Inspite of having video proof from Monika that everything was totally ok for her and all scene is just "excelent performance" from Monika, scene was removed
paobroncix01 wrote:I wonder why we did never see Sandra Soul working for AGO. I think she would be such a perfect model for AGO, she is beautiful, she would be perfect for a DP, DAP, DPP scene at AGO. Angelo did work with her already, before AGO studio. What do you think, Angelo?
feltrough wrote:paobroncix01 wrote:I wonder why we did never see Sandra Soul working for AGO. I think she would be such a perfect model for AGO, she is beautiful, she would be perfect for a DP, DAP, DPP scene at AGO. Angelo did work with her already, before AGO studio. What do you think, Angelo?
she retired.
rroper472 wrote:Are there no girls in Prague?? ...Just the same old faces swapped around....BORING!!
Return to Angelo Godshack Original
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests