Thank you Blue for these pictures, I like them

Panorama is right, let's not start an argument. I'm also not here to start a fight with anyone.
Now, thanks to Panorama, we know that the West is morally and ethically superior to the East, and that Woodman "hides" in Eastern Europe, well, so be it.
My point is, we need to have a fact-based analysis instead of making general statements.
Let's look at the facts and analyse why Woodman lives in Eastern Europe and not in France.
The first reason is historical. In the late nineties and early 2000s, a large majority of porn models were Hungarian. Therefore, most European porn producers moved there so that they could be on the spot. Many moved: not only Woodman but also Rocco, Le Castel, Christophe Clark and many others. (then, it changed, there was a Czech wave and now the majority are from Russia, but that's another story and those who had moved to Hungary remained there, whereas "newer" porn producers went to CZ, that's why pornbox/AV is based there).
The second reason is the agencies. Porn agencies are forbidden in France. They are authorised and operate in the US, in Hungary, in Czech Republic, and I think also in Spain (I'm not sure of this last one), etc... We all know that Woodman is getting old, he can't catch girls in the street or in malls as he used to do 25 years ago, on the one hand because of his current looks and on the other hand because the world has changed, girls have changed, and yes, even in Eastern European, even in Hungary, girls are not impressed any more when they see a foreigner, whereas it was very, very different in the 90s (and I can say without any exaggeration that I know the country very well, girls there are not as naive any more as some here would like to believe). So, Woodman needs the agencies in order to find him girls. Without the agencies, he cannot do anything.
And here we are at the core of the problem. If an agency, be it Czech or Hungarian, sends him a model whereas the model wrote "no anal" and/or "no old man", the responsibility is with the agency in the first place. Because they will have deceived the model.
My understanding is that Woodman does not appear in such a good light with Hungarian courts these days and xxx announced that Woodman recently lost a case before a Hungarian court.
But the question is what the legal basis would be to have a Hungarian court, say, forbid his castings. If you can't prove he has done something illegal, nothing can be done.
Many porn companies that deceived models were closed in the recent months, see GDP in the US or Czech Casting in CZ. if it did not happen with him, it's because there was no model who went to the police against him or actually against the agency. There was also no generalised [spam] shitstorm linked to him (see for instance FakeTaxi in the UK who was accused of abusing models and who got a big [spam] shitstorm or see French Bukkake in France who seemingly was raping girls and treating them like meat and got arrested after an article in the press following some girls taking a stance on [spam]).
To conclude, I would say that it would be for models to take a stance. If we see more and more models claim that they had a problem with him, as I think happened with some models recently, and if that appears somewhere in the press or on the public domain, things could evolve.
But let's not lose time with general statements...