joachim-kessef wrote:i dont know how i can explain now if it mistake to book some girls which are not extremely hardcore
(...)
you dont notice those girls the dont come back in my studio anymore?
that you dont see that is the problem it mean we try the girl yes i give chance to them if the perform it not good i stop to book them
I separated Joachims sentences to make it more understandable. Some use "." and "," but Joachim writes like stream of consciousness. Most important is, it is understandable.
Now what he said is true: With many bookings a director just doesn't know whether a girl can really perform what she agrees to try.
If she cannot do it, the only way to safe the scene - and please remember there is already a lot of money invested and also 1 to 7 studs contracted to fuck her! - is to make it softer for her, i.e. tip fucking and/or having anchor stud not moving in DAP and/or even let him pretend he's in her ass, but basically its only upper stud fucking her, its only single anal.
At IV you have usually no fake in this situation, which is really good.
But you get the lazy anchor trick or tip fucking.
Me, I'd live with it, because its always worth to try to get the maximum out of a girl willing to try.
You my have noticed that IV shot a lot of DAPbreakin' scenes always. Its ace!
But of course it is a risk to shoot such demanding acts of course.
I praise Joachim for doing it!
(Yes, Joachim, we may disagree about 1 French girl and some other things at your studio, but this doesn't change the fact that I do honor your work and buy lots of it.)
(Oui, Joachim, nous pouvons ne pas être d'accord sur 1 fille française et d'autres choses dans ton studio, mais ce ne change pas le fait j'honor ton travaille et je n'en achète pas mal.)
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:29 am
