PornBox.com

What are you guys doing that I see a decline in quality? Are you going to fuck only ugly bitches, or old ones or full of tattoos only? The photos are horrible, nor do they look like the photos of the first scenes of the site! It is necessary to renege with the bad sets of photos of niches like Gonzo or Giorgio, above now you who had the best photos also ruin them? How good it would be to get back to the initial quality... regards!

I agree, they seem to get only ugly girls and grannies and they are very low quality studio .. I thought the glam porn studio had the best model quality girls in LP,and these guys seems to be struggling to get some decent models .. pathetic studio IV.

I suppose there are those who like it, there has to be everything as far as tastes are concerned. We hope the quality will improve soon, I consider it as a constructive criticism.

Greetings,

so far i shot only 1 girl who can said she is old only for my view 1 now who is the ugly ?show me specific exemple then we continue the discussion

lol stop saying s**t , IV has been the best studio for LP these last 2 months, at least they spare us daily repetition with fresh models .Keep the good work Joachim

thanks so much

I agree, I started to like IV studio because it's the only one that shoots regulary more interesting girls like hot anal MILFs, busty ladies, big asses!!!

Partly agree: IV is the studio shooting most DAPbreakin's compared to their whole output.
For me its really important that a studio motivates new girls to try DAP.
Its sure not all girls can do it, some need a lot of time to get good at DAP, but IV has shot so many DAPbreakin's also of girls who later became DAP Queens at other LP studios.
That iss a big pioneer work of Joachim and his team!

thanks but it not easy as you see i shot news girls some of them are bad truly but only one can handle the hardcore i love fisting double anal but she is coming
girls need to start somehow but we are trying thanks to support us