PornBox.com

All month I'm always waiting to see at least some "black dudes only" anal scenes with the top LP girls:

- Alita Angel
- Anna De Ville
- Cherry Kiss
- Cindy Shine
- Emily Pink
- Florane Russell
- Francesca Palma
- Freya Dee
- Ginebra Bellucci
- Helena Moeller
- Juicy Leila
- July Sun
- Isabella De Laa
- Kate Rich
- Kira Thorn
- Kris Owl
- Kristy Black
- Lady Zee
- Lara Frost
- Light Fairy
- Lina Luxa
- May Fiesta
- Mia Sanders
- Milady
- Mina
- Nata Paradise
- Natasha Teen
- Nicole Black
- Paola Hard
- Parish
- Pinky Breeze
- Rebecca Volpetti
- Renata Fox
- Sara Bell
- Scarlet Domingo
- Sofi Smile
- Stasia Si
- Sweetie Plum
- Veronica Leal
- Whiteneko
- Etc..

However I always get disappointed that if they at least happen to show up during the month, they are at best mixed scenes, or at worse white dudes only scenes.



It is always a disappointment not to see those "black dudes only" anal scenes with those top girls in LP. Some months we may get lucky, and get one scene, but it is becoming rare.

I guess we are forced to keep buying Dylan Brown scenes because there is nothing better in Gonzo or GIO lately.

I'm not saying all scenes should be like that, but out of all the scenes that come out, at least throw us a couple so we can have something to look forward at the end of the month.

I agree with you. Everyday I wait to see for the new release the same boring disgusting video like pee,transfastit or all white man video.if you see on suggestion sites by far people requesting for interracial scene but unfortunately what we see is skinny dude Dylan or the fake black Tony.why is freddy,Mike yves they don,t get a big role no clue. Look recently GONZO shoot freddy and oscar with Isabella della 2 on 1 within two weeks over 200.000 thousand people watched it and still continue. I really don't understand the reasoning why they don't see more of black only video on GONZO or GIERGIO studio. This will be answer only by those two guys. I hope they answered for the question me and other people asking for long time.

I love Dylan Brown's work because he at least does some balls deep, but he can't possibly do all the work, he is single handling keeping LP afloat, and people are forced to buy mixed scenes, but they are going to get tired eventually. We want some real goods at least every now and then.

No problem to ask respectfully for what you want. Nobody is forced to buy anything. People just buy what they want. If customers wanted 100% interracial then studios would make and sell only interracial. Studios have the sales data, and they make other genres because they can sell more by mixing it up.

avanfurwet wrote:No problem to ask respectfully for what you want. Nobody is forced to buy anything. People just buy what they want. If customers wanted 100% interracial then studios would make and sell only interracial. Studios have the sales data, and they make other genres because they can sell more by mixing it up.

Yes, if you read my post I respectfully asked, and I even mentioned that just a couple would be fine. I specifically said that not everything has to be this way.

In fact, I ask because unless someone mentions it, people at LP may not even be aware of it.

People are going to buy something, so they buy mixed scenes because there is nothing else.

But how can people buy something that isn't available? It has to exist first before they buy it.

I'm not saying they don't exist, they have existed in the past and they have sold well, all of them. They are just so rare that maybe that's why they forget how well they sell.

Keep in mind I said with the top girls. If you are putting a bunch of MILF content of blacks only videos, then the results will definitely not be the same.

I'll say it again, I'm not saying make every video like that, just do a couple so people have something good to look forward.

Well, for me an interracial scene has always a particular fascination: I like really more to see a white woman having her ass smashed by Big Black Cocks. And the industry has recognized it and has reacted with the BBC notion/tag and with sites specialised in this genre.
But, as always, variety is the spice of life: so I certainly don't want to see exclusively IR porn (by the way also nice reverse interracial), but also white with white, black with black and different combinations.

stratogustav wrote:

avanfurwet wrote:No problem to ask respectfully for what you want. Nobody is forced to buy anything. People just buy what they want. If customers wanted 100% interracial then studios would make and sell only interracial. Studios have the sales data, and they make other genres because they can sell more by mixing it up.

Yes, if you read my post I respectfully asked, and I even mentioned that just a couple would be fine. I specifically said that not everything has to be this way.

In fact, I ask because unless someone mentions it, people at LP may not even be aware of it.

People are going to buy something, so they buy mixed scenes because there is nothing else.

But how can people buy something that isn't available? It has to exist first before they buy it.

I'm not saying they don't exist, they have existed in the past and they have sold well, all of them. They are just so rare that maybe that's why they forget how well they sell.

Keep in mind I said with the top girls. If you are putting a bunch of MILF content of blacks only videos, then the results will definitely not be the same.

I'll say it again, I'm not saying make every video like that, just do a couple so people have something good to look forward.

You were respectful, unlike another poster. Doesn't change my point which was simply that studios make what sells and nobody is forced to buy anything. Also, I don't think Pornbox's computer forgets how well each scene sells.

Back in January some genius claimed that "80-90 percent of the new scenes this month are all black dudes on white girls" which was nonsense of course. I don't know or care what the percentage is now. Somebody who did care could do the work to find out.

avanfurwet wrote:[Doesn't change my point which was simply that studios make what sells and nobody is forced to buy anything.

Honestly that point has no place in this thread because it has nothing to do with what the topic is about.

The point of this thread is that there should should be a couple of videos like that every month so costumers have some to look forward.

Also the software likely doesn't recognize the difference between all black and mixed scenes because they are all tagged BBC.

On top of that the software may not know the difference between all black with top girls and those that are not, because there is a clear difference.

So because of those limitations that's why is necessary to voice it out.

grey00owl wrote:Well, for me an interracial scene has always a particular fascination: I like really more to see a white woman having her ass smashed by Big Black Cocks. And the industry has recognized it and has reacted with the BBC notion/tag and with sites specialised in this genre.
But, as always, variety is the spice of life: so I certainly don't want to see exclusively IR porn (by the way also nice reverse interracial), but also white with white, black with black and different combinations.

Yes, if you actually read the post it never says all scenes should be like that, just a couple. So that comment is completely out of place and doesn't belong in this thread because no one is asking for 100% Interracial scenes.

Just do a couple every month so costumes have something good to look forward.

stratogustav wrote:

avanfurwet wrote:[Doesn't change my point which was simply that studios make what sells and nobody is forced to buy anything.

Honestly that point has no place in this thread because it has nothing to do with what the topic is about.

The point of this thread is that there should should be a couple of videos like that every month so costumers have some to look forward.

Also the software likely doesn't recognize the difference between all black and mixed scenes because they are all tagged BBC.

On top of that the software may not know the difference between all black with top girls and those that are not, because there is a clear difference.

So because of those limitations that's why is necessary to voice it out.

Not trying to rain on your parade. If you just want to complain because the studios don't make enough for you personally of exactly what you want, then go for it.

If you think that more interracial scenes can sell better then you can make your case (but you haven't yet).

Nobody suggested you are asking for 100% interracial. Perhaps you could take your own advice and read what other people post. I said studios know their market and make scenes accordingly. If the studios thought enough people wanted more interracial they would make more, up to 100% if that's what sold for them. Because their only motivation is to make what sells. Although they do face some constraints with a limited number of black actors working in Europe.

We know the software names the actors (mostly), and the studios know who they are.
The studios also know who they consider top girls, and their list may not be the same as yours.
They have data and a business to run. You only know what you want. This thread just your personal request. That's fine, but that's all.

avanfurwet wrote:Not trying to rain on your parade. If you just want to complain because the studios don't make enough for you personally of exactly what you want, then go for it.

If you think that more interracial scenes can sell better then you can make your case (but you haven't yet).

Nobody suggested you are asking for 100% interracial. Perhaps you could take your own advice and read what other people post. I said studios know their market and make scenes accordingly. If the studios thought enough people wanted more interracial they would make more, up to 100% if that's what sold for them. Because their only motivation is to make what sells. Although they do face some constraints with a limited number of black actors working in Europe.

We know the software names the actors (mostly), and the studios know who they are.
The studios also know who they consider top girls, and their list may not be the same as yours.
They have data and a business to run. You only know what you want. This thread just your personal request. That's fine, but that's all.

Again your comments are extremely out of place mostly because the way you phrase them.

You make it seem as if I'm demanding more black scenes because they will sell more than the others.

Yes, a couple is more than none, but when you say more it is so vague that someone can assume I mean a lot of scenes.

Then just because those scenes sell well it doesn't mean I'm saying those are the ones that sell the most, those are different things.

Obviously they do sell well because when they come out they always appear as at the top of the best selling scenes.

I know this because that's the first page I visit and so far that has been the case.

But that doesn't mean they are the ones that sell the most overall because after all they are rare, and the software is unlikely to categorize them specifically considering all the tags are shared with other types of scenes that are different like mixed scenes or scenes with non top girls.

By top girls I mean the girls the studios themselves pick at the end of the year for their year specials. From the ones I mentioned only Nikki Hill hasn't made it because she was relatively new earlier this year.

So you are not raining the parade you are just talking unrelated stuff that has nothing to do with what I'm talking here.

^ You're complaining you don't get enough of what you want.
You produced no evidence, but assume for the sake of argument it's true which is why you're complaining.

I'm saying the studios will only make more of what you want if it works for them commercially.
And if it works for them commercially I questioned why aren't they doing it already?
Maybe they will be persuaded by your claims that they forgot their own sales numbers.
And their customers are forced to buy other scenes.
And Dylan Brown is keeping LP afloat single-handed.

So you think questioning your claims is "extremely out of place".
That's OK, carry on.
Perhaps one or more posters will agree with you?
Maybe that's all you want.
Good luck.

avanfurwet wrote:^ You're complaining you don't get enough of what you want.
You produced no evidence, but assume for the sake of argument it's true which is why you're complaining.

I'm saying the studios will only make more of what you want if it works for them commercially.
And if it works for them commercially I questioned why aren't they doing it already?
Maybe they will be persuaded by your claims that they forgot their own sales numbers.
And their customers are forced to buy other scenes.
And Dylan Brown is keeping LP afloat single-handed.

So you think questioning your claims is "extremely out of place".
That's OK, carry on.
Perhaps one or more posters will agree with you?
Maybe that's all you want.
Good luck.

I think you get so massively confused because you keep missing the fact that you can't quantify the performance of those specific videos because they share tags with videos that are totally different. So even though they have all performed well, you can't differentiate it unless you look them up individually.

So in other words this has to be voice out. There is no way around. Also you also forgot a basic principle in all businesses which is that when people starts voicing out something sincerely it means a lot of people feel the same way because ultimately most costumers won't voice out anything.

I'm also not demanding more in the sense of making many, just make a few so people have something good to look forward.

About Dylan Brown I don't e en have ti clarify that he is single handling keeping LP afloat for Mee personally because I'm the one saying, so obviously I mean for me personally, which likely according to basic economics it represents the feelings of many other people too, and that's why I don't need people to agree with me consideringering it is fair to assume many already do.

Gonzo is doing a great job with their interracial scenes. They use great guys that I approve. Freddy Gong, Yves Morgan, Mike, Oscar Batty... keep 'em coming.

Yes, any video with Mike Chapman is always great. Dylan Brown is a great balls deep fucker, and Freddy Gong is so dark that he makes everything look a lot cooler.

I've never understood the push for "interracial" as a genre. I don't mind it, and I'm certainly not offended by the use of the term, but it never really bothers me whether the guys are black or white, or whether they are "mixed" or homogenous.

Mister Ananas wrote:I've never understood the push for "interracial" as a genre. I don't mind it, and I'm certainly not offended by the use of the term, but it never really bothers me whether the guys are black or white, or whether they are "mixed" or homogenous.

Actually the genre "Interracial", or the "Big Black Cock" notion/tag are for definition racist. But never mind: it's just awesome to see a white model ravaged by black guys. It's definitely something special.

Yeah, I know they are racist, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

(And here we go...)

There can be any number of legitimate reasons why people seek out, or indeed prefer, interracial pairings. Some people are simply attracted to black men and/or white women. Some customers are black men, and having male performers in front of the camera are also black encourages self-projection into the scene. Other customers just enjoy the color contrast on a purely visual level. All of these things are racial preferences, it's true, and therefore they are racist by definition. However, are they harmful? I guess it all depends on how you define the word "racism", which seems to be changing a lot lately... but that is part of an entirely separate conversation for another time and place.

Mister Ananas wrote:I've never understood the push for "interracial" as a genre. I don't mind it, and I'm certainly not offended by the use of the term, but it never really bothers me whether the guys are black or white, or whether they are "mixed" or homogenous.

Well, as much as we want to say all humans are equal, we can't deny objective reality, black studs simply look better fucking girls than us white dudes do, they generally have bigger dicks, and they look more like what a warrior would look like, so the sex with the opposite physically weaker sex looks absolutely more intense, and that contrast is what makes it more awesome to watch.

I have nothing against white dudes fucking girls, as long as the girls get fucked properly I don't care who does it. If a white stud is prone boning a girl, making her lick his ass, peeing on her, and going balls deep in her ass with deep hard pounding, that makes me happy too, but I do prefer the contrast.

^ Now that is racist.

I thought you were going to say misogynistic. Honestly it wouldn't surprise me with the amount of brainwashing going on in the public media.

Well, as much as we want to say all humans are equal, we can't deny objective reality

Here we go...

black studs simply look better fucking girls than us white dudes do, they generally have bigger dicks, and they look more like what a warrior would look like

#1 is your own opinion, #2 is not statistically true, and #3 is just a fucking weird thing to say. Like what a warrior would look like? What does that even mean? Dude, look at Charlie Mac. Jon Jon. Sean Michaels. Joachim Kessef. Oscar Batty. All great performers and nice guys, and I've met or spoken to most of them (except Oscar, wassup man I know u reading lol), but let's be honest, they do not look like warriors. No offense to those guys, but I can't see any of them charging a fort or snapping some dude's neck like General Butt Naked. That is your racism projecting a primitive "feral man" archetype onto black men.

Alright, fine, let's talk about the race thing for a minute.

First of all, I'm not completely retarded. Let's just lead off with that. I do realize that racial differences are not limited to skin color, and I also realize that there are objective, measurable genetic deviations between whites and blacks (and Asians and Native Americans, et cetera) which cannot be ignored. Black people, for example, are far more prone to have sickle cell anemia, which began as a genetic mutation favored by natural selection because it protects against malaria. Black people have also been shown to have higher natural athletic ability. (Yes, scientifically.) That's all true, and I acknowledge it and don't really care about treading lightly to avoid some "politically correct" bullshit.

But that's all very different from the stuff you're talking about. The existence of racial differences does not validate every single racist notion you have rattling around in your head by default, nor does it give you carte blanche to project those notions onto other people. The image of the strong, well-endowed black warrior, whose untamed nature grants him primal sexual proficiency that women can't resist, comes straight out of the old "Mandingo" caricature from the days of slavery over 150 years ago. It's clearly racist, since it contrasts the base "primality" of black men against the civilized order of white men, which also implies that black men must be "tamed" like animals to adapt to our system, but will always retain some element of their animal nature no matter what you do. Don't even deny it, man. You know it, I know it, we all know it. Too often, the interracial genre feeds into this image, which is a big reason why everyone thinks "interracial" is a racist category and you now have websites like IAFD getting rid of it entirely. (It doesn't have to be a racist category, and I don't personally have a problem with the label itself, but too often it is used in a racist way and that's what I'm talking about here.)

Now before you say anything, this has nothing to do with BLM, SJWs, or any other three-letter movements pushed by three-letter organizations *cough* allegedly *cough*. (That's a totally separate discussion anyway; I am not going to open the Pandora's Box of tension and political rage that BLM carries with it today. No discussions about communism or cultural Marxism here.) I've been talking about racism in porn, here and elsewhere, for years. Not very often, but on occasion... and I've been consistent in my views the entire time.

Racism is thinking your race is superior than the other, not these concepts modern narratives seem to promote for political reasons.

There is nothing racist about stereotypes, the problem is that stereotypes can be used in a racist context, but those are different things.

For example the idea that having a primal look is a bad thing is only in your head. There is nothing wrong with looking primal, I personally see it as an asset most black men have.

Even your idea of warrior may be different than mine. For me warrior means athleticism, and you even said the Pelé, Mike Tyson, Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods, SonicFox, etc., of the world are mostly black, so there is nothing racist about having that notion.

Maybe statistically they don't have the biggest dicks, but I have watched a lot of porn, and at least in the porn industry they seem to be the longer ones in general. I like to see balls deep, so this is a good thing.

Go read this: viewtopic.php?f=96&t=27890
And don't try to match your personal perverted cuckold fantasies to facts and reality.
Black guys has limp dicks and boring AF. Noone likes to see them except a few cuckolds on this forum, who posting so much that it feels like it's a voice of many people.
I watched a trailer with Joachim Kessef a few minutes ago, the guy looks like he's about to have a heart attack.

I'm not black ^^°, but it doesn't mean I am butthurt that Lewis Hamilton is the best driver in F1. The way you are talking about limp dicks sound like that's the case. Of course you don't have to be very smart to understand I'm talking figuratively.

The best porn is balls deep BBC on white girls, the contrast makes it so much better, and of course I don't need to clarify that's just my opinion, if I'm the one saying it, it means it is just my opinion, that clarification doesn't need to be made, you don't have to be very smart to at least understand that.

You're both racist. This has devolved into yet another thread full of people screaming at each other about what they like.

You are calling people racist without evidence. Stereotypes are not racist. But yeah, it does seem like the thread is going towards what we like, just like many other threads.

Ley those BBC's go full ball deep anal

Let those BBC's go full ball deep anal

We got two of these videos in one day, which is fantastic, one Sara Bell, and one Vero Leal over GIO. You guys made my day.