PornBox.com

Just wondering wheter we we have a +20% pay rise compared to end 2018 at gonzo?


Suspicion is based on the fact of us paying 0,7tkt more for a 2on1 DP with Nelya Smalls just released than the June 2018 shot DP.
Now 1st DP shot in June was Angelo & Portro, Dec shot DP has Angelo & Ed. Ed might be a bit more expensive, but sure not a $$$ sum transformed fairly to 0,7tkt!
Second reason, maybe Nelya is asking a bit more for DP after her Autumn success @ LP?
With her LP notoriety gained she could try to dictate her fees more.
But again, as much as transformed 0,7tkt?!

Nelya DP would have to be quite much over 1k, hardly possible, its no DAP after all!

https://www.legalporno.com/model/3999/nelya_smalls ----> compare tkt prices!

dap, you're not expecting honest reason from LP, are you? LMAO

dap-addict wrote:Just wondering wheter we we have a +20% pay rise compared to end 2018 at gonzo?

Looks rather like pricing inconsistencies.
Lina Luxa's 4on1 DAPbreakin' from Dec for instance cost 5,3tkt, her 2nd DAP released tonight based on 3on1 without Potro is 4,3 tkt.
Now again its hardly really possible that Potro's fee is as much as 0,7tkt (+ 0,2tkt for Lina for taking 4 studs more).
Could be that her 1st DAP got a breakin' up-mark, though.

kidloco2 wrote:dap, you're not expecting honest reason from LP, are you? LMAO

What's that supposed to mean? Scene is more expensive because we paid her more. That being said we don't have to provide any explanation for the pricing, especially to a user who was never interested by the scene in the first place.

I haven't bought it yet, because I am considering the flat rate for January. Already 4 scenes needed - and it it will mount to 10 it pays.

But, xxx, it shows that the old system is still working, i.e. the higher the investment the more expensive the scene.
2nd it also shows that LP is still very fair as well to users as performers:
You tested her for 1 cheaper rate, she performed fine and you proposed her more $$$ for 2nd DAP out of your own initiative.
And than of course this higher investment is been passed on to users - and I think all of us agree that Lina Luxa is top and well worth a bit more.


Btw, this transparent way is one of the reasons I have grown to really like that ticket system. It gives users much more transparency and also kind of responsibility, ie. if we ask high price scenes like 5+on1 or DAP, we have to be prepared to pay more.

edit: xxx, thanks for answering, even you took wrong assumptions.
In general I'd hope for a bit more goodwill, though! You might also wanna check how much I spend overall on LP, just in case of doubt.

xxx wrote:

kidloco2 wrote:dap, you're not expecting honest reason from LP, are you? LMAO

What's that supposed to mean? Scene is more expensive because we paid her more. That being said we don't have to provide any explanation for the pricing, especially to a user who was never interested by the scene in the first place.

Ok, shooting back a bit fast actually. I've already commented on that. Goodis I feel gonzo is still bound to transparent way of doing porn biz kicked off by LP.

Now let me add sth from users POV - the more as xxx announced we were on the verge of abandoning ticket system and exchanging it for a flat rate system.
minus - being offered a flat rate for certain studios, here gonzo, as a consumer it actually holds me back from getting that flat rate early each month. It makes me waiting how many scenes of given studio I rally need, makes me calculating additional LP investments and compare it with tkt prices. And in the end while buying other studios offers for my tickets I may even forget about those gonzo scenes I wanted to buy by mid or end of given month. The flat rate system thus seems only really workable for given studio fans, but not overall LP shoppers buying scenes from different studios in the past.
minus - flat rate system also stops impulse shopping. Because I may like Mina Luxa a lot, but facing to pay all flat rate just for that 1 scene that evening, ie. 29,99$, is just too expensive lest you are really a very ardent fan with a well filled bank account.
minus - flat rate turns joyful impulse shoppers into calculators eventually. Impulse shopper threshold can be reached still - like me buy-in that flat rate 2 days later because I felt I need Polly Paltovas DAPbreakin' shot in Sao Paulo by Luis instantly - but threshold is much higher. Also its probably not reached at just 1 scene, but after a bunch of scenes user fancies to buy.
minus - flat rate turns well informed and caring fans of a girl into a mass of irresponsible consumers just getting their quick fixes for 29,99$. From that point its a small step to pirate stream sites. Because if you dont care for content and the girls allowing it to be shot anymore, you fall off loyalty to her and the studio(s) she works for. In the short perspective it actually still may give gonzo/LP more money each month, because 29,99 £ is much more than 6,45 $ just for this one Lina Luxa sz2127 DAP scene, but on the long run it may turn the tide.

This is just for you, xxx.
Despite you're shooting back at me really fast!