PornBox.com

This is another thing i hate about these videos.... make them more natural mate!

I do like that re-releaseing call!
Directors have to realize that fans dont want an estetic perfect product but 'realistic' porn sex acts including position changes and anal insertions - even if some girls may be in troubles performing those acts. Its about credibility and truth.

This editing nonsense must be ordered from LP headquarters and must be stopped.
Tt has appeared in more studios (Gonzo, GG, IV). Make a good compromise. But during some certain positions, I'd like to see the changes as well.

Also cutting the shot after or even during gape showing or another interesting feature is a crime!

In SZ1772 there are too many cuts even between position changes.
This Emily Thorne scene indeed looks like cutting was outsourced to people not at all linked to the director of that film, people with now clue of porn at all.

dap-addict wrote:In SZ1772 there are too many cuts even between position changes.
This Emily Thorne scene indeed looks like cutting was outsourced to people not at all linked to the director of that film, people with now clue of porn at all.

Like fucking slide show .

kidloco2 wrote:This editing nonsense must be ordered from LP headquarters and must be stopped.
Tt has appeared in more studios (Gonzo, GG, IV). Make a good compromise. But during some certain positions, I'd like to see the changes as well.

Also cutting the shot after or even during gape showing or another interesting feature is a crime!

July Sun no holes barred fuck session with DP, DAP, TP, TAP & cum swallow in the end SZ1706

What the hell happened here?

I would probably buy more Gonzo.com scenes if the cuts were removed. A lot of times the cuts make the scenes less natural looking -- and are often distracting.

dap-addict wrote:

kidloco2 wrote:This editing nonsense must be ordered from LP headquarters and must be stopped.
Tt has appeared in more studios (Gonzo, GG, IV). Make a good compromise. But during some certain positions, I'd like to see the changes as well.

Also cutting the shot after or even during gape showing or another interesting feature is a crime!

July Sun no holes barred fuck session with DP, DAP, TP, TAP & cum swallow in the end SZ1706

What the hell happened here?

Shit happens...

We are being ignored in this regard, same goes to other content related polls like not a request to stop covering tits, shoot more gapes, etc.

Funny GG wrote he's not doing cuts, but his BTS live stream just proved it wrong, since he shoots the way that the material simply HAS TO be
cut, because he pauses recording a lot during one take / position and talks to the actors like every 5 seconds .

SZ1981, SZ1964 ...

The problem came back

Waka waka scene with kristy black is a bad cut. You dont see her swallow

SZ1858 same thing, it is actually a very good one scene, but without cuts would be the best

This is a pet hate for me too.
I want to see the girl slip off one cock and willingly get into position for the next pounding (ideally crawling there).
Its sexy as fuck, leave it in!

Linda Sweet rough fuck session with fisting, DP & pissing SZ1967

I don't think I've ever seen a scene so butchered by edits

It came back with full strength again after a while of quite peaful edits . Too bad ever cameramen or directors don't see the final cut before releasing! That's hilarious.

A scene with "no cuts" is an illusion, won't happen and can't happen with high performance and high endurance scenes like the ones we want to see. You can have it on some niche sites, maybe, but then the action will be very much downpaced.
The problem isn't a cut, the problem is how visible and obvious and sometimes even inadept it is.
Otoh, it is quite obvious that cuts make it possible to save a scene because you could not publish it uncut on a "normal" website where people will get pushed away by substances coming out of performers they are not used to see coming out of performers.
At the same time there are mayn threads screaming for those many unreleased scenes - why do you think there are so many? Not only to have a nice long reserve pool but they would have to be heavily edited in order to clear the final "taste inspection".
Sure there are many who would love to see that stuff but there are more who don't. Just think of all the "pee"-warnings and the habit of even making to versions of one scene.
But we are getting there slowly, Just think about how "clean" and tidy the early scenes mostly were compared to some of the newer ones.