DPraved wrote:grey00owl wrote:DPraved wrote:Horrible styling and then with an awful boob-job just adds insult to injury. Comparing the girl Luis shot with the girl above is simply worlds apart. She went from spectacular to trash, in my eyes.
I wouldn't be so severe and drastic, but I also prefer her natural look displayed in the pictures above, with natural breasts and natural hair colour. Nonetheless I have to admit that the new trashy look suits her somehow and I still find her very attractive. Disagree about the styling: I love models dressed like schoolgirls.
By the way, can someone merge the both threads related to Paola Hard?
Get off your high horse Caveman39. You have made it perfectly clear what kind of content you get off to, and that is by far more abusive to women than anything I have ever written:
Caveman39 wrote:Mark Zeri trademarks:
VERY HARD MANHANDLING & more so, HIGHLY PERVERSE (the combination which is very rare in itself). It included dirty anal, (mild) scat, (mild) blood due to menstruation or hard anal sports, (mild) vomit, piss, fisting, all kinds of inflatable buttplugs and balloons, such as vibrator balloon getting inserted in butthole and vagina, toys, syringes filed with girls own yellow nectar or with piss of the guys, drinking/snorting cum/piss with and from straws/tubes/hoses/syrunges from for instance their own filled up asshole, using all kinds of medical appliances like gynecologist speculum, candle wax play, milk, whipped cream, pussy hair shaving, chains around the neck with a leash, leather masks and gag balls, high heels and nice lingerie, usage of a dildo hammer drill etc., and all scenes ended with a total wrecked worn out anus of the model(s) and/or with the guys pissing in an anus opened by a speculum......
I still stand by my earlier assertion, however harsh it may seem. In my understanding of the English language, a grown woman in heavy makeup, with poorly done fake boobs and dressed up in a cheap looking school girl outfit, is the very definition of trashy. Mind you, I have nothing against school girl fantasies, so long as they involve teens. When grown women get dressed up to look like teens, it always fails and just looks sad in my eyes. It also highlights the inconsistent nature of so many porn productions where actual teen girls get dressed up like old prostitutes, while women who do look like prostitutes are dressed to look like teens. It just doesn't make sense!
The fact that a perfect beauty such as Paola felt she had to resort to plastic surgery in order to shoot hard porn, just goes to show what a sad state the industry is in. She wasn't even the first example in the last month to do so! Just a couple of weeks ago in the Mia Trejsi thread we got this picture:
BlueShadow wrote:mmh...new lips...
[img]picture[/img]
This has been the case for so many beautiful girls over the years and it's always such a damn shame! The idea that girls need to look like "porn stars" in order to shoot hard porn needs to change! The only way that I can see to do this is through positive reinforcement: Let the girls know that they are the most beautiful in their natural bodies and make sure to book them before they get the urge to perform destructive surgery. You never know; when the girl next door sees others like her become successful on LP, she might realize that she too has what it takes to give it a shot.
Rant over.
That's a lot of text to deflect from what
you said.
You actually spend valuable (weekend) time to go through my old posts to find something you could use for your argumentation?
Well, you failed. Why?
Because my preferences in porn
(Perverx; I still have never seen anything like that before and after their heydey in Brazil and I wish LP would employ good ol' Mark Zeri; thanks for the free bump, here's the original thread: viewtopic.php?f=96&t=26424) has nothing to do with
you calling a new LP model
TRASH. Do you realize what you even said? You didn't say she looked like trash, you compared her to her old photos and then said she's trash.
Even if women (consent) to doing the most dirty perverse porn like on that Perverx site, I wouldn't stoop to call them TRASH (or "nobodies" like certain individuals on these forums like to call certain models).
Why is that necessary to use such harsh words for a girl who give a lot of guys pleasure and whom you will most likely only get to know through your lefty or righty?
Like I said, models may (most likely) have a glance at their topics to read the feedback and seeing that Paola is a LP model now, a little bit of decency towards her would go a long way.
There are stories enough of girls killing themselves or cutting themselves for being bullied online. This girl is
proud to be a porn star,
proud to be a new LP ambassador/model, and
proud with her newly puchased funbags. So, no reason to take away her shine, if you have a preference for "unspoiled beauties".
kaboom1983 wrote:
you don't like fake tits, fine. but don't insult the girls that get them and don't insult the rest of us that like them. if anyone is on their high horse it is you.[/quote]
kaboom1983 wrote:your arrogance about what is an unspoiled beauty is impressive.
+1
Thank you for being civil. 
