PornBox.com

I'm sure I'm not the only one that's noticed that in the last few months Giorgio has slowly been adding some DVP to his scenes, seemingly in response to the popularity it has had with NRX/AGO? As this may prove a controversial decision to some of the hardcore DAP fans here as GG is obviously the king of DAP scenes I ask; How would you ideally like to see GG implement more DVP in his work, if at all - and without disrupting the loyal DAP fanbase?

Personally I love Giorgio's direction and aesthetic and I'm a big fan of DVP scenes too but I don't think he should disrupt the current formula by adding DVP to it. Doing this you become like Gonzo where they add 1-3 minutes of DVP total just so you can put it in the title/tags for sales but the actual quality is boring and an afterthought. If GG is going to start shooting double vaginal seriously it needs to be the primary focus of the video in a series or studio, or at the very least have equal runtime as the DAP like what Angelo does.

What do you think? (Vote is multiple choice)

The claim that DVP is popular is very far fetched. Yes NRX are doing good sales but im sure that has more to do with the fact that they have some of the best models right now. No other studio is even close.

The other two top dog studios, GG and Natacha Teen, both have a clear anal focus in most scenes. It surely would be a big mistake for them to change their successful formula just because of the clueless Angelo Godshak and his loud fanboys in the forum.

I used only 1 of my votes.
All I hope is that Giorgio Grandi's DVP ventures sell as bad as they did so far. I'm generally surprised he started to imitate AGO with a NHB line and recently also bodystockings. Its recycling ideas based on wrongly projected premises while AGO intensity could be easily transferred into anal porn at least with more seasoned actresses.

with all due respect to your opinion,There is no such alternative, but I would vote for this one:

5 It makes no difference to me. I can skip this part of the scene in the player bar.

I see a lot of people complaining about very specific things shot within minutes of the scene. Like piss, dvp, licking, etc. Instead of creating two separate scenes, it would be enough to have a filter for the player to automatically skip these moments of the scenes, being able to have a screen to register "unpleasant" content.


On competing sites there are tags for every minute of the video, so the user can go to the part that interests him. In this my suggestion would serve both to go to the desired tag, and to automatically ignore moments with specific tags. It would also make it easier to post the producers (creating only 1 video), just put the tags at the correct times.

More vaginal sex always gets my vote. Women have more than one hole to be fucked - so use them all.

Diretor wrote:with all due respect to your opinion,There is no such alternative, but I would vote for this one:

5 It makes no difference to me. I can skip this part of the scene in the player bar.

I see a lot of people complaining about very specific things shot within minutes of the scene. Like piss, dvp, licking, etc. Instead of creating two separate scenes, it would be enough to have a filter for the player to automatically skip these moments of the scenes, being able to have a screen to register "unpleasant" content.


On competing sites there are tags for every minute of the video, so the user can go to the part that interests him. In this my suggestion would serve both to go to the desired tag, and to automatically ignore moments with specific tags. It would also make it easier to post the producers (creating only 1 video), just put the tags at the correct times.

I for one like to watch a scene as a whole and as much as possible convince myself it is one real-time event that the participants are enjoying (much as rationally I know this won't normally be the case). Skipping any element of a scene detracts from the experience for me, and for what it's worth I also only watch scenes downloaded and then played back on my TV so any streaming-only filtering option would be a useless feature to me anyway. Many may absolutely and reasonably feel just as you do but I'm just making the point that there are reasons to care about this sort of thing.