PornBox.com

We discussed theis last time 2 years ago and it looked like the problem is mainly solved.
But now it comes back again, I am afraid:
Its GIO editors cutting DAP transfers from one positions to the next one, editing DAP insertions out, so that from lets say cgDAP we get in an eye-blink a zoomed king-of-clubs DAP. WTF!

Happens in 2 out of 3 DAP positions of Ellen Million (gio927).
Also DAP insertions are cut in Sara Bells recent 3on1 BBC (gio921)

Giorgio, can you instruct your cutter to leave all DAP insertion whenever they can only be shown!
Its clear the girl my fight, its clear that extra-mile performing DAP might not look ideal, but thats gonzo porn. Its no glamour show I want.
And support for this position was tremendous in 2016/7!

The fewer edits the better across all scenes and all content as far as I'm concerned.

dap-addict wrote:But now it comes back again, I am afraid:
Its GIO editors cutting DAP transfers from one positions to the next one, editing DAP insertions out, so that from lets say cgDAP we get in an eye-blink a zoomed king-of-clubs DAP. WTF!

This kind of editing - nit to call it censorship:

gio922 - Cassie de Isla 2nd DAP:
First position is cgDAP.
Quite rare choice for GIO as its often doggy > rcdap > cgdap > pile DAP > Kok DAP etc.
But anyway, this one is really a bad example showing at least exactly what I mean and protest against here:






Really can't imagine what was so bad it needed to be censured? Sure Cassie had some troubles getting into that cgDAP, a lot of girls have.
Its a difficult DAP position as studs dap deeper usually. And so what?!
Really wanna watch the way Cassie goes that extra-mile for me!

Don't cut those DAP insertions, Giorgio!!!

+1

Looks a bit like that cut/edit problem started after gio910.
Maybe there is a new editor in studio?
Maybe he has a glamour make-it-look-all-only nice censor built in?


gio880-910 ist much of a problem, below 10% probably.

As far as possible any anal/DAP insertions shouldn't be skipped. +100

dap-addict wrote:gio880-910 ist much of a problem, below 10% probably.

Its more there, too.
20-30%
WTF!

+1 don't edit DAP insertions

+1 Totally agree
Much hotter to see difficult insertions, getting better at DAP from tight insertion to balls deep pounding.
Especially for all the "First" newbie scenes, I think it would be pretty hot to let us enjoy the insertion attempt footage. It would add an amateur gonzo vibe, that would make any subsequent hardcore classic LP gangbang action even hotter.
Watching a girl's full journey from anal virgins to DAP queens would be even better if we could see the details of the attempts along the way.

Lately that pest hit again in a few GIO DAPbreakin' scenes.
Examples will fellow...
But please Giorgio, more quality control!

Yeah I hate it when they cut it out. DAP insertions are dope as shit

Don't edit ANY insertions, it should be simple as that.

drevokocur66 wrote:Don't edit ANY insertions, it should be simple as that.

^This.

Ultra-Gape wrote:

drevokocur66 wrote:Don't edit ANY insertions, it should be simple as that.

^This.

Exactly, would be amazing if any anal/DAP insertion is not skipped/edited, i find essential the fact of appreciate the insertions during the scene to feel the scene more fluid and less sensation of edition and, of course, appreciate the cocks penetrating the ass is magnific and shouldnt be edit