PornBox.com

Again and again and again:
Pussy insertions instead of anal, DP instead of DAP - even in no pussy/100% anal scenes.
Latest example is the super anal sex MILF Lyna Cypher.

I dont even know what to say anymore. I know users dont want editing, I am against over-editing myself, cuts have become a pest on LP recently again, butchered scenes are not what we want. I can edit it out myself of course, but than I dont understand why there is anything to edit out at all still. Also I'd like to collect Giorgio Grandis original work! And third, of course I realize that "wrong hole" insertions just happen, wherever work is done something gets wrong, its natural, but still... common, Angelo, was it really that difficult to find the right orifice with Lyna?! Ok, anchor position is difficult. Bit than in all those other scenes mentioned again and again is it really that difficult for GIO upper fuckers?!

Maybe some more directors guidance?
Maybe GIO studs got too much into autopilot mode on sets?
Maybe some more concentration again?


Anyway, pussy only sex fans please rejoice with these screen caps here:

maybe they are doing it to piss you off dap-addict

You dont know it DAP-Addict but i have a confirmation from GIO that some of his studs are robots and programming code sometimes fails . I can confirm you this "autopilot" thing you said maybe GIO sets it on when hes busy with other things

0% pussy fetish is ruined and ass to pussy can also be unhealthy for the model

0% pussy is something I don't care about at all, unless there's a good amount of anal or DAP in the scene.
But yeah, cutting the pussy parts during video edition would cost nothing and make a few of you happy...

i understand there needs to be scenes for everyone but we definitely need some anal only scenes here on lp. if it was up to me all scenes could be anal only. the pussy can get penetrated on other websites. but that's just my opinion

Does a short wrong hole insertion really destroy the whole scene for you? Why bother when a scene is 99,99% anal and 0,01% pussy? What happened, that you are such a strict pussy opponent? Only out of curiosity...

For me this is not a real problem, but if I were DAP-addict I would then suggest that the model is instructed to always, ALWAYS, grab the cocks and do the anal insertion herself, on every position change and when the guys switch.

I think it would also be hot. Just saying.

Wotan29 wrote:Does a short wrong hole insertion really destroy the whole scene for you? Why bother when a scene is 99,99% anal and 0,01% pussy?

I'm with Wotan29 on that one.

Dude, you know I appreciate most of your posts, but this crusade is kind of ridiculous. Let's say a typcial GIO Scene is 45 minutes long. That's 2700 sceonds. And we're talking about like 10 seconds of wrong hole insertions, touching, whatever. That's 0,0037% of the whole scene. Can't you just let it go?

You know I got a similar fetish about heels. Normally, if they are removed during the scene, I don't buy it. But if they are put back on (happened one or two times lately), I just skip that part and that's about it.

Thats why I called my call desperate in the subject line.
I think there I said it all, and yes Wotan, even 0,001% spoil it, its not about length of pussy only fucking, but being there at all. Either you feel the same or you dont. I can't change it.
And as I wrote somewhere else 2014/15/16 or so I was still into airtight dp but than it changed. Can't help it!

And btw, there was a time a half naked seemed stocking beauty penthouse style was fine for me - just solo.
Than came Private, than JYL/Assman, than nr2ta and than LP. And only the latter two gave me passion.
Maybe this is an answer...

Okay, then there´s only one solution:
If it happens, Giorgio has to classify the scene different.
Instead of 0% PUSSY for example 0,0002584% PUSSY.
Then you know on first sight, you don´t need to buy the scene.

I can understand your fetish DAP addict. But I think you're asking for perfection in a business that is by definition messy and imperfect. Only you (maybe a couple of others at most) give a shit about this tiny "error".
I think that means its up to you to fix and edit it out yourself instead if nagging GIO to do it for you.

'Desperate' is a bit over the top, don't you think?

Jesus Christ you have some serious issues man!! You should take a break from porn, while I appreciate some of your input, your posts are getting more and more ridiculous!

I am about to ruin this whole site for you - every single 0% pussy scene there is an accidental slip into the pussy, whether shown or not every girl got her pussy touched in every 0% pussy scene!

Well, shark, of course they do! But it doesnt make it to the final release usually. So, when cutting out sth than why not cutting it out all?
All I want is to sharpen those directors and post production editors eyes!
You could apply that also for other footage, dirty anal for instance.
Its happening a lot more than shown of course.
Just saying....

I wouldn't complain at all, only that way I can see her used fucked up stretched gaping asshole without a dick inside and I enjoy this view. 10-15 secs for pussy every few minutes is ok for me.

Just wondering whether Sasha Sparrow couldn't take Dylans anal assaults any longer here or it was a simple pussy only fuck wish of Dylan?

https://www.legalporno.com/watch/34982/rough_balls_deep_with_sasha_sparrow_balls_deep_anal_deepthroat_2_cumshot_with_swallow_gio878

Let it go dude, you are making an ass of yourself.

Don't know where to post this, thus for the moment I do it here:
GIO700 Lauren Philips DAPbreakin, min. 13.00ff Tom fucks her pussy instead of DAP-ing Lauren in rc.
She protests loud and clearly!

edit: Or does she finally get off during that 1-2secs of DP?

stevemcgee3 wrote:Let it go dude, you are making an ass of yourself.

+1

dap-addict wrote:Don't know where to post this, thus for the moment I do it here:
GIO700 Lauren Philips DAPbreakin, min. 13.00ff Tom fucks her pussy instead of DAP-ing Lauren in rc.
She protests loud and clearly!

Same once more in pile DAP 39.00ff
1-2 DP instead of DAP.
Lauren again protests, but joyfully and nicely this time.
Tom again!


Btw, SiStu a.o. this is currently an inconsistency warning thread for anal only scenes. If it doesnt touch your interest, just best stay away.
And besides for simple practical reasons I have long resigned from calling for re-editing etc. Its too fussy. And wrong hole insertions just happen in the heat of the action. There is nothing to be made about - except warning the 0% pussy purists.

dap-addict wrote:

dap-addict wrote:Don't know where to post this, thus for the moment I do it here:
GIO700 Lauren Philips DAPbreakin, min. 13.00ff Tom fucks her pussy instead of DAP-ing Lauren in rc.
She protests loud and clearly!

Same once more in pile DAP 39.00ff
1-2 DP instead of DAP.
Lauren again protests, but joyfully and nicely this time.
Tom again!

I think she loves it when the cock goes in her pussy.

In the post scene interview she states that she loves DP. When talking about trying triple penetration she says that 2 cocks in her ass and one in her pussy sounds like more fun.

Can’t blame her for enjoying some wrong hole pussy action.

Long battle actually, but in recent months GIO is much more consistant!
Thanks for listening and instructing your raw footage editor(s), Giorgio!



Disclaimer: This is not against NHB (no holes barred), but only pro scene consistency!

This 5s footage shows me how far GIO went towards 0% pussy scene perfection in the last 2 years.
Thank you, GIO team!

Here is this scene we have an editors fault, clearly:
(GIO1879, 1st failed doggy DAP insertion for May Thai > cut break > 2nd take)

I link the scene for those who exactly search for such editing mistakes : https://pornbox.com/application/watch-page/217324)