Moderator: admin
Skyscraper67 wrote:Giogio grand used to warn the boys about the hands and arms touching the girl in serious positions during the scenes because it often hindered showing parts of the girls during the scenes, but now it has become a mess the arms and hands always appearing and hindering almost every time!
buzzybuzz wrote:Skyscraper67 wrote:Giogio grand used to warn the boys about the hands and arms touching the girl in serious positions during the scenes because it often hindered showing parts of the girls during the scenes, but now it has become a mess the arms and hands always appearing and hindering almost every time!
You really got some serious problems...
Skyscraper67 wrote:buzzybuzz wrote:Skyscraper67 wrote:Giogio grand used to warn the boys about the hands and arms touching the girl in serious positions during the scenes because it often hindered showing parts of the girls during the scenes, but now it has become a mess the arms and hands always appearing and hindering almost every time!
You really got some serious problems...
f you like to see the arms and hands of the boys during the scenes, you better look for another quote of the genre because you are in the wrong place
TheVulture wrote:I totally agree. There was a similar post in a different forum (maybe from the same user?) where myself and others contributed and generally there was agreement that this can be a problem. For sure the male actors are human but there's no need for them to drape their arms around the girls or put their arms and hands in places that obviously obstruct a clear view of the action (a guy in doggy crossing his hands over holding the girls hips is a major bug bear of mine). These things didn't used to happen in porn (either on LP or elsewhere) so there is no need for them to happen now. Often I think it's the guys being on a bit of a "Look at me!" kind of ego trip, often perhaps just a bit careless. But of course a good director would prevent it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests