Moderator: admin
avanfurwet wrote:I guess sometimes it's dubbed over the director's voice or other extraneous sounds.
I'd prefer scenes undubbed if the sounds aren't carefully synced.
Seems a waste of time/money for whoever edits the scenes to introduce dubbed sound that customers dislike.
If it's too much hassle to introduce a boom mic, I'd prefer to put up with the the sound being quieter in longshots, but natural and in sync.
avanfurwet wrote:I guess sometimes it's dubbed over the director's voice or other extraneous sounds.
Giorgio Grandi wrote:I use to direct really a lot, and in post production, specially on the transitions between positions, we remplace the audio.
This problem is connected to the fact that the more I stop for give suggestions/explanations and the more the action is penalized.
Previously I used to cut out from the edited video all the transitions at all, but I was required to keep these parts in the edited video.
Not sure what to say more, maybe is better to cut out the transition at all, the issue is concentrated there imho
avanfurwet wrote:Giorgio Grandi wrote:I use to direct really a lot, and in post production, specially on the transitions between positions, we remplace the audio.
This problem is connected to the fact that the more I stop for give suggestions/explanations and the more the action is penalized.
Previously I used to cut out from the edited video all the transitions at all, but I was required to keep these parts in the edited video.
Not sure what to say more, maybe is better to cut out the transition at all, the issue is concentrated there imho
Thanks Giorgio.
FWIW I would rather keep the transition to keep the flow of the scene.
If the price we pay is to hear the director's voice, I would prefer to hear that instead of dubbed sound.
Just my opinion.
avanfurwet wrote:Giorgio Grandi wrote:I use to direct really a lot, and in post production, specially on the transitions between positions, we remplace the audio.
This problem is connected to the fact that the more I stop for give suggestions/explanations and the more the action is penalized.
Previously I used to cut out from the edited video all the transitions at all, but I was required to keep these parts in the edited video.
Not sure what to say more, maybe is better to cut out the transition at all, the issue is concentrated there imho
Thanks Giorgio.
FWIW I would rather keep the transition to keep the flow of the scene.
If the price we pay is to hear the director's voice, I would prefer to hear that instead of dubbed sound.
Just my opinion.
kidloco2 wrote:Having direct cuts from A to B is horrbile, for example we see a guy fucking her RAC, then he shows a gape
for the first time once for like 1 second and then you have immediatelly cut and we see a guy already fucking in doggy. This is unaccepltable.
avanfurwet wrote:Of course, maybe now we will hear the director's voice, moaning.
ab98985 wrote:this issue is so annoying. And it's disappointing to see that people have been complaining about it for over a year and it still hasn't been fixed. It's at the point where I won't download scenes from this studio anymore because of it.
kidloco2 wrote:Sound is generally more important then picture.
dap-addict wrote:Yep, but its always a question how much of such instructions be it by the girl of the director you want left in the final cut.
If she's asked them to fuck her harder and deeper, there would be no question.
But do we really wanna hear her complain?
And than technically its already end of the fucking basically, she may be tired a bit already and its her good right, but users want her to last for hours and still enjoy it all.
Thats the point when producing porn you may be tempted to just dub a sentence like that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests